Lawrence O’Donnell: Get rid of the Bible on Inauguration Day

[Avatar4321]

Jesus was a Liberal

Jesus was a Jew. Jews in his day were extremely conservative.

This is a stupid argument...

Just STFU RW.

How true....and how did the conservative Jews of his day respond to the liberal Jesus?


Jesus Is A Liberal - Home Page

Webster's dictionary defines a Liberal as one who is open
minded, not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional
or established forms or ways. Jesus was a pluralist Liberal
who taught that one need not conform to strict and orthodox
views of God, religion, and life. He rejected greed, violence,
the glorification of power, the amassing of wealth without
social balance, and the personal judging of others, their
lifestyles and beliefs.

However, you're trying to conflate the actual defition of liberal with the idealogy that is currently labeled liberalism. Which is just a rename progressive movement, which is merely a movement that believes in communism/socialism through evolution instead of revolution.

BTW He rejected personal judging? You familiar with the Bible? Christ is the judge. He commanded us to judge. He called people hypocrites when it was meritted. In fact, the only reason we think a hypocrite is such a bad thing to be is because Christ denounced hypocrisy.

But that wasn't His mission

 

[mudwhistle]

Why swear on the Bible?

Why not have them swear an oath on the Constitution?

Because they don't believe in it.

That's the purpose of an oath Dumbass.

So you're saying they should swear the oath on the communist manifesto?

I think the Bible has alittle stronger support and more authority.

I think swearing an oath on a stack of Bibles is useless if you don't consider them to be worth the paper they're printed on.

It's clear Obama doesn't carry out his oath of office ether because he's a liar and a false Christian.

He should swear on whatever document he considers sacred. Maybe a copy of "Dreams of My Father". I heard he likes Harry Potter. Perhaps a copy of "The Deathly Hallows" would suffice.

 

[Avatar4321]

If you want to define Jesus as a 'liberal', then what does that make you? Cause you ain't no liberal.

And that's why I don't use the term 'liberal' any longer, it's been highjacked, leftist or progressive is much more accurate.

That's the point. Change the definition or obscure it in an effort to decieve people

 

[mjollnir]

Jesus was a Jew. Jews in his day were extremely conservative.

This is a stupid argument...

Just STFU RW.

How true....and how did the conservative Jews of his day respond to the liberal Jesus?


Jesus Is A Liberal - Home Page

Webster's dictionary defines a Liberal as one who is open
minded, not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional
or established forms or ways. Jesus was a pluralist Liberal
who taught that one need not conform to strict and orthodox
views of God, religion, and life. He rejected greed, violence,
the glorification of power, the amassing of wealth without
social balance, and the personal judging of others, their
lifestyles and beliefs.

However, you're trying to conflate the actual defition of liberal with the idealogy that is currently labeled liberalism. Which is just a rename progressive movement, which is merely a movement that believes in communism/socialism through evolution instead of revolution.

BTW He rejected personal judging? You familiar with the Bible? Christ is the judge. He commanded us to judge. He called people hypocrites when it was meritted. In fact, the only reason we think a hypocrite is such a bad thing to be is because Christ denounced hypocrisy.

But that wasn't His mission

 

[Avatar4321]

i guess john quincy adams was a progressive/socialist/marxist

who knew?

lawrence o'donnell is an asshat

on his good days

He has good days?

 

[Avatar4321]

How true....and how did the conservative Jews of his day respond to the liberal Jesus?


Jesus Is A Liberal - Home Page

Webster's dictionary defines a Liberal as one who is open
minded, not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional
or established forms or ways. Jesus was a pluralist Liberal
who taught that one need not conform to strict and orthodox
views of God, religion, and life. He rejected greed, violence,
the glorification of power, the amassing of wealth without
social balance, and the personal judging of others, their
lifestyles and beliefs.

If you want to define Jesus as a 'liberal', then what does that make you? Cause you ain't no liberal.

And that's why I don't use the term 'liberal' any longer, it's been highjacked, leftist or progressive is much more accurate.

Liberalism is a progressive philosophy. That's what you and your ilk fail to understand.

That's probably because you are a conservative. Which is a lockstep, unchanging (or very slow to change) one.

Many liberals in 1776 believed that black people were inferior.

Liberalism progressed from that point.

You guys didn't.

Pure nonsense. It's been the so called Liberals who have held back minority rights. Conservatives don't view people in terms of race. We view people according to their character and actions. I don't know why that's so difficult to comprehend. It's been the left advocating for abortion to eliminate minority populations. It's the left that pushed segregation. Progressive Presidents like Wilson, Roosevelt, and Johnson are some of the most racist Presidents in our nations history.

