It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose?

[Rustic]

Lol
Yep,
The Clintons are the lowest of life forms...

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The democrats are so intent on bringing Trump into this that they will lose the whole Epstein case.

 

[The Purge]

Actually, Michael van der Galien observes, the Vanity Fair article is notable for its lack of any dirt on Trump:

What makes Vanity Fair‘s report double fascinating is that the leftist magazine clearly implies that Epstein doesn’t have any dirt on Trump himself. On Twitter, leftist users have been tweeting hopefully about how this could ruin Trump’s presidency. Vanity Fair knows better. When push comes to shove, this case will involve high-ranking and extremely influential Democrats.

So far? Sure, but don’t bet the farm on this being a single-party issue. A man like Epstein would make sure to suck up to players across the spectrum to protect himself, or at least protect himself by digging up dirt on both sides of the aisle. We have yet to see the full scope of Epstein’s sins, and it’s still an open question as to whether we ever will.

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...

 

[Rustic]

And the funny thing is, Epstein is/was a true blue progressive if there ever was one... lol

 

[skye]

Oh Epstein....

why did you have to accept money from Israel... in order to blackmail American politicians???? why.

you are scum Epstein .....and those who paid you...are scum too.

it's all in the open now !!!

Scum....................

 

[skye]

the truth is the truth...

so kill me

 

[skye]

Doesn't look good does it... for Israel having all this ties to this Epstein..blackmailing all these American idiots .....sexually ...videotaping them ....

Epstein being paid by Israel.....doesnt look good....I think..........

Oh well...... who is going to tell them they are scum? and that their story is over?

 

[flacaltenn]

Wait, there's more.

Netanyahu: Barak connected with pedophile, sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former prime minister Ehud Barak intensified their rivalry on Sunday with below the belt attacks, including Netanyahu accusing Barak of connections to alleged pedophile and sex-trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. ...

Acosta dodges when asked if Epstein was an 'intelligence asset'

Likud to A-G: Investigate Barak and his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein

Coulter: Epstein Had A "State Sponsor" Behind Him, Was Used For "Blackmailing Purposes"

Coulter: Epstein Had A "State Sponsor" Behind Him, Was Used For "Blackmailing Purposes"
Posted By Ian Schwartz
On Date July 9, 2019
Conservative author Ann Coulter lays out her theory that sex offender Jeffrey Epstein had a "state sponsor" or "powerful people" behind him and he used to rope in other powerful people for blackmailing purposes.
ANN COULTER: Epstein according to both the girls accounts, he wanted them to have sex with powerful men, come back to him and report on it, describe what they wanted what their fetishes were and he had cameras throughout the house so this is obviously for blackmailing purposes.
It just seems to me something much bigger is behind this — perhaps a state sponsor — powerful enough people... It just seems to me there’s something a very powerful force behind what’s going on here and I am still nervous about this not coming to a conclusion, somehow this getting compromised,” she added.

So Coulter "has a theory"... That's not news. It's speculation.. And Epstein had a LOT of foreign contacts. Maybe more foreign friends than domestic ones..

And Netanyahu ACCUSES Barak of connections... ..... ...... Well, that's politics. Probably the connection is Epstein got taken to the Synagogue in Tel Aviv by Barak...

The guy is TOO PERSONALLY COMPROMISED to be an effective spy... This is not bloody likely.. If a HOSTILE intel service wants to silence you -- they BLACKMAIL YOU... And if you're blackmail-able -- you get booted from the spy ranks....

That's how it is man... He's a walking liability to ANY global Intel service... Couldn't even get SECURITY CLEARANCES with his baggage....

 

[Penelope]

Thomas J. Barrack Jr. has to be investigated as well.

 

[skye]

In my opinion,spy is not the right word to define sleazebag Jeffrey Epstein.

Blackmailer is a better one.



blackmail (someone) into (something)
"To coerce someone to take a certain action by threatening to expose something about them."

"To force a person to do something by threatening to reveal some secret about the person."



