karl marx grave needs to be removed.

[georgephillip]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

We live under no dictatorship and according to Marx dictatorship of the proletariat meant DESPOTISM and DICTATORSHIP.

He was not speaking in euphemisms or code or metaphor he meant DICTATORSHIP and TYRANNY with all of the attendant violence and oppression.

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

Marx would recognize a dictatorship of capital like this one:

Why don't you?

 

[Tehon]

He wrote that the workers would SPONTANEOUSLY rise up and sieze the means of production because this is the inevitable result of the dialectic view of history

Where did he write that the workers would SPONTANEOUSLY rise up and seize the means of production? In the Communist Manifesto he describes a long struggle.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He specifically predicted that the proletariat class would shrink.

It grew and continues to grow. Not only does it grow it splits and as opposed to his idiotic world view we have multiple classes with a great deal of upward and downward mobility

Marx specifically predicted the proletariat class would shrink as technology fundamentally changes the relationship between work and subsistence. As machines replace human labor, humans will find it difficult (at best) to generate economic value from their work, and this is exactly what is happening today as millions of living wage US jobs leave the country for China and Mexico.

China is Responsible for US Manufacturing Job Loss | AutoInformed

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

 

[Soupnazi630]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

We live under no dictatorship and according to Marx dictatorship of the proletariat meant DESPOTISM and DICTATORSHIP.

He was not speaking in euphemisms or code or metaphor he meant DICTATORSHIP and TYRANNY with all of the attendant violence and oppression.

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

Marx would recognize a dictatorship of capital like this one:

Why don't you?

It is not a dictator ship

He would not recognize it he would whine about it being something it is not as you are doing.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He wrote that the workers would SPONTANEOUSLY rise up and sieze the means of production because this is the inevitable result of the dialectic view of history

Where did he write that the workers would SPONTANEOUSLY rise up and seize the means of production? In the Communist Manifesto he describes a long struggle.

Answer the question coward.

 

[georgephillip]

He specifically predicted that the proletariat class would shrink.

It grew and continues to grow. Not only does it grow it splits and as opposed to his idiotic world view we have multiple classes with a great deal of upward and downward mobility

Marx specifically predicted the proletariat class would shrink as technology fundamentally changes the relationship between work and subsistence. As machines replace human labor, humans will find it difficult (at best) to generate economic value from their work, and this is exactly what is happening today as millions of living wage US jobs leave the country for China and Mexico.

China is Responsible for US Manufacturing Job Loss | AutoInformed

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

"It"?
Do you mean "proletariat"?
If so, national or international proletariat?

Manufacturing Job Loss: Trade, Not Productivity, Is the Culprit

"The United States lost 5 million manufacturing jobs between January 2000 and December 2014.

"There is a widespread misperception that rapid productivity growth is the primary cause of continuing manufacturing job losses over the past 15 years.

"Instead, as this report shows, job losses can be traced to growing trade deficits in manufacturing products prior to the Great Recession and then the massive output collapse during the Great Recession."

Are you in denial about how much automation will continue to affect human employment opportunities?

 

[georgephillip]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

We live under no dictatorship and according to Marx dictatorship of the proletariat meant DESPOTISM and DICTATORSHIP.

He was not speaking in euphemisms or code or metaphor he meant DICTATORSHIP and TYRANNY with all of the attendant violence and oppression.

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

Marx would recognize a dictatorship of capital like this one:

Why don't you?

It is not a dictator ship

He would not recognize it he would whine about it being something it is not as you are doing.

It is not a dictator ship

He would not recognize it he would whine about it being something it is not as you are doing.

When your only viable "choice" for POTUS is between a billionaire crony-capitalist and his multi-millionaire political puppets, you are living in a Dictatorship of Capital.

 

[Soupnazi630]

He specifically predicted that the proletariat class would shrink.

