K Marx about Putin´s empire ( Muscovy ). I must admit both creators or Marxism - Communism Marx and Engels were well educated men. Which makes Marxism

[Litwin]

K Marx about Putin´s empire ( Muscovy ). I must admit both creators or Marxism - Communism Marx and Engels were well educated men. Which makes Marxism - Communism even more dangerous!

 

[rupol2000]

K Marx about Putin´s empire ( Muscovy ). I must admit both creators or Marxism - Communism Marx and Engels were well educated men. Which makes Marxism - Communism even more dangerous!


View attachment 640749

Marx is German. Muscovy is a German country, it was founded by the Prussians, its queens were the Prussians. For example, Catherine 2. Prussians are Litvins. It was the land of Marxist slaves.

Do not involve the Great Horde here, there was no Marxist slavery

 

[Litwin]

it was founded by the Prussians,

wrong, it was founded by the Mongols

RUSSIA Putin, heir to the Mongol Grand Khans - AsiaNews​

https://www.asianews.it › news-en › Putin,-heir-to-the-...





21 Apr 2018 — Putin, heir to the Mongol Grand Khans ... According to scholar Tjundeshev, Batu Khan was the true founder of Russian statehood. China, India and

 

[Pellinore]

Nobody *really* knows where the word Rus comes from. It goes back to Roman times, and nationalists from each ethnicity tend to claim it as theirs. It was first used to refer to the Slavic people north of the Byzantine Empire. In a political sense, it first referred to the Kievan Rus, a collection of tribes (mostly and culturally Slavic) in what is now Belarus, western Russia, most of Ukraine, and eastern Poland, about a thousand years ago. It was named for the city of Kiev, its early capital at the southern part of their area.

The Kievan Rus was founded by Rurik and ruled by his dynasty; he was a Varangian (a group of relocated eastern Vikings) but, like all Varangians, had largely assimilated into Slavic culture. Rurik's great-grandson Vladimir brought Christianity, and the region grew. Vladimir's great-great-grandson Yuri established the city of Moscow in the northeastern part of the territory, which became more and more prominent. The title 'Grand Prince of Kiev' was passed around to various tribes within the Kievan Rus, and the lucky one who had it when the Mongols showed up, kicked everyone's ass, and took over was Yuri's great-grandson Alexander Nevsky.

The Mongols weren't very interested in taking over, so they mostly left the rulers alone as long as they paid their cut. Alexander Nevsky was the Grand Prince of Moscow who played the game long enough to gain power to regain functional independence in about the mid-13th century. Cut to today: Moscow, Russia.

So Marx was wrong (imagine that). Moscow was founded by Slavs from the Kievan Rus. Muscovite Russians are descended from Slavs and a mishmash of lesser tribes. Their leaders were also Slavs, in a house founded by a transplanted Viking, ten generations earlier. They were taken over by Mongol invaders for a while, but they got past that.

The Prussians, by the way, were way too late to the party. Catherine the Great wasn't for another 600 years, and she married into Russian royalty anyway.

 

[rupol2000]

wrong, it was founded by the Mongols

RUSSIA Putin, heir to the Mongol Grand Khans - AsiaNews​

https://www.asianews.it › news-en › Putin,-heir-to-the-...





21 Apr 2018 — Putin, heir to the Mongol Grand Khans ... According to scholar Tjundeshev, Batu Khan was the true founder of Russian statehood. China, India and

Are you talking about Great Horde or Baltic Moscowites like golyad and litvins?

 

[rupol2000]

Nobody *really* knows where the word Rus comes from. It goes back to Roman times, and nationalists from each ethnicity tend to claim it as theirs. It was first used to refer to the Slavic people north of the Byzantine Empire. In a political sense, it first referred to the Kievan Rus, a collection of tribes (mostly and culturally Slavic) in what is now Belarus, western Russia, most of Ukraine, and eastern Poland, about a thousand years ago. It was named for the city of Kiev, its early capital at the southern part of their area.

The Kievan Rus was founded by Rurik and ruled by his dynasty; he was a Varangian (a group of relocated eastern Vikings) but, like all Varangians, had largely assimilated into Slavic culture. Rurik's great-grandson Vladimir brought Christianity, and the region grew. Vladimir's great-great-grandson Yuri established the city of Moscow in the northeastern part of the territory, which became more and more prominent. The title 'Grand Prince of Kiev' was passed around to various tribes within the Kievan Rus, and the lucky one who had it when the Mongols showed up, kicked everyone's ass, and took over was Yuri's great-grandson Alexander Nevsky.

The Mongols weren't very interested in taking over, so they mostly left the rulers alone as long as they paid their cut. Alexander Nevsky was the Grand Prince of Moscow who played the game long enough to gain power to regain functional independence in about the mid-13th century. Cut to today: Moscow, Russia.

