"Jesus was a Liberal... Hitler was a Conservative"

[DiamondDave]

FAIL

Jesus encouraged people to become wanderers like himself.

Also, tending to the sick and injured were among his 'miracles'- free healthcare for anyone in need, for no other reason than they needed it and he could provide it.

Of course, such acts are also to be expected of God's people who are blessed with the Holy Spirit, and it is through their acts that you shall no them and shall know that they serve a loving, just, and merciful God.
​

FAIL

Show the quote where Jesus was for the forced participation in a government run program for the poor....

It was about giving of ONES SELF.... from the goodness of ones heart.... not giving of someone else through confiscation for the misplaced goodness of ones heart

The apostles pooled any funds they came across. They lived collectively.

The community of believers was of one heart and mind, and no one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they had everything in common. With great power the apostles bore witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great favor was accorded them all. There was no needy person among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them, bring the proceeds of the sale, and put them at the feet of the apostles, and they were distributed to each according to need.

Acts 4:32-35

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need...

This was a continuation of how they lived when Jesus was alive.
​

They VOLUNTARILY did their actions... they did not promote the involuntary confiscation of the funds for others along other mindsets to do their charity for them

 

[DiamondDave]

Christ did NOT Mandate ANYTHING from the Collective...

Is not a commandment a mandate?

Liberals want to Mandate Charity in Law...

Christ NEVER Advocated for that.

Yes, he did. God's law, which was the Law of the land when IsraEl had God's blessing and will be again during the 1000-year reign.

Have you never read the bible?

I am trying to find the biblical commandment to confiscate from others to meet the needs of your personal will to donate for the charity you have for 'the poor'

I do remember one along the lines of
You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, or male or female slave, or ox, or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Christians don't believe that OT laws still apply.

The old law was fulfilled. The new law is now in effect.


Otherwise non-Jews would never be allowed in heaven.

 

[RodISHI]

Christ did NOT Mandate ANYTHING from the Collective...

Is not a commandment a mandate?

Liberals want to Mandate Charity in Law...

Christ NEVER Advocated for that.

Yes, he did. God's law, which was the Law of the land when IsraEl had God's blessing and will be again during the 1000-year reign.

Have you never read the bible?

And the actual word Israel means?

The name Israel comes from the Hebrew origin. In Hebrew The meaning of the name Israel is: May God prevail. He struggles with God. God perseveres; contends.

 

[DiamondDave]

Christians don't believe that OT laws still apply.

The old law was fulfilled. The new law is now in effect.


Otherwise non-Jews would never be allowed in heaven.

Really...??

Now you are trying to twist things....

I will go tell the local church that thou shalt not murder does not comply any more

Again... show the commandment for the involuntary confiscation from others to meet the need you personally feel for charity

We'll be waiting

 

[☭proletarian☭]

'Thous Shall not murder' does not apply.

However, the laws of the new covenant also prohibit murder.


It's kinda like how American law prohibits murder, yet the laws under the British crown, which also prohibited murder, no longer apply.


Nice herring, but I don't like seafood.

 

[DiamondDave]

'Thous Shall not murder' does not apply.

However, the laws of the new covenant also prohibit murder.


It's kinda like how American law prohibits murder, yet the laws under the British crown, which also prohibited murder, no longer apply.


Nice herring, but I don't like seafood.

9 of the 10 laws/original commandments of the old testament are held in the new testament (the one out being the law of the sabbath)... and there is not a commandment in the new testament that calls for the involuntary confiscation from others for your personal wish for charity

You should just quit while you are behind, commie

 

[Avatar4321]

Jesus was a Liberal

The Romans who crucified him were Republicans

You do realize that the Roman Republic was dead before Christ was even born dont you?

 

[Avatar4321]

I don't think that liberals nor conservatives are any more charitable than the other. They just differ on the ways charity should be dispensed. An intellectually honest person would understand this.

It's not charity if you are giving away other peoples money.

