"It ain't [America] no more, OK?"

[PubliusInfinitum]

I'm curious, how did the cop/guard get labeled an Obama supporter? I can't tell by looking at him myself.

Well that serves reason... because his looks have nothing to do with it.

First: there is no law which prevents the man's poster...

Second: the Cop was implementing his police powers to enforce a law which was not in effect.

Third: where one tries to enforce a law which does not exist, using authority which requires that the law tbe enforced, the only potential conclusion is that the officer was acting upon a SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION... thus his reasoning was based not upon an objective, readily definable instrument... ergo he was reacting to something that he felt was inappropriate... thus demonstrating his feelings that the BOY King could not be a Socialist, as the poster expressed, because HE doesn't feel that HE's A SOCIALIST, and supporting a socialist would actually, in point of fact, indicate otherwise.

It's not a complex calculation, just one well beyond the intellectual means of a Critical, Unfit, Neg-reppin' Thug; such as yourself.

The video simply demonstrates a rancid abuse of the power advanced on a public trust. The Cop seemed like a nice enough guy... but he should be stripped of his badge and shoudl forfeit any pension which a generation of Public service which he would have otherwise earned.

You're wrong in addition to being a whiner.

ROFLMNAO... Golly... I'm "WRONG"? Now that tends to indicate that there's some correction to be advanced...

Now let's examine the argument to see if we can spot such a correction...

All school and municipal property have laws that govern what may and may not be erected on publicly owned property.

Wow... well that seems so reasonable... and if I'd made a statement which implied that there were no rules regarding what can 'be erected on publicly owned property'... that would be a stunning point...

Why under such conditions Ravi's point would be lucid, cogent and otherwise well reasoned... It would be tantamount to a rhetorical MIRACLE!

Sadly.... There is nothing in my statement which so much as speaks to what can and can't be erected on publicly owned property... let alone an assertion that declares such to not be the case...

In the Video, the officer was REPEATELD AND SPECIFICALLY asked to cite the regulation which prohibits an individual from holding such a sign...

The officer made it incontestably clear that he was ignorant of ANY regulation, law, local ordinance, supervosiry prohibition or any OTHER such regulation which prohibited an individual from holding such a sign... the only point the officer made was that the sign had a picture on it when he foolishly implied that the picture made the sign illegal, thus providing him with the means to arrest the disply of same.

Now there is no ordinance which prohibits a person from holding a sign with a picture on it... as such a law would be demonstrably unconstitutional and would likely not stand scrutiny at the most local of courts... and certainly would not be sustained at the appelate level, where Judges are typically less inclined to subject their records to the admonition by higher judicial authority.

So we find that the Critical, Unfit, Neg-reppin' Thug was factually incorrect in her assertion; her argument being irrational, lacking lucidity, cogency, sound reasoning and logical validity... which would explain why the dumbass felt compelled to run and neg-rep the post for the 6th 150 point slam against my meager rep means in just under two weeks...

Which ironically, demonstrates the same fascist tendencies as the cop in the video...

Now my favorite part in the whole thing... is that THE DUMBASS WASN'T NEAR BRIGHT ENOUGH TO RECOGNIZE ANY OF IT!

 

[paperview]

I'm curious, how did the cop/guard get labeled an Obama supporter? I can't tell by looking at him myself.

Well that serves reason... because his looks have nothing to do with it.

First: there is no law which prevents the man's poster...

Second: the Cop was implementing his police powers to enforce a law which was not in effect.

Third: where one tries to enforce a law which does not exist, using authority which requires that the law tbe enforced, the only potential conclusion is that the officer was acting upon a SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION... thus his reasoning was based not upon an objective, readily definable instrument... ergo he was reacting to something that he felt was inappropriate... thus demonstrating his feelings that the BOY King could not be a Socialist, as the poster expressed, because HE doesn't feel that HE's A SOCIALIST, and supporting a socialist would actually, in point of fact, indicate otherwise.

It's not a complex calculation, just one well beyond the intellectual means of a Critical, Unfit, Neg-reppin' Thug; such as yourself.