And that's what he did. he filmed very famous, important people, many of them politicians,having sex with minors.

Who paid him? well......the rabbit hole is deep but hopefully we'll find out.

 

[georgephillip]

Israel or Russia. My money's on Israel because of Epstein's connections with former Israeli head of Intelligence Ehud Barak.

Sexual blackmail is typical Mossad MO.

So Epstein was compromising influential people and politicians with sex from young girls and was collecting photos and videos to enable blackmail of people for Israel's political benefit?

More and more information is spewing out of the festering Epstein black hole of sex slavery, pedophilia, and rape.

Trump's head will eventually poke out of the Epstein black hole.

It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose?

It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose?
By John R. Schindler • 07/10/19 5:29pm

...Ward writes:
He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)
Wait, what?

So, Acosta, according to himself, backed off on prosecuting Epstein back in 2007, despite the possession of ample evidence proving his guilt, because he “belonged to intelligence.” Whose intelligence, exactly? is the first of many questions that arise here.

This claim was met with an appropriate degree of skepticism, and Acosta had a chance to explain what he meant in a press conference this afternoon. On camera, Acosta maintained that he did the best he could with that case, while admitting that it hardly looks like a fair punishment now.

The intelligence issue came up, and Acosta’s response was bizarre. He punted on setting the record straight, instead proffering this strange word salad when asked about Ward’s reporting:
So there has been reporting to that effect and let me say, there’s been reporting to a lot of effects in this case, not just now but over the years and, again, I would hesitant to take this reporting as fact. This was a case that was brought by our office, it was brought based on the facts and I look at the reporting and others, I can’t address it directly because of our guidelines, but I can tell you that a lot of reporting is going down rabbit holes.
To anyone acquainted with our nation’s capital, that’s a non-denial denial of an epic kind. Given the chance to refute Ward’s report, specifically that the Epstein case involved intelligence matters, Acosta did nothing of the sort. Indeed, he functionally admitted that it’s true.

What then can we conclude at this point? It appears that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in intelligence work, of some kind, for someone—and it probably wasn’t American intelligence either. The U.S. Intelligence Community is lenient about the private habits of high-value agents or informants, but they won’t countenance running sex trafficking rings for minors on American soil, for years. While it’s plausible that Epstein was sharing some information with the FBI—many criminals do so to buy themselves some insurance—it’s implausible that he was mainly working for the Americans.

Who are the suspects then? It seems awfully coincidental that Epstein’s best pal and business partner for decades has been Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite and daughter of the late Robert Maxwell, the media mogul who died under mysterious circumstances in 1991. Something of a Bond villain turned real life, Maxwell loved the limelight, despite being a swindler and a spy. British counterintelligence assessed that Maxwell was working for the KGB, while pervasive allegations that he was working for Mossad too are equally plausible.
Since the lines between Russian intelligence, Israeli intelligence and organized crime can get remarkably blurry in practice, as I’ve explained previously, assessing whom Epstein’s been working for may prove difficult to answer with any precision. But we have a suspect list to start asking questions.

What’s not in doubt is that a sex trafficking ring centered on minors, which involved numerous global VIPs in compromising situations, would be of high interest to quite a few intelligence services. The Epstein saga seems certain to get even more unpleasant and interesting.

More and more information is spewing out of the festering Epstein black hole of sex slavery, pedophilia, and rape.

Trump's head will eventually poke out of the Epstein black hole.

It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose?

Your link:

"The intelligence issue came up, and Acosta’s response was bizarre. He punted on setting the record straight, instead proffering this strange word salad when asked about Ward’s reporting:

"'So there has been reporting to that effect and let me say, there’s been reporting to a lot of effects in this case, not just now but over the years and, again, I would hesitant to take this reporting as fact. This was a case that was brought by our office, it was brought based on the facts and I look at the reporting and others, I can’t address it directly because of our guidelines, but I can tell you that a lot of reporting is going down rabbit holes.'"

