Jimmy Kimmel gets political , uses newborn son's heart condition to attack Trumpcare

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,745
2,040
Jimmy Kimmel told a harrowing story about his newborn son’s open heart surgery. And, because he’s a late-night TV host in 2017, he turned it into a harangue against repealing Obamacare.



Jimmy Kimmel Gets Political, Uses Newborn Son’s Heart Condition To Attack Trumpcare
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comedian pulls on America's heartstrings to push agenda

Just another dumb ass sheeple who doesn't know facts and is assisting the MSM controlled freaks into brainwashing their herd of morons.
 
Jimmy Kimmel told a harrowing story about his newborn son’s open heart surgery. And, because he’s a late-night TV host in 2017, he turned it into a harangue against repealing Obamacare.



Jimmy Kimmel Gets Political, Uses Newborn Son’s Heart Condition To Attack Trumpcare
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comedian pulls on America's heartstrings to push agenda

Just another dumb ass sheeple who doesn't know facts and is assisting the MSM controlled freaks into brainwashing their herd of morons.


yes, how dare he tell the truth.

:cuckoo:

he didn't have to "get" political. it's already political when loons want to take away health coverage from 25 million people.

pathetic loons
 
The main point that he was bringing up was that because his son was born with a heart defect, that is considered a pre existing condition by the insurance companies, meaning that his son wouldn't have survived if he wasn't who he was. He also said that it is wrong to make parents watch their children die because they can't afford health care.

All his points were spot on.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
The main point that he was bringing up was that because his son was born with a heart defect, that is considered a pre existing condition by the insurance companies, meaning that his son wouldn't have survived if he wasn't who he was. He also said that it is wrong to make parents watch their children die because they can't afford health care.

All his points were spot on.

Decode the black and white.
 
Shouldn't we all pay taxes? Cause by the time I pay for Kimmel's son's healthcare and my taxes I cannot afford my own 16 thousand dollar deductibles! Sheesh
 
Jimmy Kimmel told a harrowing story about his newborn son’s open heart surgery. And, because he’s a late-night TV host in 2017, he turned it into a harangue against repealing Obamacare.



Jimmy Kimmel Gets Political, Uses Newborn Son’s Heart Condition To Attack Trumpcare
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comedian pulls on America's heartstrings to push agenda

Just another dumb ass sheeple who doesn't know facts and is assisting the MSM controlled freaks into brainwashing their herd of morons.


yes, how dare he tell the truth.

:cuckoo:

he didn't have to "get" political. it's already political when loons want to take away health coverage from 25 million people.

pathetic loons


Um......these are the same 25 million people who refused to buy it when they were given a free choice in the matter, right?
 
Jimmy Kimmel told a harrowing story about his newborn son’s open heart surgery. And, because he’s a late-night TV host in 2017, he turned it into a harangue against repealing Obamacare.



Jimmy Kimmel Gets Political, Uses Newborn Son’s Heart Condition To Attack Trumpcare
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comedian pulls on America's heartstrings to push agenda

Just another dumb ass sheeple who doesn't know facts and is assisting the MSM controlled freaks into brainwashing their herd of morons.


yes, how dare he tell the truth.

:cuckoo:

he didn't have to "get" political. it's already political when loons want to take away health coverage from 25 million people.

pathetic loons


Um......these are the same 25 million people who refused to buy it when they were given a free choice in the matter, right?

Nope! It's the 25 million who get it for free off the backs of the taxpayers children.
 
Shouldn't we all pay taxes? Cause by the time I pay for Kimmel's son's healthcare and my taxes I cannot afford my own 16 thousand dollar deductibles! Sheesh

I doubt you have a 16000 deduct, prove it.
 
His son will have continuing complications throughout most of his life. Now if that is not a preexisting condition I don't know what is.

I read an article when a child with a congenital cardiac condition was denied care by BCBS of Texas, but finally got it ok'd. Many people were denied care prior to the ACA, and also do not forget about the lifetime limit cap.
Newborn with Birth Defect Denied Coverage

And that is why Republicans only like the fetus, a infant and baby cost to much. They are pro birth and after that let the infant die. Not all Republicans, but most. Life or money, and the answer is

MONEY.
 
Is Kimmel trying to peddle that NO children with birth defects EVER get medical care? The hospital that treated his kid takes indigents. I see their pleas for donations every day. He's dishonest.
 
The main point that he was bringing up was that because his son was born with a heart defect, that is considered a pre existing condition by the insurance companies, meaning that his son wouldn't have survived if he wasn't who he was. He also said that it is wrong to make parents watch their children die because they can't afford health care.

All his points were spot on.

So you think his baby would have been denied care? You realize that was against the law pre-ACA don't you?
 
