Jobs, jobs, jobs!

1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new low paying ) Democrats oppose

2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new low paying jobs) Democrats oppose

3) end business taxation; so that the tax burden falls all on us. ( 5 million new jobs) not true! We see that if you give them money, they don't necessarily use it to hire anyone. Democrats oppose. Your policies already proved not to work. But yet you keep pushing them.

6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose So does GOP. Your party is divided on this. The racists vs the corporations hiring the illegals. Pass a law that gives employers jail time. Illegals will go home if no jobs. We pander to the hispanic vote too but who's hiring them? That's how you fix this problem. The GOP aint doin nothing about it and you know it.

8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new low paying jobs) Democrats oppose of course

10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

You have the balls to keep pushing for deregulations when your deregulations crashed the economy?

12) support unlimited free trade is what sent 7 million jobs overseas ( 2 million new low paying jobs) Clinton repeated this lie. It did not create jobs. Liar.

13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose LIE, NONSENSE AND CRUEL. Your policies caused poverty and now you want to cut the people it hurt off? Nice. Not in America.

The rest of what you say is rediculous bullpuckey. Your Ron Paul Grand experiment will never work and thank God no ones buying into it. But the kock brothers keep on trying.
 
If it is up to the GOP and corporations, they'd send even more jobs overseas.

actually it is 100% liberals who are doing it:

1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

3) end business taxation; especially tax incentives to off-shore jobs ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

4) make inflation illegal ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose


5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

7) Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to Constitution( 3 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

9) Make health insurance competition legal( 6 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

11) restrict Federal spending to 15% of GNP( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

12) support unlimited free trade( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

14) privatize education, social security ( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

15) end payroll taxes ( 1 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

Since Democrats always oppose wisdom and common sense the only serious option is to make them illegal as the Constitution intended.

You wanna produce a source for those numbers or what? :eusa_eh:

Chances are their numbers will be fudged. Or unprovable like the number of jobs Romney created while at Bain Capital.
 
your list of 'fixes' simlpy allow the good ship capitalism off the leash even more

of course America as more unleashed capitalism than any country and the highest standard of living in human history!!

Would the liberal rather leash it up like the USSR or Communist China did or like France does?? See why we are positive a liberal will have no ability to think?? What other conclusion is possible???? PLease tell me?
 
actually it is 100% liberals who are doing it:

1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

3) end business taxation; especially tax incentives to off-shore jobs ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

4) make inflation illegal ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose


5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

7) Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to Constitution( 3 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

9) Make health insurance competition legal( 6 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

11) restrict Federal spending to 15% of GNP( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

12) support unlimited free trade( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

14) privatize education, social security ( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

15) end payroll taxes ( 1 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

Since Democrats always oppose wisdom and common sense the only serious option is to make them illegal as the Constitution intended.

You wanna produce a source for those numbers or what? :eusa_eh:

Chances are their numbers will be fudged. Or unprovable like the number of jobs Romney created while at Bain Capital.


can the liberal pick even one above and offer a reason to explain why it would not create millions of jobs????
 
your list of 'fixes' simlpy allow the good ship capitalism off the leash even more

of course if there was even one that did not create jobs you would not be so afraid to explain it

The cuts in federal spending would lead to job losses. Oh, you are thinking ahead. In other words, if we fire the 1 million postal workers, UPS will hire 2 million people to do what it took 1 million federal workers?

Is that what you are saying? It will also cost a lot more to mail a letter or package.

Yes, lowering wages should lead to more jobs. So instead of a college grad making $50K a year, you think they should only make $30K a year and the company will hire more people? Great! NOT!
 
You wanna produce a source for those numbers or what? :eusa_eh:

Chances are their numbers will be fudged. Or unprovable like the number of jobs Romney created while at Bain Capital.


can the liberal pick even one above and offer a reason to explain why it would not create millions of jobs????

Sure they would. Low paying jobs. So the rich will get even richer and the poor will get even poorer?

Seems someone doesn't understand the problems that come when the gap between the rich and poor is so wide.

If not for Unions you'd be working 80 hour weeks and you would get no vacation or sick days.

Middle class Ron Paul voters think they'll do well under his ideas? HA! Think again.

Or maybe you think you'll be fine and you don't care about the next generation of Americans? That is what the 99%ers are feeling and that is why a revolution is coming in November. 1948 all over again. Romney? Really? Best you got? LOL.

You and Romney are out of touch. You've gone too far with your radical agenda and this aint midterms. People are going to show up in droves.
 
And now back to the issue, Jobs.

It's pretty clear our economy is moving forward and as clear that the House of Representatives has failed if it was their intent to stall the economy until the Republicans capture the White House.

Listening to Romney's stump speech it is also clear he is DeMinted or a liar (and I do know how to spell demented, for those who didn't get the play on the word); I believe he is both.

His record is that of a RINO, or at least in the simple minds of many self defined conservatives, yet he is kissing the collective ass of the far right, and some of them actually believe him. Sad but true. Romney pointing fingers at Obama is fine, but why must he lie sometimes and contradict himself later?

Romney and the others running for the GOP nomination don't care that our economy is in recovery, that the stock market has rebounded or that employment in the private sector is on the upswing. (had cities, counties and states not suffered so badly from the Bush Great Recession, the public sector job losses wouldn't be so great and the figures for unemployment would be lower). Romney continues to try - and continues to fail - to rewrite history and claim Obama has failed in his duties. In some interviews he claims the economy is worse under Obama, and in other interviews he flops and admits the economy is improving.

Since Gingrich, Santorum and Paul are each nuts in their own unique way, it's likely we'll see Romney as the nominee of the GOP. Seriously people, is he the best and the brightest the R's have?