So no. You haven't progressed past that point. Youre still obsesed with race and dividing people among them. You're still telling blacks they can't succeed without your help. You're still trying to divide people among racial lines.

 

[Avatar4321]

Liberalism is a progressive philosophy. That's what you and your ilk fail to understand.

That's probably because you are a conservative. Which is a lockstep, unchanging (or very slow to change) one.

Many liberals in 1776 believed that black people were inferior.

Liberalism progressed from that point.

You guys didn't.

Progressives aren't for progress.

Progressive is a misnomer much like Democrat is. If they were they wouldn't believe in using Executive Orders over the Democratic process in elections.

so reagan was a democrat? both bushes? nixon? eisenhower?

Executive Orders Disposition Tables Index

i realize you're limited intellectually, but please try to be less obvious about it, okay, asshat?

Pointless argument to have in a Republic.

 

[Avatar4321]

Liberalism is no longer the ideology of teh American Democrat Party of the Left. Those are LOLberals.

Liberalism is found in libertarians, who are considered neoliberals after classical liberalism went belly up and replaced by speciial interest group "liberalism". Which is what the struggle of todays left/right is all about. It's about securing power and favor for the special interests of either side. It's not about equality and liberty for all. Those days are over.

yeah, whatever

Out of idle curiosity, what specifically did he say that you disagree with?

 

[Avatar4321]

]

I think swearing an oath on a stack of Bibles is useless if you don't consider them to be worth the paper they're printed on.

It's clear Obama doesn't carry out his oath of office ether because he's a liar and a false Christian.

He should swear on whatever document he considers sacred. Maybe a copy of "Dreams of My Father". I heard he likes Harry Potter. Perhaps a copy of "The Deathly Hallows" would suffice.

Considering he isn't going to actually uphold the oath, does it matter?

 

[Avatar4321]

How true....and how did the conservative Jews of his day respond to the liberal Jesus?


Jesus Is A Liberal - Home Page

Webster's dictionary defines a Liberal as one who is open
minded, not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional
or established forms or ways. Jesus was a pluralist Liberal
who taught that one need not conform to strict and orthodox
views of God, religion, and life. He rejected greed, violence,
the glorification of power, the amassing of wealth without
social balance, and the personal judging of others, their
lifestyles and beliefs.

However, you're trying to conflate the actual defition of liberal with the idealogy that is currently labeled liberalism. Which is just a rename progressive movement, which is merely a movement that believes in communism/socialism through evolution instead of revolution.

BTW He rejected personal judging? You familiar with the Bible? Christ is the judge. He commanded us to judge. He called people hypocrites when it was meritted. In fact, the only reason we think a hypocrite is such a bad thing to be is because Christ denounced hypocrisy.

But that wasn't His mission

Still refusing to add anything constructive to the conversation.

 

[mjollnir]

However, you're trying to conflate the actual defition of liberal with the idealogy that is currently labeled liberalism. Which is just a rename progressive movement, which is merely a movement that believes in communism/socialism through evolution instead of revolution.

BTW He rejected personal judging? You familiar with the Bible? Christ is the judge. He commanded us to judge. He called people hypocrites when it was meritted. In fact, the only reason we think a hypocrite is such a bad thing to be is because Christ denounced hypocrisy.

But that wasn't His mission

Still refusing to add anything constructive to the conversation.

Sorry, I simply don't consider you either rational or biblically literate, I find you utterly hypocritical and, frankly, about as intellectually dishonest as I've seen at this site.

But I also consider you an Adventure Mormon, hence the pic.

Enjoy!

 

[Newby]

If you want to define Jesus as a 'liberal', then what does that make you? Cause you ain't no liberal.

And that's why I don't use the term 'liberal' any longer, it's been highjacked, leftist or progressive is much more accurate.

Liberalism is a progressive philosophy. That's what you and your ilk fail to understand.

That's probably because you are a conservative. Which is a lockstep, unchanging (or very slow to change) one.

Many liberals in 1776 believed that black people were inferior.

Liberalism progressed from that point.

You guys didn't.

Pure nonsense. It's been the so called Liberals who have held back minority rights. Conservatives don't view people in terms of race. We view people according to their character and actions. I don't know why that's so difficult to comprehend. It's been the left advocating for abortion to eliminate minority populations. It's the left that pushed segregation. Progressive Presidents like Wilson, Roosevelt, and Johnson are some of the most racist Presidents in our nations history.