The video simply demonstrates a rancid abuse of the power advanced on a public trust. The Cop seemed like a nice enough guy... but he should be stripped of his badge and shoudl forfeit any pension which a generation of Public service which he would have otherwise earned.

You're wrong in addition to being a whiner. All school and municipal property have laws that govern what may and may not be erected on publicly owned property.

Yup. In addition - The security guard may very have been a jerk, but we don't know one thing:
what happened before the camera went on.

There may have been 10 minutes of the cop talking nicely to the guy....there may have been a whole lot that went on
- we don't know.

We got the film at the point the guy was pissed and the opening bit of the youtoobie was - what sounded like end-of the line "let's get your identification -- name & badge number on film...you dick.

 

[Ravi]

Well that serves reason... because his looks have nothing to do with it.

First: there is no law which prevents the man's poster...

Second: the Cop was implementing his police powers to enforce a law which was not in effect.

Third: where one tries to enforce a law which does not exist, using authority which requires that the law tbe enforced, the only potential conclusion is that the officer was acting upon a SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION... thus his reasoning was based not upon an objective, readily definable instrument... ergo he was reacting to something that he felt was inappropriate... thus demonstrating his feelings that the BOY King could not be a Socialist, as the poster expressed, because HE doesn't feel that HE's A SOCIALIST, and supporting a socialist would actually, in point of fact, indicate otherwise.

It's not a complex calculation, just one well beyond the intellectual means of a Critical, Unfit, Neg-reppin' Thug; such as yourself.

The video simply demonstrates a rancid abuse of the power advanced on a public trust. The Cop seemed like a nice enough guy... but he should be stripped of his badge and shoudl forfeit any pension which a generation of Public service which he would have otherwise earned.

You're wrong in addition to being a whiner. All school and municipal property have laws that govern what may and may not be erected on publicly owned property.

Yup. In addition - The security guard may very have been a jerk, but we don't know one thing:
what happened before the camera went on.

There may have been 10 minutes of the cop talking nicely to the guy....there may have been a whole lot that went on
- we don't know.

We got the film at the point the guy was pissed and the opening bit of the youtoobie was - what sounded like end-of the line "let's get your identification -- name & badge number on film...you dick.

I don't think it matters what went on before. The cop didn't arrest the asshole, and he probably could have made a case for himself if he did, because the asshole was abusive...oh, wait, abuse is only an arrestable offense if you're a liberal.

I confess, it all confuses me.

Still, there actually are laws about what you can and cannot post on school property. No big surprise that "conservatives" don't care about the law.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

Well that serves reason... because his looks have nothing to do with it.

First: there is no law which prevents the man's poster...

Second: the Cop was implementing his police powers to enforce a law which was not in effect.

Third: where one tries to enforce a law which does not exist, using authority which requires that the law tbe enforced, the only potential conclusion is that the officer was acting upon a SUBJECTIVE INTERPRETATION... thus his reasoning was based not upon an objective, readily definable instrument... ergo he was reacting to something that he felt was inappropriate... thus demonstrating his feelings that the BOY King could not be a Socialist, as the poster expressed, because HE doesn't feel that HE's A SOCIALIST, and supporting a socialist would actually, in point of fact, indicate otherwise.

It's not a complex calculation, just one well beyond the intellectual means of a Critical, Unfit, Neg-reppin' Thug; such as yourself.

The video simply demonstrates a rancid abuse of the power advanced on a public trust. The Cop seemed like a nice enough guy... but he should be stripped of his badge and shoudl forfeit any pension which a generation of Public service which he would have otherwise earned.

You're wrong in addition to being a whiner. All school and municipal property have laws that govern what may and may not be erected on publicly owned property.

Yup. In addition - The security guard may very have been a jerk, but we don't know one thing:
what happened before the camera went on.

There may have been 10 minutes of the cop talking nicely to the guy....there may have been a whole lot that went on
- we don't know.

We got the film at the point the guy was pissed and the opening bit of the youtoobie was - what sounded like end-of the line "let's get your identification -- name & badge number on film...you dick.

