FA_Q2
Gold Member
Utter bullshit. What you are comparing is the individual LE determining whether or not to charge a specific individual during a specific encounter with the ENTIRE government removing law without going through the process that is required.Well sure. Your op is fucking stupid.
law officers of all agencies pick and choose what laws to follow. Not my fault you are fucking stupid and have to make a point of it.
Also, please give us all an example of law officers choosing not to follow laws? Give us all an example of a previous presidential administration decreeing that they will be directing their agencies to flaunt federal law--choosing not to enforce it.
This should be interesting. You are purposely misrepresenting the facts, or, more likely, willfully ignorant.
Look up any blue law. Or when you are going 40 in a 35 and pass a cop. When you are drinking and the cop just tells you to drive safe home.
Too easy...
Let me give you a clue, no law, ever, is 100 percent applicable to 100 percent of the possible iterations might actually occur in life. There are instances where LE must make judgment calls as to whether or not to apply a law to a particular situation. That does not mean that LE are simply allowed to ignore a law because they don't like it. Perhaps you would be fine if a county in AZ simply ignored murder laws whenever a white person killed a black person. They can, after all, ignore law just like Obama has instructed his agencies to do....
No, of course that is asinine. Obama does not have the right to simply ignore existing law that has been created in congress, signed by the current president at the time and put into place without actually repealing the damn law.