karl marx grave needs to be removed.

[whitehall]

"The guts to tear down" a freaking grave? Listen to yourself, you are starting to sound like Marx.

 

[Tehon]

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Actually you are quite wrong on every count.

Communism is not a state of being it is not the perfect stateless classless society. It is in fact the ideology and process of getting there and it is abominably evil evil by design.

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Society has no needs people do which is there is no such contradiction which is a fact and yet more proof of the absolute stupidity of marx and his followers.

Socialsm is not coming we have seen it fail too many times and is a worthless world view and ideology,

Trump won the White House because the evil capitalists decided they could produce commodities for greater profit in foreign lands. Americans lost jobs and they voted for the person who promised to bring them back. That is a social contradiction caused by capitalism. It will get worse. You will be clamoring for Marxist philosophy before all is said and done. Be patient.

Marxist philosophy is evil at the core and by design. It is no coincidence that every nation which has tried it has ended up with genocide, starvation, tyranny, poverty and destitution.

Capitalists can be evil but no one is evil because they are a capitalist and your analysis is massively stupid. Promising jobs was only one small part of why he was elected. Marx you have tunnel vision and ignore all the other factors and motives which led to his election. Jobs was not even the biggest one although he has delivered on it.

There is no social contradiction caused by capitalism.

Explain why anyone would want a philosophy which demands dictatorship?

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

You live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, you're just not bright enough to pick up on it. I can't help you.

 

[Rustic]

Why would anyone wish to " normalize " an I ideology which consistently results in massive increases in poverty, destitution and starvation ?

Because an economic system that concentrates wealth in fewer and fewer hands with each passing generation will continue to inflict poverty, war, and starvation on millions of innocent human beings in order for a small percentage to the world's population to live the "American Dream."

Monthly Review | Why Socialism?

"Private capital tends to become concentrated in few hands, partly because of competition among the capitalists, and partly because technological development and the increasing division of labor encourage the formation of larger units of production at the expense of smaller ones.

"The result of these developments is an oligarchy of private capital the enormous power of which cannot be effectively checked even by a democratically organized political society.

"This is true since the members of legislative bodies are selected by political parties, largely financed or otherwise influenced by private capitalists who, for all practical purposes, separate the electorate from the legislature.

"The consequence is that the representatives of the people do not in fact sufficiently protect the interests of the underprivileged sections of the population.

"Moreover, under existing conditions, private capitalists inevitably control, directly or indirectly, the main sources of information (press, radio, education).

"It is thus extremely difficult, and indeed in most cases quite impossible, for the individual citizen to come to objective conclusions and to make intelligent use of his political rights."

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Marx was a retard

 

[Soupnazi630]

All false.

Wealth is created for all and even though the wealthy get more of it a rising tide lifts ALL ships.

Capitalism has decreased poverty and benefited man more than any other system

Communism has not. Communism has consistently made things worse.

So once again even assuming your claims of wealth are true ( they are not ) why would you instead advocate an idea which is proven to be a failure and evil?

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Actually you are quite wrong on every count.

Communism is not a state of being it is not the perfect stateless classless society. It is in fact the ideology and process of getting there and it is abominably evil evil by design.

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Society has no needs people do which is there is no such contradiction which is a fact and yet more proof of the absolute stupidity of marx and his followers.

Socialsm is not coming we have seen it fail too many times and is a worthless world view and ideology,

Trump won the White House because the evil capitalists decided they could produce commodities for greater profit in foreign lands. Americans lost jobs and they voted for the person who promised to bring them back. That is a social contradiction caused by capitalism. It will get worse. You will be clamoring for Marxist philosophy before all is said and done. Be patient.

Marxist philosophy is evil at the core and by design. It is no coincidence that every nation which has tried it has ended up with genocide, starvation, tyranny, poverty and destitution.

Capitalists can be evil but no one is evil because they are a capitalist and your analysis is massively stupid. Promising jobs was only one small part of why he was elected. Marx you have tunnel vision and ignore all the other factors and motives which led to his election. Jobs was not even the biggest one although he has delivered on it.

There is no social contradiction caused by capitalism.

Explain why anyone would want a philosophy which demands dictatorship?

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

You live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, you're just not bright enough to pick up on it. I can't help you.

No I do not and neither do you.

