Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So assassination is legal now??
So assassination is legal now??
Those of us that support the Constitution, Law and order categorically state that assassination is not legal and should be prosecuted.
The members of the narcotized populace will say that it wasn't an assassination because it "was a targeted military strike".
.
So assassination is legal now??
Those of us that support the Constitution, Law and order categorically state that assassination is not legal and should be prosecuted.
The members of the narcotized populace will say that it wasn't an assassination because it "was a targeted military strike".
.
Osama Bin Laden declared war on the United States and planned the killing of several thousand Americans.
Those of us that support the Constitution, Law and order categorically state that assassination is not legal and should be prosecuted.
The members of the narcotized populace will say that it wasn't an assassination because it "was a targeted military strike".
.
Osama Bin Laden declared war on the United States and planned the killing of several thousand Americans.
Let me help you out here.
Show EVIDENCE that Osamah declared war on the US of A and had the means to carry his threat to fruition.
If you are going to rely on videos for your argument please show EVIDENCE that those videos were authenticated.
.
.
Osama Bin Laden declared war on the United States and planned the killing of several thousand Americans.
Let me help you out here.
Show EVIDENCE that Osamah declared war on the US of A and had the means to carry his threat to fruition.
If you are going to rely on videos for your argument please show EVIDENCE that those videos were authenticated.
.
.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orawG7vt68o]YouTube - CNN: 1997, Osama Bin Laden declares jihad[/ame]
It's from CNN.
If you don't believe them..then we are done.
Let me help you out here.
Show EVIDENCE that Osamah declared war on the US of A and had the means to carry his threat to fruition.
If you are going to rely on videos for your argument please show EVIDENCE that those videos were authenticated.
.
.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orawG7vt68o]YouTube - CNN: 1997, Osama Bin Laden declares jihad[/ame]
It's from CNN.
If you don't believe them..then we are done.
Yo Vern, did you listen to the video? He gave the same response as the one given to the Pakistani newspaper.
He declared jihad against MILITARY targets in Saudi Arabia. He specifically stated that he would not go after civilian targets.
If you don't believe your own evidence ..then we are done.
.
So assassination is legal now??
YouTube - CNN: 1997, Osama Bin Laden declares jihad
It's from CNN.
If you don't believe them..then we are done.
Yo Vern, did you listen to the video? He gave the same response as the one given to the Pakistani newspaper.
He declared jihad against MILITARY targets in Saudi Arabia. He specifically stated that he would not go after civilian targets.
If you don't believe your own evidence ..then we are done.
.
So you seriously believe that Bin Laden didn't desire to kill every American?
The killing is not prohibited by the longstanding assassination prohibition in Executive Order 12333 because the action was a military action in the ongoing U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and it is not prohibited to kill specific leaders of an opposing force. The assassination prohibition also does not apply to killings in self-defense. The executive branch will also argue that the action was permissible under international law both as a permissible use of force in the U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and as a legitimate action in self-defense, given that bin Laden was clearly planning additional attacks.
Bin Laden Killing: the Legal Basis - Council on Foreign Relations
Unfortunately the article doesnt go into any detail but we may assume the former justice was aware of and referring to the following:
The killing is not prohibited by the longstanding assassination prohibition in Executive Order 12333 because the action was a military action in the ongoing U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and it is not prohibited to kill specific leaders of an opposing force. The assassination prohibition also does not apply to killings in self-defense. The executive branch will also argue that the action was permissible under international law both as a permissible use of force in the U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and as a legitimate action in self-defense, given that bin Laden was clearly planning additional attacks.
Bin Laden Killing: the Legal Basis - Council on Foreign Relations
This would indicate Stevens is not one mans opinion.
Unfortunately the article doesnt go into any detail but we may assume the former justice was aware of and referring to the following:
The killing is not prohibited by the longstanding assassination prohibition in Executive Order 12333 because the action was a military action in the ongoing U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and it is not prohibited to kill specific leaders of an opposing force. The assassination prohibition also does not apply to killings in self-defense. The executive branch will also argue that the action was permissible under international law both as a permissible use of force in the U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and as a legitimate action in self-defense, given that bin Laden was clearly planning additional attacks.
Bin Laden Killing: the Legal Basis - Council on Foreign Relations
This would indicate Stevens is not one mans opinion.
The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal Principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. Justice Robert H. Jackson, West Virginia Board of Education vs. Barnette, 1943
.
Unfortunately the article doesnt go into any detail but we may assume the former justice was aware of and referring to the following:
This would indicate Stevens is not one mans opinion.
The very purpose of a Bill of Rights was to withdraw certain subjects from the vicissitudes of political controversy, to place them beyond the reach of majorities and officials and to establish them as legal Principles to be applied by the courts. One's right to life, liberty, and property, to free speech, a free press, freedom of worship and assembly, and other fundamental rights may not be submitted to vote; they depend on the outcome of no elections. Justice Robert H. Jackson, West Virginia Board of Education vs. Barnette, 1943
.
That is correct, but unfortunately for Bin Laden and others, the COTUS does NOT prohibit us from using our military to kill them. Not in any section.
Unfortunately the article doesnt go into any detail but we may assume the former justice was aware of and referring to the following:
This would indicate Stevens is not one mans opinion.The killing is not prohibited by the longstanding assassination prohibition in Executive Order 12333 because the action was a military action in the ongoing U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and it is not prohibited to kill specific leaders of an opposing force. The assassination prohibition also does not apply to killings in self-defense. The executive branch will also argue that the action was permissible under international law both as a permissible use of force in the U.S. armed conflict with al-Qaeda and as a legitimate action in self-defense, given that bin Laden was clearly planning additional attacks.
Bin Laden Killing: the Legal Basis - Council on Foreign Relations
I assume someone will be posting a link soon from a legal source documenting the killing was illegal.