The main point that he was bringing up was that because his son was born with a heart defect, that is considered a pre existing condition by the insurance companies, meaning that his son wouldn't have survived if he wasn't who he was. He also said that it is wrong to make parents watch their children die because they can't afford health care.

All his points were spot on.

So you think his baby would have been denied care? You realize that was against the law pre-ACA don't you?

Not his kid, because not only is he famous, but he's also rich.

However.................if that child was born to a man and a woman who work at Wal-Mart prior to the ACA, they wouldn't have been able to afford the money that it would take to heal their child, and it would probably die.

Also, even if the child did live, they would never be able to get health insurance at an affordable rate because of the pre existing condition rule.
 
Do you really think Jimmy Kimmel who;s salary is $10 Million a year and has a net worth of $35 million is on ObamaCare?
 
Sorry libs, we don't have anything called Trump care. We have obama care which isn't worth shit.
 
The main point that he was bringing up was that because his son was born with a heart defect, that is considered a pre existing condition by the insurance companies, meaning that his son wouldn't have survived if he wasn't who he was. He also said that it is wrong to make parents watch their children die because they can't afford health care.

All his points were spot on.

So you think his baby would have been denied care? You realize that was against the law pre-ACA don't you?

Not his kid, because not only is he famous, but he's also rich.

However.................if that child was born to a man and a woman who work at Wal-Mart prior to the ACA, they wouldn't have been able to afford the money that it would take to heal their child, and it would probably die.

Also, even if the child did live, they would never be able to get health insurance at an affordable rate because of the pre existing condition rule.
That is bs! Have you spinners forgotten s-chip and Medicaid? Neither are obamacare and both cover children. So now you want to double dip from the taxpayers?
 
Sorry libs, we don't have anything called Trump care. We have obama care which isn't worth shit.

Actually, the GOP is now like the dog that caught the car. They have been wanting to have the ability to get rid of the ACA for the past 5 years or so, and now that they have it, there is nothing to replace it with, as well as the fact that it is gonna be hard to repeal if 25 million people are going to lose healthcare.

Face it....................the Republicans have painted themselves into a corner, with no way out. If they repeal it, they lose votes because constituents will be pissed about losing their health insurance. If they leave it alone, they will lose votes because they didn't do what they promised in 2016.

Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
 
The main point that he was bringing up was that because his son was born with a heart defect, that is considered a pre existing condition by the insurance companies, meaning that his son wouldn't have survived if he wasn't who he was. He also said that it is wrong to make parents watch their children die because they can't afford health care.

All his points were spot on.

So you think his baby would have been denied care? You realize that was against the law pre-ACA don't you?

Not his kid, because not only is he famous, but he's also rich.

However.................if that child was born to a man and a woman who work at Wal-Mart prior to the ACA, they wouldn't have been able to afford the money that it would take to heal their child, and it would probably die.

Also, even if the child did live, they would never be able to get health insurance at an affordable rate because of the pre existing condition rule.
That is bs! Have you spinners forgotten s-chip and Medicaid? Neither are obamacare and both cover children. So now you want to double dip from the taxpayers?

If both work at Wal Mart, making minimum wage for 40 hours a week, that is roughly 36,000/yr between the both of them.

They would make too much money to qualify for those programs.
 
The main point that he was bringing up was that because his son was born with a heart defect, that is considered a pre existing condition by the insurance companies, meaning that his son wouldn't have survived if he wasn't who he was. He also said that it is wrong to make parents watch their children die because they can't afford health care.

All his points were spot on.

So you think his baby would have been denied care? You realize that was against the law pre-ACA don't you?

Not his kid, because not only is he famous, but he's also rich.

However.................if that child was born to a man and a woman who work at Wal-Mart prior to the ACA, they wouldn't have been able to afford the money that it would take to heal their child, and it would probably die.

Also, even if the child did live, they would never be able to get health insurance at an affordable rate because of the pre existing condition rule.

False. By law, a hospital can not refuse care to anyone based on their ability to pay. I've had a pre-existing condition for 42 years. I've been employed full time for the last 37 of those years and I've never been without healthcare a single day.
 
Sorry libs, we don't have anything called Trump care. We have obama care which isn't worth shit.

Actually, the GOP is now like the dog that caught the car. They have been wanting to have the ability to get rid of the ACA for the past 5 years or so, and now that they have it, there is nothing to replace it with, as well as the fact that it is gonna be hard to repeal if 25 million people are going to lose healthcare.

Face it....................the Republicans have painted themselves into a corner, with no way out. If they repeal it, they lose votes because constituents will be pissed about losing their health insurance. If they leave it alone, they will lose votes because they didn't do what they promised in 2016.

Damned if they do, damned if they don't.
Obamacare is going to fail and 25 million people are going to be uninsured, and the democrats own it 100%. Right in time for the 2018 elections.
 

Forum List

Back
Top