It is not a matter of being bright it is a matter of having faith in something which cannot be seen or demonstrated or proven or observed.

You are simply as gullible sap who believes in such tripe from marx. You or marx saying it exists does not make it so. You are not bright or enlightened or better informed.

Now answer the question and tell me why a dictatorship is preferable?

Stop being a moral coward and explain

 

[Tehon]

Communism has yet to exist.

Marx was well aware of the benefits to our social evolution provided by the capitalist means of production. He was also well aware of how it would develop and how its full development would come to contradict societies needs.

We are witnessing that play out. Trump's election is a manifestation of that contradiction.

Socialism only develops out of fully developed capitalism. Be patient, it's coming.

Actually you are quite wrong on every count.

Communism is not a state of being it is not the perfect stateless classless society. It is in fact the ideology and process of getting there and it is abominably evil evil by design.

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Society has no needs people do which is there is no such contradiction which is a fact and yet more proof of the absolute stupidity of marx and his followers.

Socialsm is not coming we have seen it fail too many times and is a worthless world view and ideology,

Trump won the White House because the evil capitalists decided they could produce commodities for greater profit in foreign lands. Americans lost jobs and they voted for the person who promised to bring them back. That is a social contradiction caused by capitalism. It will get worse. You will be clamoring for Marxist philosophy before all is said and done. Be patient.

Marxist philosophy is evil at the core and by design. It is no coincidence that every nation which has tried it has ended up with genocide, starvation, tyranny, poverty and destitution.

Capitalists can be evil but no one is evil because they are a capitalist and your analysis is massively stupid. Promising jobs was only one small part of why he was elected. Marx you have tunnel vision and ignore all the other factors and motives which led to his election. Jobs was not even the biggest one although he has delivered on it.

There is no social contradiction caused by capitalism.

Explain why anyone would want a philosophy which demands dictatorship?

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

You live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, you're just not bright enough to pick up on it. I can't help you.

No I do not and neither do you.

It is not a matter of being bright it is a matter of having faith in something which cannot be seen or demonstrated or proven or observed.

You are simply as gullible sap who believes in such tripe from marx. You or marx saying it exists does not make it so. You are not bright or enlightened or better informed.

Now answer the question and tell me why a dictatorship is preferable?

Stop being a moral coward and explain

You government is captured by an elite class.
Your media is captured by an elite class.
Your social institutions are captured by an elite class.

You are gullible.

Why do you prefer to live under the dictatorship of an elite class?

 

[georgephillip]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

 

[Tehon]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Actually you are quite wrong on every count.

Communism is not a state of being it is not the perfect stateless classless society. It is in fact the ideology and process of getting there and it is abominably evil evil by design.

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Society has no needs people do which is there is no such contradiction which is a fact and yet more proof of the absolute stupidity of marx and his followers.

Socialsm is not coming we have seen it fail too many times and is a worthless world view and ideology,

Trump won the White House because the evil capitalists decided they could produce commodities for greater profit in foreign lands. Americans lost jobs and they voted for the person who promised to bring them back. That is a social contradiction caused by capitalism. It will get worse. You will be clamoring for Marxist philosophy before all is said and done. Be patient.

Marxist philosophy is evil at the core and by design. It is no coincidence that every nation which has tried it has ended up with genocide, starvation, tyranny, poverty and destitution.

Capitalists can be evil but no one is evil because they are a capitalist and your analysis is massively stupid. Promising jobs was only one small part of why he was elected. Marx you have tunnel vision and ignore all the other factors and motives which led to his election. Jobs was not even the biggest one although he has delivered on it.

There is no social contradiction caused by capitalism.

Explain why anyone would want a philosophy which demands dictatorship?

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

You live in a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie, you're just not bright enough to pick up on it. I can't help you.

No I do not and neither do you.

It is not a matter of being bright it is a matter of having faith in something which cannot be seen or demonstrated or proven or observed.

You are simply as gullible sap who believes in such tripe from marx. You or marx saying it exists does not make it so. You are not bright or enlightened or better informed.

Now answer the question and tell me why a dictatorship is preferable?

Stop being a moral coward and explain

You government is captured by an elite class.
Your media is captured by an elite class.
Your social institutions are captured by an elite class.

You are gullible.

Why do you prefer to live under the dictatorship of an elite class?

Once again YOU saying so does not make it true.