It grew and continues to grow. Not only does it grow it splits and as opposed to his idiotic world view we have multiple classes with a great deal of upward and downward mobility

Marx specifically predicted the proletariat class would shrink as technology fundamentally changes the relationship between work and subsistence. As machines replace human labor, humans will find it difficult (at best) to generate economic value from their work, and this is exactly what is happening today as millions of living wage US jobs leave the country for China and Mexico.

China is Responsible for US Manufacturing Job Loss | AutoInformed

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

"It"?
Do you mean "proletariat"?
If so, national or international proletariat?

Manufacturing Job Loss: Trade, Not Productivity, Is the Culprit

"The United States lost 5 million manufacturing jobs between January 2000 and December 2014.

"There is a widespread misperception that rapid productivity growth is the primary cause of continuing manufacturing job losses over the past 15 years.

"Instead, as this report shows, job losses can be traced to growing trade deficits in manufacturing products prior to the Great Recession and then the massive output collapse during the Great Recession."

Are you in denial about how much automation will continue to affect human employment opportunities?

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

Thanks to capitalism

 

[Soupnazi630]

DO not dodge as you have in the past. Marx preached dictatorship of the proletariat by which he MEANT DICTATORSHIP and despotism and tyranny.

We do not have one now so why would I want one?

Dictatorship of the Proletariat means direct democratic control of government by a majority of citizens, as opposed to our current dictatorship of capital:

Some Thoughts on the Dictatorship of the Proletariat – INIP

"Many workers today are confused about a key concept of historical materialism, the idea of the 'dictatorship of the proletariat.'

"It is a very literal English translation, it means exactly how it reads: the idea that workers should have political power, instead of the bosses, corporations and landlords—essentially the exact opposite of what we have today.

"We live under the 'dictatorship of Capital,' where everything is reduced to exchange values and commodification, even people."

Why do you think Marx began his examination of capitalism with the "commodity"?

We live under no dictatorship and according to Marx dictatorship of the proletariat meant DESPOTISM and DICTATORSHIP.

He was not speaking in euphemisms or code or metaphor he meant DICTATORSHIP and TYRANNY with all of the attendant violence and oppression.

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

He meant that a panel or committee or group would dictate to the world every aspect of every persons life.

Now explain why a dictatorship is a good idea

Marx would recognize a dictatorship of capital like this one:

Why don't you?

It is not a dictator ship

He would not recognize it he would whine about it being something it is not as you are doing.

It is not a dictator ship

He would not recognize it he would whine about it being something it is not as you are doing.

When your only viable "choice" for POTUS is between a billionaire crony-capitalist and his multi-millionaire political puppets, you are living in a Dictatorship of Capital.

No you are not

By definition regardless of how limited the choice we still have no dictatorship

The word has a meaning which you are mis using in order to defend the absolute worst ideology in human history

No matter how many stupid and uneducated asseetions you make Marx has been PROVEN wrong and an evil bastard

 

[JimBowie1958]

And you sheep ...

Do some homework kid.

Um, the only Amerindians forced to move were tribes that were threatening war or had prominent members who were.

That is why so many Amerindians still live in Eastern states on reservations.

There was no genocide of Amerindians and the Amerindians that died on the Trail of Tears were mostly killed by weather, disease and other Amerindian tribes men fighting each other.

 

[georgephillip]

He specifically predicted that the proletariat class would shrink.

It grew and continues to grow. Not only does it grow it splits and as opposed to his idiotic world view we have multiple classes with a great deal of upward and downward mobility

Marx specifically predicted the proletariat class would shrink as technology fundamentally changes the relationship between work and subsistence. As machines replace human labor, humans will find it difficult (at best) to generate economic value from their work, and this is exactly what is happening today as millions of living wage US jobs leave the country for China and Mexico.

China is Responsible for US Manufacturing Job Loss | AutoInformed

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

"It"?
Do you mean "proletariat"?
If so, national or international proletariat?

Manufacturing Job Loss: Trade, Not Productivity, Is the Culprit

"The United States lost 5 million manufacturing jobs between January 2000 and December 2014.