So Marx was wrong (imagine that). Moscow was founded by Slavs from the Kievan Rus. Muscovite Russians are descended from Slavs and a mishmash of lesser tribes. Their leaders were also Slavs, in a house founded by a transplanted Viking, ten generations earlier. They were taken over by Mongol invaders for a while, but they got past that.

The Prussians, by the way, were way too late to the party. Catherine the Great wasn't for another 600 years, and she married into Russian royalty anyway.

View attachment 640819

this is a false map, the ancient Russian state never went to the sea. It was only the region of Kyiv. And they did not own Kyiv (Sambat) for long

 

[rupol2000]

Here is more or less real data

Nowhere is there any data on the advance of Russia south of Kyiv

 

[rupol2000]

So Marx was wrong (imagine that). Moscow was founded by Slavs from the Kievan Rus. Muscovite Russians are descended from Slavs and a mishmash of lesser tribes. Their leaders were also Slavs, in a house founded by a transplanted Viking, ten generations earlier. They were taken over by Mongol invaders for a while, but they got past that.

Moscow appeared as a fortification rather late, around the time of Khan Uzbek.

It doesn't matter who founded it, but the bottom line is that the Moscow native Golyad tribes belonged to the Baltic peoples. Slavs are a linguistic community, not an ethnic one. Marx was a jerk, but he is partly right that the original Slavic speakers were steppe horse breeders. in Eastern Europe, the Slavic language appeared in the Danube region, from the Bulgars and Avars, the Baltic regions, including the Old Russian state, were not "Slavs" at that time

 

[Litwin]

Are you talking about Great Horde or Baltic Moscowites like golyad and litvins?

i TALK About this

any comment on this ?

 

[rupol2000]

That is why the Slavic languages retained much more of the Aryan grammar, in the west it died out altogether, although Latin was still Aryan.
In the Ukrainian and Polish languages, even a certain degree of melody and ancient atavisms, such as the vocative case, have been preserved.

 

[rupol2000]

i TALK About this

I didn't understand what you are talking about. Moscow Golyad is a Baltic tribe, similar to the Litvins and Prussians. This is the original Muscovy. There, even the queens were Prussians

I've already explained that to you. Do they even teach you the school curriculum there in Lithuania?

 

[Litwin]

Here is more or less real data

Nowhere is there any data on the advance of Russia south of Kyiv

ivan always drunk, or suck muslisms dicks , education is not you thing ivan slave

 

[rupol2000]

 

[Litwin]

the original Muscovy.

no poor slave , this is original Muscovy:

the fact is that you are just A mongol , dirty , oriental MONGOL with 0 connection to Kyiv Rus´or Prussia .

 

[Litwin]

you Mongol , the world leading expert :

Kyiv Rus has nothing to do with Muscovy, Timothy Snyder​

 

[rupol2000]

ivan always drunk, or suck muslisms dicks , education is not you thing ivan slave

Bast shoes and vodka are just attributes of the Balts. The Balts were the most backward people in Europe, they still had the Neolithic and bone needles in the 6th-7th centuries, they lived in dugouts.

And they had slavery.

I've already explained this to you as a fucking moron.


Even in the 19th century, there was no slavery on the Don and Volga, it never existed there.

And the Poles freed Litvin from slavery for the first time during the Commonwealth. But apparently in vain they were released.

To this day, the Balts and Finns have a national problem with alcoholism, don't you know about it, you moron? This is stated at the level of state policy, which is why you always have expensive alcohol there.

 

[Litwin]

Balts

Love letter, ID card point to "russian" units that terrorised Bucha

“I heard sounds of bones being broken. The sounds of a beating...There was screaming, lots of screaming.” ... “It’s good you are close, close in my heart, but you are far, serving our Motherland, protecting us. I’m proud of you!” Rybakova wrote, kissing the bottom of the letter and leaving an...

www.usmessageboard.com

 

[rupol2000]

no poor slave , this is original Muscovy:

If the Horde for Lithuanian cretins = Moscow, then so be it, lol.

And these are your ancestors like Yatvags or Chukhons

 

[rupol2000]

I have no idea that this degenerate saw "shameful" in a knight dressed in armor.
Apparently something is connected with the national Litvinian drink - vodka

 

[rupol2000]

Indeed, most of the Russian Federation and Ukraine belong to the steppe culture of horse breeders, including the Golden Horde. This does not apply to Muscovy and the Kyiv hetmanate. But about 80% of Ukraine is a steppe region. where 4 meters of black soil. Yes, these were military aristocratic cultures, and they pressed slaveholding Europe.

But I have no idea what to be ashamed of.

America is also cowboys and supermen.


Apparently swamp spirits and alcohol ate this man's remains of his brain