That's right. It's none of your damn business, so stop pushing your perversion on other people's children.I'm not surprised you would see nothing wrong with indoctrinating children into discussions of oral and anal sex without the consent of their parents.Be careful, you'll hurt your back reaching to defend your liberal sickness.This thread is proof that liberals have a serious morality deficit. They see nothing wrong with teachers showing children porn under the guise of "education". What's next, teachers exposing themselves? They would probably approve of that too.
If you had read the article you would see what caused this bill to be created.
If you think a poster that asks a question and then talks about the subject as part of their abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.
I know all conservatives are the most laziest people in our nation so I'll do your work for you and the rest of the lazy conservatives on this thread.
Kansas could put teachers in prison for assigning books prosecutors don’t like - Salon.com
After introducing the bill earlier this month, Pilcher-Cook told the Topeka Capital-Journal that she did so in response to a poster displayed at a Shawnee Mission middle school in 2013. The poster posed the question, “How do people express their sexual feelings?” and listed such examples as oral sex, kissing, intercourse, and talking. Media outlets pounced on the controversy after some parents complained, and though the poster was part of a broader sex education curriculum that emphasized abstinence, the school suspended use of the material.
If you think a poster as part of abstinence only sex education is pornography then you don't know what pornography is.
You can say I'm defending liberal sickness but that's a very ridiculous thing to say.
I'm defending free speech and thought. You want to ban free speech and thought. If someone was showing a porno movie I would object. If someone was giving kids the web addresses to porno sites I would object. If someone was handing out copies of playboy or other porno magazines I would object.
What I don't object to is a mature discussion in regard to sex education. A poster with words on it as part of an abstinence only course isn't pornography.
I'm not surprised you don't know the difference.
I'm sure the Christian Fascists would find a discussion of oral and anal sex with their children fascinating. I haven't been pre puberty for a very very long time but do clearly recall two neighbor girls, a local farm girl and a fully mature mother of one of my brothers friends propositioning me before I was thirteen. This was way before they even allowed married couples to be seen sleeping in the same bed on the TV.
Why do these so called conservatives need so desperately to be involved in other peoples, teens and younger's sexual development? Why are so many christians perverts? Is that what the elected christians believe? Do they really think they got elected to decide what other people are allowed to read?
Do you want to know what it looks like from a distance? It looks like many christians are way too interested in the sexual ideas that teens have. What is VERY strange is that these so called morality police don't think what they are doing is perverted. It is perverted. Teens are going to think about sex. You asshats can't change that. Not everyone cares to get involved in teenage sexual fantasies like Pat O'Reilly. Most well adjusted adult people find this quest YOU people are on to be disgusting and perverted.
I don't care if little Bobby or little Samatha think about oral or anal sex. It is REALLY none of mine nor YOUR business. When you make it your business you are going WAY over the line.
You people are creepy on a 1-10 scale around a 20.