"There is a widespread misperception that rapid productivity growth is the primary cause of continuing manufacturing job losses over the past 15 years.

"Instead, as this report shows, job losses can be traced to growing trade deficits in manufacturing products prior to the Great Recession and then the massive output collapse during the Great Recession."

Are you in denial about how much automation will continue to affect human employment opportunities?

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

Thanks to capitalism

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

"Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

"By Associated Press
Published: Jan 24, 2019 11:25 a.m. ET..."

"Robots aren’t replacing everyone, but a quarter of U.S. jobs will be severely disrupted as artificial intelligence accelerates the automation of existing work, according to a new Brookings Institution report.

"The report, published Thursday, says roughly 36 million Americans hold jobs with 'high exposure' to automation — meaning at least 70 percent of their tasks could soon be performed by machines using current technology.

"Among those most likely to be affected are cooks, waiters and others in food services; short-haul truck drivers; and clerical office workers."

One of the Industrial Revolution's prime talking points was that machines would one day free humanity from the need to work.

For millions of Americans, that day has come and gone with capitalists hoarding all the spoils.

Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

 

[Soupnazi630]

He specifically predicted that the proletariat class would shrink.

It grew and continues to grow. Not only does it grow it splits and as opposed to his idiotic world view we have multiple classes with a great deal of upward and downward mobility

Marx specifically predicted the proletariat class would shrink as technology fundamentally changes the relationship between work and subsistence. As machines replace human labor, humans will find it difficult (at best) to generate economic value from their work, and this is exactly what is happening today as millions of living wage US jobs leave the country for China and Mexico.

China is Responsible for US Manufacturing Job Loss | AutoInformed

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

"It"?
Do you mean "proletariat"?
If so, national or international proletariat?

Manufacturing Job Loss: Trade, Not Productivity, Is the Culprit

"The United States lost 5 million manufacturing jobs between January 2000 and December 2014.

"There is a widespread misperception that rapid productivity growth is the primary cause of continuing manufacturing job losses over the past 15 years.

"Instead, as this report shows, job losses can be traced to growing trade deficits in manufacturing products prior to the Great Recession and then the massive output collapse during the Great Recession."

Are you in denial about how much automation will continue to affect human employment opportunities?

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

Thanks to capitalism

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

"Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

"By Associated Press
Published: Jan 24, 2019 11:25 a.m. ET..."

"Robots aren’t replacing everyone, but a quarter of U.S. jobs will be severely disrupted as artificial intelligence accelerates the automation of existing work, according to a new Brookings Institution report.

"The report, published Thursday, says roughly 36 million Americans hold jobs with 'high exposure' to automation — meaning at least 70 percent of their tasks could soon be performed by machines using current technology.

"Among those most likely to be affected are cooks, waiters and others in food services; short-haul truck drivers; and clerical office workers."

One of the Industrial Revolution's prime talking points was that machines would one day free humanity from the need to work.

For millions of Americans, that day has come and gone with capitalists hoarding all the spoils.

Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

And then 60 million new jobs will be created

Once again

Automation historically increases the need for employees

No reason to believe this will be different.

 

[georgephillip]

Marx specifically predicted the proletariat class would shrink as technology fundamentally changes the relationship between work and subsistence. As machines replace human labor, humans will find it difficult (at best) to generate economic value from their work, and this is exactly what is happening today as millions of living wage US jobs leave the country for China and Mexico.

China is Responsible for US Manufacturing Job Loss | AutoInformed

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

"It"?
Do you mean "proletariat"?
If so, national or international proletariat?

Manufacturing Job Loss: Trade, Not Productivity, Is the Culprit

"The United States lost 5 million manufacturing jobs between January 2000 and December 2014.

"There is a widespread misperception that rapid productivity growth is the primary cause of continuing manufacturing job losses over the past 15 years.

"Instead, as this report shows, job losses can be traced to growing trade deficits in manufacturing products prior to the Great Recession and then the massive output collapse during the Great Recession."