So no. You haven't progressed past that point. Youre still obsesed with race and dividing people among them. You're still telling blacks they can't succeed without your help. You're still trying to divide people among racial lines.

 

[Newby]

Still refusing to add anything constructive to the conversation.

Sorry, I simply don't consider you either rational or biblically literate, I find you utterly hypocritical and, frankly, about as intellectually dishonest as I've seen at this site.
But I also consider you an Adventure Mormon, hence the pic.

Enjoy!

Why do asswipes like you always describe yourselves in your little tirades about others? Couldn't have said it better myself, when applied to you.

 

[mjollnir]

Still refusing to add anything constructive to the conversation.

Sorry, I simply don't consider you either rational or biblically literate, I find you utterly hypocritical and, frankly, about as intellectually dishonest as I've seen at this site.
But I also consider you an Adventure Mormon, hence the pic.

Enjoy!

Why do asswipes like you always describe yourselves in your little tirades about others? Couldn't have said it better myself, when applied to you.

Why do panting children like you lack even the most cosmetic ability to comprehend when someone or something is irrational and intellectually dishonest?

Is it fear or stupidity in your case, tardlette?

 

[Newby]

Sorry, I simply don't consider you either rational or biblically literate, I find you utterly hypocritical and, frankly, about as intellectually dishonest as I've seen at this site.
But I also consider you an Adventure Mormon, hence the pic.

Enjoy!

Why do asswipes like you always describe yourselves in your little tirades about others? Couldn't have said it better myself, when applied to you.

Why do panting children like you lack even the most cosmetic ability to comprehend when someone or something is irrational and intellectually dishonest?

Is it fear or stupidity in your case, tardlette?

Do you have anything.... ANYTHING... to add to the discussion besides childish 2 year old rants and insults? I suppose that would be expecting too much from someone like you. Nevermind, waste of time to even respond to trolls like you.

 

[mjollnir]

Why do asswipes like you always describe yourselves in your little tirades about others? Couldn't have said it better myself, when applied to you.

Why do panting children like you lack even the most cosmetic ability to comprehend when someone or something is irrational and intellectually dishonest?

Is it fear or stupidity in your case, tardlette?

Do you have anything.... ANYTHING... to add to the discussion besides childish 2 year old rants and insults? I suppose that would be expecting too much from someone like you. Nevermind, waste of time to even respond to trolls like you.

The poster I was replying to, little Tardette, was spewing irrational and transparently dishonest bullshit. He does so all the time. Hence the nature of my reply.

That this makes you shit your pants in fits of impotent rage on such a regular basis isn't my problem, nor is your own pathological stupidity.

Deal with it.

 

[Newby]

Why do panting children like you lack even the most cosmetic ability to comprehend when someone or something is irrational and intellectually dishonest?

Is it fear or stupidity in your case, tardlette?

Do you have anything.... ANYTHING... to add to the discussion besides childish 2 year old rants and insults? I suppose that would be expecting too much from someone like you. Nevermind, waste of time to even respond to trolls like you.

The poster I was replying to, little Tardette, was spewing irrational and transparently dishonest bullshit. He does so all the time. Hence the nature of my reply.

That this makes you shit your pants in fits of impotent rage on such a regular basis isn't my problem, nor is your own pathological stupidity.

Deal with it.

Troll. When you can offer a logical and mature rebuttal to any of his posts, then maybe you can be taken seriously, until then you're just a waste of O2.

 

[Politico]

Lawrence O’Donnell is great, he wants to be the interim Senator for Mass this time.

Yeah right. He couldn't get elected to any office. That's why he is on tv.

 

[NLT]

Why swear on the Bible?

Why not have them swear an oath on the Constitution?

Because he doesnt believe in that either.

 

[mjollnir]

Do you have anything.... ANYTHING... to add to the discussion besides childish 2 year old rants and insults? I suppose that would be expecting too much from someone like you. Nevermind, waste of time to even respond to trolls like you.

The poster I was replying to, little Tardette, was spewing irrational and transparently dishonest bullshit. He does so all the time. Hence the nature of my reply.

That this makes you shit your pants in fits of impotent rage on such a regular basis isn't my problem, nor is your own pathological stupidity.

Deal with it.

Troll. When you can offer a logical and mature rebuttal to any of his posts, then maybe you can be taken seriously, until then you're just a waste of O2.

Logic and you remain tragically and utterly unacquainted, Tardette, and I can see how this frustrates you.

When all I have to respond to is absurdities, ridiculous stereotypes and historical inaccuracies and misrepresentations, no 'rebuttal' is really necessary.

You're clearly too stupid to see that, and you have my pity.