I've watched CNN for the last two days, including just now. The discussion of sanction Russian oil is shot down, not one mention of XL Pipeline

[Mac-7]

They don't mention Keystone because it's not happening. Pretty simple.

But it should happen

 

[surada]

But it should happen

You really want the Chinese to make a profit.

 

[Moonglow]

Because you are posing a stupid question.

A question which you very well know the answer to, all while ignoring the greater point.

Just like conveyor belts don't make boxes, and guns don't make bullets.

The point is, that the infrastructure is in place.

The manpower, the rigs, to technology, everything.

However, you are intentionally obtuse for the same reason the assholes on CNN are...you prefer the global community over a national one.

Fact.

Domestic production can exceed demand which DOES affect price.

This was proven very recently.

So stop pissing in the water with 'corky question time', shit bird.

The XL is for Canadian oil you dipshit not US oil. The US leads the world in oil and natural gas production, we already produce more than we consume and we export it. Now, the OP claims having one pipeline out of hundreds of thousands of miles of existing pipeline will increase production in the US. A pipeline does not extract petroleum it transports it just like trains, shits and trucks. The Canadian oil is being transported and doing the same job as a pipeline.
Crude extraction is increasing and has been since 2021. Companies are buying Russian oil because that is what capitalist do.

 

[Moonglow]

But it should happen

What will it change?

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

Well, they should build their pipeline across Canada to the ocean.

A pipeline from Canada to China?

Under the Pacific Ocean, the most tectonically active zone on the planet...an oil pipeline.

K...

 

[Moonglow]

The point is that the infrastructure is in place.

The ability to perform the work exists.

This whole op can be up and running very quickly.

Then get off yer ass and go pump oil.

 

[surada]

View attachment 611152

A pipeline from Canada to China?

Under the Pacific Ocean, the most tectonically active zone on the planet...an oil pipeline.

K...

They can move it to tankers.

 

[Moonglow]

View attachment 611152

A pipeline from Canada to China?

Under the Pacific Ocean, the most tectonically active zone on the planet...an oil pipeline.

K...

He said to the ocean not through the ocean.

 

[Moonglow]

They can move it to tankers.

Yet it will not increase oil production.

 

[surada]

Yet it will not increase oil production.

This keystone XL doesn't benefit the US taxpayer or consumer at all. They have been lying about it for 11 years.

 

[Mac-7]

What will it change?

More fossil fuel for the world market including America

 

[surada]

More fossil fuel for the world market including America

None of that will be sold in the US.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

The US leads the world in oil and natural gas production, we already produce more than we consume and we export it.

Wrong

EIA expects U.S. petroleum trade to shift toward net imports during 2022 - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

www.eia.gov

Now, the OP claims having one pipeline out of hundreds of thousands of miles of existing pipeline will increase production in the US.

Still being intentionally dim...i expect nothing less...refer back to my previous point shitbird.

A pipeline does not extract petroleum it transports it just like trains, shits and trucks.

Still sticking to your retarded guns...you are hopeless.

The Canadian oil is being transported and doing the same job as a pipeline.

Wrong...thus pipeline.

Ok Veronica...If TRUCKS did as good a job as PIPELINES...we wouldn't require PIPELINES...

Dense as uranium.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

They can move it to tankers.

psssst...Russia is right next door...they already have deals and a pipeline in place.

 

[Mac-7]

None of that will be sold in the US.

Even if it were true it would make no difference and still be a positive

 

[surada]

Wrong

EIA expects U.S. petroleum trade to shift toward net imports during 2022 - U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA)

www.eia.gov

Still being intentionally dim...i expect nothing less...refer back to my previous point shitbird.


Still sticking to your retarded guns...you are hopeless.


Wrong...thus pipeline.

Ok Veronica...If TRUCKS did as good a job as PIPELINES...we wouldn't require PIPELINES...

Dense as uranium.

TransCanada has lots of unused pipelines in the Midwest. This is a scam. Right off the top they will put millions in their pockets.
.

 

[surada]

Even if it were true it would make no difference and still be a positive

Not to the US.

 

[Gabe Lackmann]

TransCanada has lots of unused pipelines in the Midwest. This is a scam. Right off the top they will put millions in their pockets.
.

Will it push oil prices down?

Will it create jobs?

If the result is lower oil/gas prices, and an economic boost... why would you care?

 

[surada]

Will it push oil prices down?

Will it create jobs?

If the result is lower oil/gas prices, and an economic boost... why would you care?

No and no. This stuff is headed for the specialty market overseas. Jobs will go to pipe line companies and they're temporary.

 

[jwoodie]

No and no. This stuff is headed for the specialty market overseas. Jobs will go to pipe line companies and they're temporary.

Ever heard the term "fungible?" Look it up.