 

[Avatar4321]

If Jesus were a Librul he would have proposed that the Romans dictate healthcare and how many sticks of kindling people could use to heat their home

Jesus made sure the poor were healed.........a Conservative would have turned them away

So because we dont want the government take away the freedom of people we would turn away the poor? You are one sick and deluded fool.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

commie

Sorry, Mr. Beck, but you'll have to do better than calling upon the spirit of McCarthy.

 

[Wicked Jester]

"Jesus was a Liberal... Hitler was a Conservative"

One of the MANY Ignorant and Dishonest bumper stickers that Liberals have on their cars these days, or that they Repeat to each other when trying to make American Conservatives out to be Genocidal Psychopaths is this TRIPE: "Jesus was a Liberal... Hitler was a Conservative".

Jesus did as Modern Liberals SAY or Claim to do, not as they Actually do in Practice...

Jesus got Dirty with the Least of us and expected us to do the same of Free Will, he didn't Advocate for throwing other People's Money at them in a Failing attempt at Cleansing his Conscience for the Life he lead..

Modern Liberals aren't for doing ANYTHING Personally, aside from giving SOME People all that they want on the backs of someone else's Labors.

Many of them are doing it because they Believe that this is what “Charity” is, because they don’t Acquiesce to a Higher Power…

They see themselves or Select Men as the Higher Power.

And that’s only for those Liberals who are doing it for whatever their False Sense of Charity is... Don’t even get me Started on those who are doing it to Gain and or to Retain Power, which is an Unfortunate number of them.

As for Hitler being a "Conservative"... Please... Nazi = National Socialist German Workers' Party

He was Closer to the Agenda of the Modern American Left than Jesus could have EVER have been by ANYONE'S Interpretation.

When Liberals say "Jesus was a Liberal... Hitler was a Conservative", they are REALLY Comparing American Conservatives to Jew Killers… There’s no more or less to it than that.

If they were Comparing Political Ideologies, they wouldn't be able to say a Word that was True in that Comparison… It’s why they Never lend Substance to these Trite Platitudes.

"The National Socialist Program advocated uniting the German people (through pan-Germanism), implementing profit-sharing in industry, nationalizing trusts, providing an extensive welfare state, instituting government control of the media, and persecuting Jews..."

National Socialism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Now, aside from the Issues that Hilter had with the Communist Jews upon his Rise to Power and to the Holocaust it eventually lead to, the Political Ideologies of the Nazis were FAR MORE in Line with the Modern Liberal than ANYHTING Jesus Advocated for, and Certainly NOT anything that American Conservatives are Advocating for today.

Jesus Advocated for Individual Action based in Free Will, not a Collective Mandate from a Government Institution that Required "Charity" as a Matter of Law.

“Charity” Ceases to be Charity when it is Forced.

This is a Concept that Eludes the (m)inds of Most Liberals… Primarily because the Ignorant Emotion and Reaction that Drives them on a Daily leaves them Incapable of Understanding things that are Generally Accepted as Common Sense to Most Thinking People.

Anyone who Feels that Jesus would have been for Modern American Liberalism, is either Ignorant of History or Dishonest... In some Cases, both.

It’s this Simple… Modern Liberalism NEGATES “Free Will” just as Nazism did before it, something that is at the Core of what True Charity is and always has been.

Either way, if you are a Liberal who says, "Jesus was a Liberal... Hitler was a Conservative", please do some Research and Educate yourself if you are Capable.

You only sound Intelligent to other Ignorant and Dishonest Liberals.

If that's enough for you to get to Sleep at Night or gets you Accepted in your Circles, then so be it...

Just Know that you are a Fool.

Copyright ©2010 - americanfreepress.org/tha malcontent​

peace...

Jesus couldn't have been a liberal.

He was a carpenter who actually had a job!

Definitely not a liberal!

 

[Vel]

FAIL

Jesus encouraged people to become wanderers like himself.

Also, tending to the sick and injured were among his 'miracles'- free healthcare for anyone in need, for no other reason than they needed it and he could provide it.

Of course, such acts are also to be expected of God's people who are blessed with the Holy Spirit, and it is through their acts that you shall no them and shall know that they serve a loving, just, and merciful God.
​

FAIL

Show the quote where Jesus was for the forced participation in a government run program for the poor....