The Cop was 'talking nicely...' He was talking nicely, as most "progressives" do when they're abusing the public trust to invoke their 'feelings' outside of any constitutional power to do so.

We know that there was a polical rally... we know that there was no law which the cop was enforcing and we know this because the Cop repeatedly stated that he didn't have to have a law to enforce... because he WAS the law and whatever he said the law was... WAS THE LAW.

Had that been my sign, he'd have had to have arrested me, charged me and faced the music for his abuse of power. On the bright side, he'd be down 20 lbs at the end of the deposition, for which he would have been subpoenaed; wherein he would have been questioned in depth with regard to his ideology; his party affiliation and so on... as well as his knowledge of public policy with regard to local ordinances and the first amendment of the US Constitution, SCOTUS decisions on same and so on and most importantly, given his previously statements, what he meant by "it ain't (America) no mo'..."

I doubt he'd have enjoyed it much... and the trial even less.

 

[PubliusInfinitum]

You're wrong in addition to being a whiner. All school and municipal property have laws that govern what may and may not be erected on publicly owned property.

Yup. In addition - The security guard may very have been a jerk, but we don't know one thing:
what happened before the camera went on.

There may have been 10 minutes of the cop talking nicely to the guy....there may have been a whole lot that went on
- we don't know.

We got the film at the point the guy was pissed and the opening bit of the youtoobie was - what sounded like end-of the line "let's get your identification -- name & badge number on film...you dick.

I don't think it matters what went on before. The cop didn't arrest the asshole, and he probably could have made a case for himself if he did, because the asshole was abusive...oh, wait, abuse is only an arrestable offense if you're a liberal.

I confess, it all confuses me.

Still, there actually are laws about what you can and cannot post on school property. No big surprise that "conservatives" don't care about the law.

AGAIN! This member comes to assert that she knows of 'laws at the school about what you can and cannot post on school property'... Now this implies that the Critical, Unfit, Neg-reppin Thug is in possession of information which ESTABLISH THE CERTAINTY THAT THIS COP WAS WITHIN HIS LEGAL AUTHORITY TO USE HIS POLICE POWER TO FORCE A CITIZEN TO SILENCE HIS POLITICAL SPEECH!

Nothing particularly difficult here... we'll simply ask Ravi to cite the specific law, OF which she has asserted that SHE IS IN FULL KNOWLEDGE, which the Police Officer was enforcing... and which the police officer REPEATEDLY REFUSED TO CITE during the incident; and such follows in unabiguous terms in a direct challenge to Ravi:

RAVI, YOU'VE IMPLIED THAT YOU'RE IN POSSESSION OF THIS SCHOOL HAVING RULES WHICH PROHIBITED THIS MAN FROM CARRYING HIS SIGN ILLUSTRATING THE SOCIALIST ROOTS OF OBAMA-CARE... CITE THE SPECIFIC RULES TO WHICH YOU'RE ALLUDING OR CONCEDE BY DEFAULT THAT YOUR ASSERTION AND THE IMPLICATION ON WHICH IT REST IS BASELESS DRIVEL, UTTER DECEIT AND THAT SUCH IS FOUNDED IN LITTLE MORE THAN YOUR RAW, ANTI-AMERICAN IDIOCY.

Now friends, when Ravi fails to respond to this unambiguous, directly posed challenge; or then she responds with yet another 150pt neg-rep or some other means of obfuscation... she will have DEMONSTRATED, YET AGAIN... her intellectual deficiancy, which is common to irrational females... such as herself and her Comrades despite their given gender.

 

[MaggieMae]

The Cop was 'talking nicely...' He was talking nicely, as most "progressives" do when they're abusing the public trust to invoke their 'feelings' outside of any constitutional power to do so.

Why would he (or anyone for that matter) try to be NICE to a bunch of wild-eyed freakos who don't have pushed the envelope too far?

This is an excellent analysis of what has been going on, complete with the video of the screaming maniacs at the New Jersey town hall where the woman in a WHEELCHAIR was shouted down. Take note that it is from a CONSERVATIVE website (probably had to put a token centrist there just to keep it alive).


