Predictions:
1. The Ryan-Biden debate will end in a draw.
2. The second debate between Romney and Hussein will end in a draw.
Both debates will end in dead heats for the same reasons:
1. Neither Biden nor Hussein can defend their foreign policy records; so they will paint them with the usual International community whitewash.
2. Romney and Ryan will wrap themselves in the flag to no avail.
If they were playing chess Hussein would be maneuvering for a draw because he knows he cannot win. American voters already know that Husseins Arab Spring handed Egypt and Libya to the Muslim Brotherhood. Americans voters know about the attacks on our embassies around the world. Americans know that the war against Islamic fundamentalists is ongoing regardless of Husseins denial and Osama bin Ladens demise.
Nothing either candidate will say about those issues is a mind-changer. Not one of Husseins failures will cost him a single vote on November 6. Romney wrapping himself in the flag will not gain him a single vote on November 6.
Ryan
If economic talk does not put viewers to sleep, or make them surf on outta there, Ryans biggest guns should open fire when the debate gets around to foreign policy because that is where Biden is most vulnerable. Everyone knows that Ryan is well-versed in economic issues. Thats not enough. He better be prepared on UN treaties as well as prepared to defend how Americans feel about broader foreign policy issues if he expects more than a draw.
When then-Senator Biden was chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee he tried his damnedest to ratify the LOST. On top of the LOST he supported every unratified United Nations treaty ever written. Ryan has only to ask Biden one question: Why do you want to give the United Nations the authority to tax the American people?
In the event Biden is dumb enough to answer, Ryan can show that the authority to tax is hidden in every UN treaty no matter what it is called. Even if Biden skirts around the issue with double-talk, his decades of vulnerability rubs off on Hussein more effectively than a bumper-sticker one-liner.
NOTE: Ryans staff should remind him that Tea Partiers defeated Richard Lugar in his nomination fight. Lugar was Bidens strongest Republican ally in trying to ratify the LOST.
Were I debating Biden, I would simply call him a goddamned traitor and show why. Ryan cannot say it my way, but he can use UN treaties to show exactly how Biden feels about this country. In case you have doubts these excerpts could have been written with Biden in mind:
U.N. treaties mean LOST U.S. sovereignty (Washington Times 07/25/2012)
By Sen. James M. Inhofe and Sen. Jim DeMint
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
.: United States Senator James Inhofe :: Press Room :.
Romney
Naturally, Romney is the main attraction. Hussein does not have Bidens long history of betraying this country that Romney can attack; nevertheless, Husseins vulnerability in foreign policy is no less than Bidens. Husseins brief time in the Senate, plus four years in the White House, is more than enough time to prove his love for the United Nations coupled with his bitter, near pathological, hatred for this country. The trick is get Hussein to defend his hatred so it becomes obvious.
American Communists, with a lot of help from the MSM, have been getting away with International community garbage since 1945. Romney will be lucky to get a draw if he plays Husseins foreign policy game. Romneys best weapon is Husseins need to guard his words. No matter how well Hussein prepares if Romney brings the foreign policy debate around to the United Nations, UN treaties, and sovereignty, I guarantee Hussein will crack. No American can justify the United Nations over sovereignty; least of all Hussein who is as shallow as the rhetoric and platitudes he has been spewing around since 2008.
Finally, presidential debates give new meaning to the word BORING. Identifying the United Nations as Americas enemy is the only issue that will make Husseins voters change their minds. Romney has nothing to lose and everything to gain by hanging the United Nations around Husseins neck.
1. The Ryan-Biden debate will end in a draw.
2. The second debate between Romney and Hussein will end in a draw.
Both debates will end in dead heats for the same reasons:
1. Neither Biden nor Hussein can defend their foreign policy records; so they will paint them with the usual International community whitewash.
2. Romney and Ryan will wrap themselves in the flag to no avail.
If they were playing chess Hussein would be maneuvering for a draw because he knows he cannot win. American voters already know that Husseins Arab Spring handed Egypt and Libya to the Muslim Brotherhood. Americans voters know about the attacks on our embassies around the world. Americans know that the war against Islamic fundamentalists is ongoing regardless of Husseins denial and Osama bin Ladens demise.
