Jane Mayer: Accuser Told Ronan Farrow She Wasn’t Sure of Story

The Purge

Platinum Member
Aug 16, 2018
17,881
7,863
400
Read more at
www.nationalreview.com ^ | September 24, 2018 9:25 AM | By Jack Crowe

Jane Mayer said on Monday that Deborah Ramirez, who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexually harassing her, told her New Yorker colleague Ronan Farrow that she couldn’t be sure of the Supreme Court nominee’s guilt.

Confronted with a New York Times report indicating Ramirez expressed doubts about Kavanaugh’s guilt to former Yale classmates, Mayer said Ramirez shared those doubts before they published their bombshell report on Sunday.

“To Ronan she said she wasn’t absolutely certain, she needed to make certain before she was going to say anything publicly. She remembered the specifics, the graphic specifics, and she tried to remember for sure who that man was who was in her face,” she told MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough.“With all due respect to the New York Times, which is the best paper in America, just because they couldn’t get the story and speak to her or find the person that we found, who remembered it from back then, doesn’t mean it’s not true.”

Ramirez, who opted to come forward after learning Senate Democrats were independently investigating the incident, claims Kavanaugh drunkenly thrust his penis in her face during a dorm party at Yale when he was a freshman.

Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the charge and painted it as a politically motivated smear in the same vein as the allegation that he pinned down Christine Blasey Ford and tried to remove her clothing when they were in high-school.

There are no eyewitness accounts included in the story and several of Kavanaugh’s friends and roommates from his time at Yale, some of whom were said to have been in the room, released a statement denying that the assault ever took place.

Ford and Kavanaugh are scheduled to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday.


I always figured that Ronan was a decent guy..after all he did a very thorough investigation of Harvey Weinstein, but with this story..he just DESTROYED any credibility he used to have. I considered him fair even though he is a liberal, but with this, he investigated it, and found NO ONE to verify her story and he still ran with it
 
Read more at
www.nationalreview.com ^ | September 24, 2018 9:25 AM | By Jack Crowe

Jane Mayer said on Monday that Deborah Ramirez, who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexually harassing her, told her New Yorker colleague Ronan Farrow that she couldn’t be sure of the Supreme Court nominee’s guilt.

Confronted with a New York Times report indicating Ramirez expressed doubts about Kavanaugh’s guilt to former Yale classmates, Mayer said Ramirez shared those doubts before they published their bombshell report on Sunday.

“To Ronan she said she wasn’t absolutely certain, she needed to make certain before she was going to say anything publicly. She remembered the specifics, the graphic specifics, and she tried to remember for sure who that man was who was in her face,” she told MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough.“With all due respect to the New York Times, which is the best paper in America, just because they couldn’t get the story and speak to her or find the person that we found, who remembered it from back then, doesn’t mean it’s not true.”

Ramirez, who opted to come forward after learning Senate Democrats were independently investigating the incident, claims Kavanaugh drunkenly thrust his penis in her face during a dorm party at Yale when he was a freshman.

Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the charge and painted it as a politically motivated smear in the same vein as the allegation that he pinned down Christine Blasey Ford and tried to remove her clothing when they were in high-school.

There are no eyewitness accounts included in the story and several of Kavanaugh’s friends and roommates from his time at Yale, some of whom were said to have been in the room, released a statement denying that the assault ever took place.

Ford and Kavanaugh are scheduled to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday.


I always figured that Ronan was a decent guy..after all he did a very thorough investigation of Harvey Weinstein, but with this story..he just DESTROYED any credibility he used to have. I considered him fair even though he is a liberal, but with this, he investigated it, and found NO ONE to verify her story and he still ran with it
Like I said all progressives are fucked in the head
 
Read more at
www.nationalreview.com ^ | September 24, 2018 9:25 AM | By Jack Crowe

Jane Mayer said on Monday that Deborah Ramirez, who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexually harassing her, told her New Yorker colleague Ronan Farrow that she couldn’t be sure of the Supreme Court nominee’s guilt.

Confronted with a New York Times report indicating Ramirez expressed doubts about Kavanaugh’s guilt to former Yale classmates, Mayer said Ramirez shared those doubts before they published their bombshell report on Sunday.

