Kuwait Goes Nuclear

Discussion in 'Energy' started by KissMy, Sep 12, 2010.

  1. KissMy
    Offline

    KissMy Free Breast Exam

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    12,064
    Thanks Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +2,923
    Kuwait Goes Nuclear

     
  2. asterism
    Offline

    asterism Congress != Progress

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    8,592
    Thanks Received:
    906
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Ratings:
    +1,073
    Good for them.
     
  3. boedicca
    Offline

    boedicca Uppity Water Nymph Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2007
    Messages:
    41,818
    Thanks Received:
    12,780
    Trophy Points:
    2,250
    Location:
    The Land of Funk
    Ratings:
    +22,825
    We should follow their example and switch to nuclear energy as much as possible as well.
     
  4. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    Yep, Responsible Nuclear energy could virtually solve our Energy Crisis. Spent fuel rods can be reprocessed. 0 emissions and cheap power. What's not to like.
     
  5. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,299
    Thanks Received:
    5,693
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,759
    :clap2:
     
  6. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,474
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,318
    Cost.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,474
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,318
    Comparative electrical generation costs - SourceWatch

    Comparative costs data: California regulatory agencies (May 2008)
    On May 13, 2008, the California Energy Commission and the California Public Utilities Commission released a comparison of the costs of of new generating capacity from various sources. The analysis for the comparison was prepared by Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc., a consulting firm that prepares studies for utilities, governmental regulators, law firms, and non-profit agencies.[1] These estimates include firming resource costs.

    Busbar cost in cents per kilowatt-hour in 2008 dollars:

    Coal:

    Coal Supercritical: 10.554
    Coal Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC): 11.481
    Coal IGCC with Carbon Capture & Storage (IGCC with CCS): 17.317
    Alternatives:

    Biogas: 8.552
    Wind: 8.910
    Gas Combined Cycle: 9.382 (assumes $5.50 to $6.50/MMBtu for gas)
    Geothermal: 10.182
    Hydroelectric: 10.527
    Concentrating solar thermal (CSP): 12.653
    Nuclear: 15.316
    Biomass: 16.485
    Busbar means the price of the power leaving the plant. All capital, fuel, and operating costs are taken into account in busbar costs.

    The spreadsheet containing these costs can be found at CPUC GHG Modeling.
     
  8. KissMy
    Offline

    KissMy Free Breast Exam

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2009
    Messages:
    12,064
    Thanks Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    In your head
    Ratings:
    +2,923
    Nuclear is best for base-load power. Wind & Solar are spontaneous & need Hydro for storage. Natural Gas & Coal coal balance load & peak power.
     
  9. Charles_Main
    Offline

    Charles_Main AR15 Owner

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    16,692
    Thanks Received:
    2,238
    Trophy Points:
    88
    Location:
    Michigan, USA
    Ratings:
    +2,251
    Exactly how are those costs calculated is what I want to know. A nuclear plant requires a very large initial investment. So the longer it operates The better cost to gain ratio you will have. So when they figured those costs did they figure that in at all?
     
  10. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    46,474
    Thanks Received:
    5,416
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +10,318
    Another point here, when a nuke reachs the end of its lifespan, ussually about 20 years, it is a very expensive process to remove the core, and ship it to a safe storage facility. When a wind turbine reachs it expected life span, also about twenty years, they simply use a crane to remove the old turbine, and install a new one on the tower. Then the old one goes in for a rebuild.
     

Share This Page