I'm inclined to agree with you about Epstein and Israel; I wonder what effect, if any, this will have on 2020?

 

[skye]

 

[Aletheia4u]

Israel or Russia. My money's on Israel because of Epstein's connections with former Israeli head of Intelligence Ehud Barak.

Sexual blackmail is typical Mossad MO.

So Epstein was compromising influential people and politicians with sex from young girls and was collecting photos and videos to enable blackmail of people for Israel's political benefit?

More and more information is spewing out of the festering Epstein black hole of sex slavery, pedophilia, and rape.

Trump's head will eventually poke out of the Epstein black hole.

It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose?

It Sure Looks Like Jeffrey Epstein Was a Spy—But Whose?
By John R. Schindler • 07/10/19 5:29pm

...Ward writes:
He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had “been told” to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. “I was told Epstein ‘belonged to intelligence’ and to leave it alone,” he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)
Wait, what?

So, Acosta, according to himself, backed off on prosecuting Epstein back in 2007, despite the possession of ample evidence proving his guilt, because he “belonged to intelligence.” Whose intelligence, exactly? is the first of many questions that arise here.

This claim was met with an appropriate degree of skepticism, and Acosta had a chance to explain what he meant in a press conference this afternoon. On camera, Acosta maintained that he did the best he could with that case, while admitting that it hardly looks like a fair punishment now.

The intelligence issue came up, and Acosta’s response was bizarre. He punted on setting the record straight, instead proffering this strange word salad when asked about Ward’s reporting:
So there has been reporting to that effect and let me say, there’s been reporting to a lot of effects in this case, not just now but over the years and, again, I would hesitant to take this reporting as fact. This was a case that was brought by our office, it was brought based on the facts and I look at the reporting and others, I can’t address it directly because of our guidelines, but I can tell you that a lot of reporting is going down rabbit holes.
To anyone acquainted with our nation’s capital, that’s a non-denial denial of an epic kind. Given the chance to refute Ward’s report, specifically that the Epstein case involved intelligence matters, Acosta did nothing of the sort. Indeed, he functionally admitted that it’s true.

What then can we conclude at this point? It appears that Jeffrey Epstein was involved in intelligence work, of some kind, for someone—and it probably wasn’t American intelligence either. The U.S. Intelligence Community is lenient about the private habits of high-value agents or informants, but they won’t countenance running sex trafficking rings for minors on American soil, for years. While it’s plausible that Epstein was sharing some information with the FBI—many criminals do so to buy themselves some insurance—it’s implausible that he was mainly working for the Americans.

Who are the suspects then? It seems awfully coincidental that Epstein’s best pal and business partner for decades has been Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite and daughter of the late Robert Maxwell, the media mogul who died under mysterious circumstances in 1991. Something of a Bond villain turned real life, Maxwell loved the limelight, despite being a swindler and a spy. British counterintelligence assessed that Maxwell was working for the KGB, while pervasive allegations that he was working for Mossad too are equally plausible.
Since the lines between Russian intelligence, Israeli intelligence and organized crime can get remarkably blurry in practice, as I’ve explained previously, assessing whom Epstein’s been working for may prove difficult to answer with any precision. But we have a suspect list to start asking questions.

What’s not in doubt is that a sex trafficking ring centered on minors, which involved numerous global VIPs in compromising situations, would be of high interest to quite a few intelligence services. The Epstein saga seems certain to get even more unpleasant and interesting.

Most likely, that he was supplying sex for the Elites and Democrat politicians. He was just a school teacher. And he didn't have a business. But he was released from jail during the day to take care of what?

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Let the chips fall where the may.

I have no problem with the truth.

Until Trump is implicated.

Ain't gonna happen. If it does, the accuser will have all the credibility of Christine Ford

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Trump has nothing to do with this. Nothing. Remember how foolish the shitstain obama sounded when he constantly said Bush McCain. It sounds even more foolish when it's Trump Epstein soon to become R Kelly Epstein.