Video: Wheelchair-bound woman shouted down at Frank Pallone New Jersey Town Hall | Mofo Politics | Hoping Obama Fails

As Joe Scarborough, another CENTRIST Republican, said this morning: "The asinine comparisons to Chairman Mao might get [you] ratings, but you're just screwing your political party."

If Republicans have their eye on 2010 or 2012, people will begin reviewing this garbage spewing from their ignorant mouths and wondering why we should put THOSE TYPES in any kind of power.

 

[DiveCon]

just watched the video and some of it was disgusting, but some of it was just plain stupidi hope the video wasnt edited so it didnt show anyone good there

 

[MaggieMae]

just watched the video and some of it was disgusting, but some of it was just plain stupidi hope the video wasnt edited so it didnt show anyone good there

Thank you. (I think.) The video is everywhere.

 

[DiveCon]

just watched the video and some of it was disgusting, but some of it was just plain stupidi hope the video wasnt edited so it didnt show anyone good there

Thank you. (I think.) The video is everywhere.

i was refering to the guy that actually MADE the video
that he didnt leave out the people that werent behaving poorly

 

[Ravi]

You're wrong in addition to being a whiner. All school and municipal property have laws that govern what may and may not be erected on publicly owned property.

Yup. In addition - The security guard may very have been a jerk, but we don't know one thing:
what happened before the camera went on.

There may have been 10 minutes of the cop talking nicely to the guy....there may have been a whole lot that went on
- we don't know.

We got the film at the point the guy was pissed and the opening bit of the youtoobie was - what sounded like end-of the line "let's get your identification -- name & badge number on film...you dick.

The Cop was 'talking nicely...' He was talking nicely, as most "progressives" do when they're abusing the public trust to invoke their 'feelings' outside of any constitutional power to do so.

We know that there was a polical rally... we know that there was no law which the cop was enforcing and we know this because the Cop repeatedly stated that he didn't have to have a law to enforce... because he WAS the law and whatever he said the law was... WAS THE LAW.

Had that been my sign, he'd have had to have arrested me, charged me and faced the music for his abuse of power. On the bright side, he'd be down 20 lbs at the end of the deposition, for which he would have been subpoenaed; wherein he would have been questioned in depth with regard to his ideology; his party affiliation and so on... as well as his knowledge of public policy with regard to local ordinances and the first amendment of the US Constitution, SCOTUS decisions on same and so on and most importantly, given his previously statements, what he meant by "it ain't (America) no mo'..."

I doubt he'd have enjoyed it much... and the trial even less.

How do you abuse your power if you don't arrest someone?

No one here thinks you are brave enough to resist arrest, Pubic.

I like how you admit that people should take loyalty oaths, though.
For someone that rails against communists you are actually the biggest commie here. Let me guess, Joe McCarthy has a shrine in your home that you get off to.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

This is why you NEVER want the police to be the only armed citizens.

yeah...cause pulling a gun on a cop will get you sooooo far.

it will get you DEAD

Yeah, but then your family can sue a get a gazillion $$!!!! See? There's a silver lining to everything.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

SO yeah...this thread is 7 years old.

 

[BlackAsCoal]

YouTube - Officer Does Not Like anti-Obama Poster: "It ain't [America] no more, OK?"

Free speech continues to take a beating.

Police officers abusing citizens and over-stepping their authority?

Yep, this is the same America it has always been.

 

[paperview]

I wonder if Secret Service would get involved if things like this are found
(on his youtube page):

"FuckObamasMama (2 weeks ago)
I would never cruicify Jesus Christ,
But i'd feel inclined to nail the SOB
in the white house to the bottom of a river kayak,
until the bottom is clean."

Although I don't share those views now the comment said "I'd" not "I will". "I will" would imply an an impending danger but that's not the case.Just an opinion at the time and not meant to be taken the way you describe.Sorry about that.

What the fuck?

Bumping a seven year old thread and then spamming?

Are you a bot?

 

[Mac1958]

YouTube - Officer Does Not Like anti-Obama Poster: "It ain't [America] no more, OK?"

Free speech continues to take a beating.

Well, at least the officer was being honest.

It ain't. Sadly.
.