You cannot provide a shred of evidence or support for any of your claims because they are nothing more than FICTION

]Now answer the question and stop running like a cowardly fuck

 

[Soupnazi630]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

 

[Tehon]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

Everyone knows it. That is why they voted for the outsider in the last presidential election.

 

[Soupnazi630]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

We live under no dictatorship and according to Marx dictatorship of the proletariat meant DESPOTISM and DICTATORSHIP.

He was not speaking in euphemisms or code or metaphor he meant DICTATORSHIP and TYRANNY with all of the attendant violence and oppression.

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

 

[Soupnazi630]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

Everyone knows it. That is why they voted for the outsider in the last presidential election.

No they do not know it what they know is that communism is evil by design and consistently results in evil

Bow answer the question why would i want a dictatorship when we DO NOT have one NOW?

 

[Tehon]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

Everyone knows it. That is why they voted for the outsider in the last presidential election.

No they do not know it what they know is that communism is evil by design and consistently results in evil

Bow answer the question why would i want a dictatorship when we DO NOT have one NOW?

The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production, so that thereby, generally speaking, the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production are subject to it. The ruling ideas are nothing more than the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships, the dominant material relationships grasped as ideas.

Marx, German Ideology (1845)

 

[Tehon]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

Everyone knows it. That is why they voted for the outsider in the last presidential election.

No they do not know it what they know is that communism is evil by design and consistently results in evil

Bow answer the question why would i want a dictatorship when we DO NOT have one NOW?

Everyone knows it. That is why they like Trump to attack the media. They are in control the means of mental production. Everyone knows it.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

Everyone knows it. That is why they voted for the outsider in the last presidential election.

No they do not know it what they know is that communism is evil by design and consistently results in evil

Bow answer the question why would i want a dictatorship when we DO NOT have one NOW?

The ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas, i.e. the class which is the ruling material force of society, is at the same time its ruling intellectual force. The class which has the means of material production at its disposal, has control at the same time over the means of mental production, so that thereby, generally speaking, the ideas of those who lack the means of mental production are subject to it. The ruling ideas are nothing more than the ideal expression of the dominant material relationships, the dominant material relationships grasped as ideas.

Marx, German Ideology (1845)

All of which proves what a fool marx was as no one is ruling here and we have no dictatorship now stop trying to run and evade like a coward and explain why we would want one.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

Everyone knows it. That is why they voted for the outsider in the last presidential election.

No they do not know it what they know is that communism is evil by design and consistently results in evil

Bow answer the question why would i want a dictatorship when we DO NOT have one NOW?

Everyone knows it. That is why they like Trump to attack the media. They are in control the means of mental production. Everyone knows it.

No they do not fool.

You have no idea what people believe and know and neither do I

I do however know that all intelligent people reject Marx

Now stop running away like a bitch and answer the question

 

[georgephillip]

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Name one.

 

[LittleNipper]

I believe Marx and Darwin should be buried together. They were birds of a feather...

 

[Tehon]

Soupnazi knows full well what is being said. He has no choice but to feign ignorance.

You are a liar and coward.

I know nothing of the sort I do in fact know you are truly a fool

Everyone knows it. That is why they voted for the outsider in the last presidential election.

No they do not know it what they know is that communism is evil by design and consistently results in evil

Bow answer the question why would i want a dictatorship when we DO NOT have one NOW?

Everyone knows it. That is why they like Trump to attack the media. They are in control the means of mental production. Everyone knows it.

No they do not fool.

You have no idea what people believe and know and neither do I

I do however know that all intelligent people reject Marx

Now stop running away like a bitch and answer the question

 

[Soupnazi630]

Marx had no clue how capitalism or capitalist means of production would develop. He predicted many things about this development and EVERY thing HE EVER predicted has been absolutely proven wrong.

Name one.

He specifically predicted that the proletariat class would shrink.

It grew and continues to grow. Not only does it grow it splits and as opposed to his idiotic world view we have multiple classes with a great deal of upward and downward mobility


he predicted that as capitalism grew the proletariat class would be treated worse and worse and live in greater poverty. Exactly the opposite happened as capitalism has enriched and improved the lives of countless and continues to do so.

Is it any wonder why the biggest opponents to marxism are working class people who KNOW better?

No it is not a coincidence. They are all smarter than the fucking fool marx