The economy only has to add 53,000 jobs per month before the election for the Big 0 to avoid being the first President since Hoover to have a net loos of jobs during his Presidency.

The Reps don't need a very best and brightest to do better than a complete and utter failure.

The Big 0 is about the best campaigner in the history of the Republic. And the worst President.

We were bleeding those jobs overseas on Bush's watch. Your kind said it was ok and those people in manufacturing who don't have degrees just needed to go get some education. Remember?

And we'd be doing better if the House GOP didn't cut all those government jobs. They made those cuts knowing it would hurt Obama's numbers.

And what jobs did Bush create? Haloburton (at the tax payers expense) and McDonald jobs.

So you didn't realize the importance of good paying manufacturing jobs? Us liberals tried to warn you.

Now you are crying about not enough jobs? Now that Obama's in charge you understand?

If it is up to the GOP and corporations, they'd send even more jobs overseas. Or in order to bring jobs back they'll want two things. No unions, so cheap labor, and tax breaks to the corporations.

That's the goal, or one of them. Corporations pay no taxes. The burdens on us. And lower wages. Good for the corporations, bad for us.



Glad to see you're awake after your coma.

The number of Government jobs is way up under the Big 0.

You're 0 for 1.

The house hasn't cut anything since Harry and the Zombies won't bring anything up for a vote.

You're 0 for 2.

Your guy, who incidentally is a joke, said that he was going to remedy the situation by spending about a trillion dollars on a stimulus. He was wrong in the approach, wrong in the goals and wrong in the execution. He wasted the cash and we still have no jobs and now we also have another 5 Trillion in debt.

He missed it completely.

You're 0 for 3.

Three strikes and you're out, but thanks for playing our game.
 
If it is up to the GOP and corporations, they'd send even more jobs overseas.

actually it is 100% liberals who are doing it:

1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

3) end business taxation; especially tax incentives to off-shore jobs ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

4) make inflation illegal ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose


5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

7) Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to Constitution( 3 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

9) Make health insurance competition legal( 6 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

11) restrict Federal spending to 15% of GNP( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

12) support unlimited free trade( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

14) privatize education, social security ( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

15) end payroll taxes ( 1 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

Since Democrats always oppose wisdom and common sense the only serious option is to make them illegal as the Constitution intended.

You're really funny, both ha ha funny and, well you know, funney.

The first three suggest to me you've never really considered the consequences of what you propose. Number four suggests you have no backgound in economics, history, or reality.

But, thanks for sharing.
 
Imagine where we could be if the republicnas hadnt placed party over country at every turn for Obamas entire term

You are so good at what you do TH, you really are wasting your talents here. Why are you not employed by the Ministry of Propaganda.... I mean the State Department. I mean, shit.... TM, The sheer depth of your Intellect, is .... chilling to normal Mortals. ;)

You mean Republicans supported Obama? Who knew?
 
If it is up to the GOP and corporations, they'd send even more jobs overseas.

actually it is 100% liberals who are doing it:

1) Make unions illegal ( 10 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

2) make minimum wage illegal ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

3) end business taxation; especially tax incentives to off-shore jobs ( 5 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

4) make inflation illegal ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose


5) make Federal debt illegal( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

6) send illegal workers home(8 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

7) Pass Balanced Budget Amendment to Constitution( 3 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

8) cut pay of government workers in half( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

9) Make health insurance competition legal( 6 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

10) end needless business regulations ( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

11) restrict Federal spending to 15% of GNP( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

12) support unlimited free trade( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

13) reduced unemployment compensation, welfare, food stamps, medicaid.( 2 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

14) privatize education, social security ( 4 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

15) end payroll taxes ( 1 million new jobs) Democrats oppose

Since Democrats always oppose wisdom and common sense the only serious option is to make them illegal as the Constitution intended.

You're really funny, both ha ha funny and, well you know, funney.

The first three suggest to me you've never really considered the consequences of what you propose. Number four suggests you have no backgound in economics, history, or reality.

But, thanks for sharing.

I go with "no background in reality". What else could fully explain it?
 
can the liberal pick even one above and offer a reason to explain why it would not create millions of jobs????

Sure they would. Low paying jobs. So the rich will get even richer and the poor will get even poorer?

actually with 50 million new jobs there would be tremendous upward pressure on wages. Does the liberal care to try again???
 
If not for Unions you'd be working 80 hour weeks and you would get no vacation or sick days.

of course thats perfeclty idiotic and liberal. A company must offer the best jobs at the highest pay possible or lose his best workers to those who will pay the most possible. CEO's get 20 million not because of unions but because of competition. Capitalism improves jobs not unions. Unions destry jobs and in fact have off shored about 30 million of them!!

Also, the vast majority are not in unions and never were so how could they possibly be responsible for no 80 hour weeks?? See the way liberals think?
 
Last edited:
You've gone too far with your radical agenda and this aint midterms.

actually freedom from big liberal government is not radical it is the basic philosophy of America. Why would you say radical unless you know nothing about America?
 
Number four suggests you have no backgound in economics, history, or reality.

of course if true the liberal would not be so afraid to explain what he means exactly. What does your fear tell you??

His fear obviously tells him you have no background in economics, history, or reality.

In the long run moderate inflation doesn't affect employment. Classical Dichotomy: reals affect reals, nominals affect nominals.

In the short run inflation increases employment by temporarily lowering the real wage.
 
In the long run moderate inflation doesn't affect employment.

Why change the subject??The subject was whether inflation could be made illegal. You would agree if you had the character to admit it.

Actually, the subject was "Number four suggests you have no background in economics, history or reality". You claimed making inflation illegal would create jobs, which shows no background in economics.

But yes, you can make inflation illegal within reason. Change the Fed's target from 2% inflation to 0% inflation and make it bind over the short run as well as the long run.
 

Forum List

Back
Top