Nothing either candidate will say about those issues is a mind-changer. Not one of Husseins failures will cost him a single vote on November 6. Romney wrapping himself in the flag will not gain him a single vote on November 6.
Ryan
If economic talk does not put viewers to sleep, or make them surf on outta there, Ryans biggest guns should open fire when the debate gets around to foreign policy because that is where Biden is most vulnerable. Everyone knows that Ryan is well-versed in economic issues. Thats not enough. He better be prepared on UN treaties as well as prepared to defend how Americans feel about broader foreign policy issues if he expects more than a draw.
When then-Senator Biden was chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee he tried his damnedest to ratify the LOST. On top of the LOST he supported every unratified United Nations treaty ever written. Ryan has only to ask Biden one question: Why do you want to give the United Nations the authority to tax the American people?
In the event Biden is dumb enough to answer, Ryan can show that the authority to tax is hidden in every UN treaty no matter what it is called. Even if Biden skirts around the issue with double-talk, his decades of vulnerability rubs off on Hussein more effectively than a bumper-sticker one-liner.
NOTE: Ryans staff should remind him that Tea Partiers defeated Richard Lugar in his nomination fight. Lugar was Bidens strongest Republican ally in trying to ratify the LOST.
Were I debating Biden, I would simply call him a goddamned traitor and show why. Ryan cannot say it my way, but he can use UN treaties to show exactly how Biden feels about this country. In case you have doubts these excerpts could have been written with Biden in mind:
However, no sooner had the 34th Republican senator signed a letter opposing LOST than the surrender of American sovereignty was put back on the table by foreign diplomats and their internationalist allies in the federal government.
XXXXX
The globalist ideologues behind these treaties are either ignorant of or hostile to the universal human experience that problems are best solved by the people and institutions closest to them. So assured are these masters of their mandate to direct the lives and wealth of other people that they see their routine failures to do so efficiently at the local, state and national level merely as reason to ascend to new heights of international command and control.
XXXXX
In exchange for gaining something it already has, then, the United States would, under LOST, surrender billions, possibly trillions, in royalty payments for oil and gas produced from our Outer Continental Shelf. At the same time, the treaty would expose our citizens to frivolous lawsuits in international courts.
LOST would trade in our Constitution for a vague 200-page compact drafted by foreign diplomats. It would trade in our Founding Fathers for the United Nations, and we the people for you the foreign secretaries weve never heard of and didnt elect.
XXXXX
In the end, for all their titles and credentials, the globalists are just liberal politicians with well-worn passports. It is not some new form of international harmony they seek but just larger institutions from which to impose their old, discredited agenda.
They see the U.S. Constitution as an obstacle to progress and so seek to supersede it by any means available to them. The debates about these treaties are not about the legalistic minutiae they contain but the sovereign citizenry they threaten.
U.N. treaties mean LOST U.S. sovereignty (Washington Times 07/25/2012)
By Sen. James M. Inhofe and Sen. Jim DeMint
Wednesday, July 25, 2012
.: United States Senator James Inhofe :: Press Room :.
Romney
Naturally, Romney is the main attraction. Hussein does not have Bidens long history of betraying this country that Romney can attack; nevertheless, Husseins vulnerability in foreign policy is no less than Bidens. Husseins brief time in the Senate, plus four years in the White House, is more than enough time to prove his love for the United Nations coupled with his bitter, near pathological, hatred for this country. The trick is get Hussein to defend his hatred so it becomes obvious.
American Communists, with a lot of help from the MSM, have been getting away with International community garbage since 1945. Romney will be lucky to get a draw if he plays Husseins foreign policy game. Romneys best weapon is Husseins need to guard his words. No matter how well Hussein prepares if Romney brings the foreign policy debate around to the United Nations, UN treaties, and sovereignty, I guarantee Hussein will crack. No American can justify the United Nations over sovereignty; least of all Hussein who is as shallow as the rhetoric and platitudes he has been spewing around since 2008.
Finally, presidential debates give new meaning to the word BORING. Identifying the United Nations as Americas enemy is the only issue that will make Husseins voters change their minds. Romney has nothing to lose and everything to gain by hanging the United Nations around Husseins neck.