Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by blu, Apr 29, 2010.
I will post in a little bit, let people get some thoughts in first if they want.
The world would be a whole lot nicer without either of them.
What he said.
Now, off we go to the right sub-forum!
Flawed, ignorant premise.
Jihad is mass murder based on Islamic doctrine.
Zionism is Jewish self-determination, guaranteed all people under the UN charter. The original Zionists immigrating to Palestine were pacific, arriving unarmed and without a military.
Under Islam, 60 million Christians and 80 million Hindus have been killed.
Zionists have only killed in self-defense against Muslim aggression, fully permissable under international law.
Martin Luther King, Jr was an avowed Zionist...
[ame=http://www.amazon.com/John-Lewis-Congressman-African-American-Biographies/dp/0766017680]Amazon.com: John Lewis: From Freedom Rider to Congressman (African-American Biographies) (9780766017689): Christine M. Hill: Books[/ame]
Usama bin Ladin is an avowed jihadist.
You have distinguished yourself for being a total fool. Congratulations
Dumb and dumber.
owie...cut to the quick by your rapier wit!
This chat room is not exactly the Algonquin Round Table and you're not exactly Gore Vidal.
The two aren't comparable unless "jihad" is used as a blanket term for all violence perpetrated in the name of Islam. Jihad is righteous destruction of oppression; Zionism is an ideology that calls for oppression. Jihad is only a threat to those who spread corruption and aggression.
Separate names with a comma.