David Icke's site is NOT 'a legitimate news source' . If you are interested, people will attempt to explain the difference to you.
While the initial article may have indeed appeared in a legitimate news source, the version of it which is posted in between 'analysis' (NOT using professional standards or methods!) by Icke is no longer 'original': it has been reproduced by a person who believes that shape-shifting reptilian aliens are controlling our world.
Now if you feel that is a credible source, that is certainly your right.
And it's Toro's and mine and the greater community's to disagree - and to resist your attempt to redefine the content of 'legitimate news source'.
A word of advice, kiddo: If you can't deal well with rejection, don't set out to 'correct' everyone else's views.
While the initial article may have indeed appeared in a legitimate news source, the version of it which is posted in between 'analysis' (NOT using professional standards or methods!) by Icke is no longer 'original': it has been reproduced by a person who believes that shape-shifting reptilian aliens are controlling our world.
Now if you feel that is a credible source, that is certainly your right.
And it's Toro's and mine and the greater community's to disagree - and to resist your attempt to redefine the content of 'legitimate news source'.
A word of advice, kiddo: If you can't deal well with rejection, don't set out to 'correct' everyone else's views.