“To Ronan she said she wasn’t absolutely certain, she needed to make certain before she was going to say anything publicly. She remembered the specifics, the graphic specifics, and she tried to remember for sure who that man was who was in her face,” she told MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough.“With all due respect to the New York Times, which is the best paper in America, just because they couldn’t get the story and speak to her or find the person that we found, who remembered it from back then, doesn’t mean it’s not true.”

Ramirez, who opted to come forward after learning Senate Democrats were independently investigating the incident, claims Kavanaugh drunkenly thrust his penis in her face during a dorm party at Yale when he was a freshman.

Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the charge and painted it as a politically motivated smear in the same vein as the allegation that he pinned down Christine Blasey Ford and tried to remove her clothing when they were in high-school.

There are no eyewitness accounts included in the story and several of Kavanaugh’s friends and roommates from his time at Yale, some of whom were said to have been in the room, released a statement denying that the assault ever took place.

Ford and Kavanaugh are scheduled to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday.


I always figured that Ronan was a decent guy..after all he did a very thorough investigation of Harvey Weinstein, but with this story..he just DESTROYED any credibility he used to have. I considered him fair even though he is a liberal, but with this, he investigated it, and found NO ONE to verify her story and he still ran with it
Like I said all progressives are fucked in the head
They are not Democrats, nor liberals nor progressives....I am calling them from now on, what ALL OF THEM ARE....ABNORMAL
 
42450988_1542624565839479_363937876347453440_n.jpg
 
Read more at
www.nationalreview.com ^ | September 24, 2018 9:25 AM | By Jack Crowe

Jane Mayer said on Monday that Deborah Ramirez, who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexually harassing her, told her New Yorker colleague Ronan Farrow that she couldn’t be sure of the Supreme Court nominee’s guilt.

Confronted with a New York Times report indicating Ramirez expressed doubts about Kavanaugh’s guilt to former Yale classmates, Mayer said Ramirez shared those doubts before they published their bombshell report on Sunday.

“To Ronan she said she wasn’t absolutely certain, she needed to make certain before she was going to say anything publicly. She remembered the specifics, the graphic specifics, and she tried to remember for sure who that man was who was in her face,” she told MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough.“With all due respect to the New York Times, which is the best paper in America, just because they couldn’t get the story and speak to her or find the person that we found, who remembered it from back then, doesn’t mean it’s not true.”

Ramirez, who opted to come forward after learning Senate Democrats were independently investigating the incident, claims Kavanaugh drunkenly thrust his penis in her face during a dorm party at Yale when he was a freshman.

Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the charge and painted it as a politically motivated smear in the same vein as the allegation that he pinned down Christine Blasey Ford and tried to remove her clothing when they were in high-school.

There are no eyewitness accounts included in the story and several of Kavanaugh’s friends and roommates from his time at Yale, some of whom were said to have been in the room, released a statement denying that the assault ever took place.

Ford and Kavanaugh are scheduled to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday.


I always figured that Ronan was a decent guy..after all he did a very thorough investigation of Harvey Weinstein, but with this story..he just DESTROYED any credibility he used to have. I considered him fair even though he is a liberal, but with this, he investigated it, and found NO ONE to verify her story and he still ran with it
Like I said all progressives are fucked in the head
They are not Democrats, nor liberals nor progressives....I am calling them from now on, what ALL OF THEM ARE....ABNORMAL

Actually what they really are is insurgents who poisoned the deep state and now are attacking constitutional judicial processes.
 
Do we have a photo yet of the new accuser? Have yet to see one....is she a bulldog like Ford? It's always the bulldogs that come out with these uncorroborated fairy tales. Ever notice that? Many are these feminist bulldogs too!:113: the uber-man haters.
 
Do we have a photo yet of the new accuser? Have yet to see one....is she a bulldog like Ford? It's always the bulldogs that come out with these uncorroborated fairy tales. Ever notice that? Many are these feminist bulldogs too!:113: the uber-man haters.
Yes. The answer to your question is yes.
 