Are you in denial about how much automation will continue to affect human employment opportunities?

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

Thanks to capitalism

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

"Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

"By Associated Press
Published: Jan 24, 2019 11:25 a.m. ET..."

"Robots aren’t replacing everyone, but a quarter of U.S. jobs will be severely disrupted as artificial intelligence accelerates the automation of existing work, according to a new Brookings Institution report.

"The report, published Thursday, says roughly 36 million Americans hold jobs with 'high exposure' to automation — meaning at least 70 percent of their tasks could soon be performed by machines using current technology.

"Among those most likely to be affected are cooks, waiters and others in food services; short-haul truck drivers; and clerical office workers."

One of the Industrial Revolution's prime talking points was that machines would one day free humanity from the need to work.

For millions of Americans, that day has come and gone with capitalists hoarding all the spoils.

Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

And then 60 million new jobs will be created

Once again

Automation historically increases the need for employees

No reason to believe this will be different.

Automation historically increases the need for employees

No reason to believe this will be different.

Tell me where new jobs will come from in the following scenarios:

Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

"Google this year is piloting the use of its digital voice assistant at hotel lobbies to instantly interpret conversations across a few dozen languages.

"Autonomous vehicles could replace short-haul delivery drivers. WalmartWMT, +0.17% and other retailers are preparing to open cashier-less stores powered by in-store sensors or cameras with facial recognition technology.

"'Restaurants will be able to get along with significantly reduced workforces,' Muro said. 'In the hotel industry, instead of five people manning a desk to greet people, there’s one and people basically serve themselves.'"

 

[Soupnazi630]

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

Except it has not shrunk

It has grown

"It"?
Do you mean "proletariat"?
If so, national or international proletariat?

Manufacturing Job Loss: Trade, Not Productivity, Is the Culprit

"The United States lost 5 million manufacturing jobs between January 2000 and December 2014.

"There is a widespread misperception that rapid productivity growth is the primary cause of continuing manufacturing job losses over the past 15 years.

"Instead, as this report shows, job losses can be traced to growing trade deficits in manufacturing products prior to the Great Recession and then the massive output collapse during the Great Recession."

Are you in denial about how much automation will continue to affect human employment opportunities?

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

Thanks to capitalism

Automation historically increases employment and there is no reason to believe it will do otherwise.

The proletariat class is still growing as are many other classes while even the lowest class do better than ever before.

"Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

"By Associated Press
Published: Jan 24, 2019 11:25 a.m. ET..."

"Robots aren’t replacing everyone, but a quarter of U.S. jobs will be severely disrupted as artificial intelligence accelerates the automation of existing work, according to a new Brookings Institution report.

"The report, published Thursday, says roughly 36 million Americans hold jobs with 'high exposure' to automation — meaning at least 70 percent of their tasks could soon be performed by machines using current technology.

"Among those most likely to be affected are cooks, waiters and others in food services; short-haul truck drivers; and clerical office workers."

One of the Industrial Revolution's prime talking points was that machines would one day free humanity from the need to work.

For millions of Americans, that day has come and gone with capitalists hoarding all the spoils.

Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

And then 60 million new jobs will be created

Once again

Automation historically increases the need for employees

No reason to believe this will be different.

Automation historically increases the need for employees

No reason to believe this will be different.

Tell me where new jobs will come from in the following scenarios:

Over 30 million U.S. workers will lose their jobs because of AI

"Google this year is piloting the use of its digital voice assistant at hotel lobbies to instantly interpret conversations across a few dozen languages.

"Autonomous vehicles could replace short-haul delivery drivers. WalmartWMT, +0.17% and other retailers are preparing to open cashier-less stores powered by in-store sensors or cameras with facial recognition technology.

"'Restaurants will be able to get along with significantly reduced workforces,' Muro said. 'In the hotel industry, instead of five people manning a desk to greet people, there’s one and people basically serve themselves.'"

Yes and no reason to believe expect the economy will not grow as a result requiring more labor.