It was about giving of ONES SELF.... from the goodness of ones heart.... not giving of someone else through confiscation for the misplaced goodness of ones heart

The apostles pooled any funds they came across. They lived collectively.

The community of believers was of one heart and mind, and no one claimed that any of his possessions was his own, but they had everything in common. With great power the apostles bore witness to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great favor was accorded them all. There was no needy person among them, for those who owned property or houses would sell them, bring the proceeds of the sale, and put them at the feet of the apostles, and they were distributed to each according to need.

Acts 4:32-35

From each according to his ability, to each according to his need...

This was a continuation of how they lived when Jesus was alive.
​

OK. I have to ask. How many homeless people are living with you? Or wait.. you sold all your possessions so that you can live collectively? Who do you share your shoes with. Please tell us that you practice what you preach and own no worldly possessions above that which another might have. I bet it's a library computer you post from too.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Jesus couldn't have been a liberal.

He was a carpenter who actually had a job!

Definitely not a liberal!

He quit his job and became a wandering bum, remember?

 

[☭proletarian☭]

OK. I have to ask. How many homeless people are living with you? Or wait.. you sold all your possessions so that you can live collectively? Who do you share your shoes with. Please tell us that you practice what you preach and own no worldly possessions above that which another might have. I bet it's a library computer you post from too.

It's not my fairy tale.

 

[☭proletarian☭]

Is Vel retarded?

 

[Liability]

Jesus was a Liberal

The Romans who crucified him were Republicans

Jesus was a conservative. He valued morality. He couldn't be a liberal.

The Romans Centurians who crucified Jesus were unprincipled soldiers for the Statists. Thus, they were actually much more akin to the modern American liberal who are all fully devout Statists.

 

[Care4all]

If Jesus were a Librul he would have proposed that the Romans dictate healthcare and how many sticks of kindling people could use to heat their home

FAIL

Jesus encouraged people to become wanderers like himself.

Also, tending to the sick and injured were among his 'miracles'- free healthcare for anyone in need, for no other reason than they needed it and he could provide it.

Of course, such acts are also to be expected of God's people who are blessed with the Holy Spirit, and it is through their acts that you shall no them and shall know that they serve a loving, just, and merciful God.
​

FAIL

Show the quote where Jesus was for the forced participation in a government run program for the poor....

It was about giving of ONES SELF.... from the goodness of ones heart.... not giving of someone else through confiscation for the misplaced goodness of ones heart

FAIL

Please show us where Jesus said it would be wrong for the government of the people, taking care of the people in great need?

Do you really believe it would have bothered Jesus if the government of the people provided for the neediest or the least among them and would have told the government them doing such would have been a sin or wrong?

PLEASEEEEEEE Dave....!!!

Care

 

[Care4all]

Jesus was a Liberal

The Romans who crucified him were Republicans

Jesus was a conservative. He valued morality. He couldn't be a liberal.

The Romans Centurians who crucified Jesus were unprincipled soldiers for the Statists. Thus, they were actually much more akin to the modern American liberal who are all fully devout Statists.

it is sickening to read such bull crap Liability....

Jesus was not a conservative he was liberal in every manner of his life....the Pharisees and Sadducee were conservative...and Jesus constantly reprimanded and corrected them for their narrowmindedness.

Jesus, forgave the adulteress on the spot...(he did not follow the Law by doing this)

Jesus let the town whore clean his feet with her tears. and hair..

Jesus took from someone who only had 5 loaves of bread and 5 fish and fed 5000 strange people with them.....

Jesus said He was on Earth to be with the sinners, not the righteous....so He felt comfortable being around those that are imperfect.

I agree with Rightwinger.... Jesus was liberal.....not in the political sense, but as a person.

He was NOT conservative, in any manner....he went against conservative thinking...he was AGAINST the conservative leaders of the church/Synagogue at the time...and their misconstrued ideas of what the Law meant.

Liberal, is one of the most beautiful words in our dictionary....it is NOT a dirty word as you conservatives have tried to make it the last decade or two....

Care

 

[B L Zeebub]

What about this one Maldemerde

I could not care less what jesus was, all religion is a right load of old bollock