Do we have a photo yet of the new accuser? Have yet to see one....is she a bulldog like Ford? It's always the bulldogs that come out with these uncorroborated fairy tales. Ever notice that? Many are these feminist bulldogs too!:113: the uber-man haters.

She's a Hispanic who was wearing a T-shirt that said 'Puerto Rico' on the front in a picture in the New Yorker magazine that broke the story.
Besides attempting to disrupt the confirmation, devious Dems are also appealing to the female Hispanic vote in the mid-terms.
The picture is indeed, not a coincidence, but part of a broader left wing conspiracy!
 
Do we have a photo yet of the new accuser? Have yet to see one....is she a bulldog like Ford? It's always the bulldogs that come out with these uncorroborated fairy tales. Ever notice that? Many are these feminist bulldogs too!:113: the uber-man haters.



That's the second liar over there...that's her photo. Farrow's photo on the side.


9oPhIG9.jpg
 
The New Yorker sent investigative reporters to find witnesses and found no one. Ramirez called old schoolmates and couldn't verify her own story. Except it wasn't her story. It was the story lawyers told her to tell.
 
The DemonRats have a special ability......everything they touch becomes a circus! they are totally sick in the head! :cuckoo:


So ....who is going to be their third accuser ?

This one?....you never know!:dunno:






67cafcde783d0be32d56d09796835e927e130824a7a9da503532fc189b1a8f24.jpg
 
The New Yorker sent investigative reporters to find witnesses and found no one. Ramirez called old schoolmates and couldn't verify her own story. Except it wasn't her story. It was the story lawyers told her to tell.
"Funny" all the witnesses corroborate kavanaugh, not the Democrat false accusers
Blabbermouth Ramirez didn't do herself any favors by telling her friends she didn't know what happened until the lawyers told her.
 
The New Yorker sent investigative reporters to find witnesses and found no one. Ramirez called old schoolmates and couldn't verify her own story. Except it wasn't her story. It was the story lawyers told her to tell.
"Funny" all the witnesses corroborate kavanaugh, not the Democrat false accusers
Blabbermouth Ramirez didn't do herself any favors by telling her friends she didn't know what happened until the lawyers told her.

And people wonder why it took Puerto Rico a whole year to fix most of their electrical grid, with help!
Sheesh!
 
Read more at
www.nationalreview.com ^ | September 24, 2018 9:25 AM | By Jack Crowe

Jane Mayer said on Monday that Deborah Ramirez, who accused Brett Kavanaugh of sexually harassing her, told her New Yorker colleague Ronan Farrow that she couldn’t be sure of the Supreme Court nominee’s guilt.

Confronted with a New York Times report indicating Ramirez expressed doubts about Kavanaugh’s guilt to former Yale classmates, Mayer said Ramirez shared those doubts before they published their bombshell report on Sunday.

“To Ronan she said she wasn’t absolutely certain, she needed to make certain before she was going to say anything publicly. She remembered the specifics, the graphic specifics, and she tried to remember for sure who that man was who was in her face,” she told MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough.“With all due respect to the New York Times, which is the best paper in America, just because they couldn’t get the story and speak to her or find the person that we found, who remembered it from back then, doesn’t mean it’s not true.”

Ramirez, who opted to come forward after learning Senate Democrats were independently investigating the incident, claims Kavanaugh drunkenly thrust his penis in her face during a dorm party at Yale when he was a freshman.

Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the charge and painted it as a politically motivated smear in the same vein as the allegation that he pinned down Christine Blasey Ford and tried to remove her clothing when they were in high-school.

There are no eyewitness accounts included in the story and several of Kavanaugh’s friends and roommates from his time at Yale, some of whom were said to have been in the room, released a statement denying that the assault ever took place.

Ford and Kavanaugh are scheduled to testify publicly before the Senate Judiciary Committee Thursday.


I always figured that Ronan was a decent guy..after all he did a very thorough investigation of Harvey Weinstein, but with this story..he just DESTROYED any credibility he used to have. I considered him fair even though he is a liberal, but with this, he investigated it, and found NO ONE to verify her story and he still ran with it

Doesn't surprise me as it took her six days to decide she even remembered anything had happened at all.

Neither she nor Ford would be considered credible witnesses to anything.
 

Forum List

Back
Top