As a matter of protocol, when you propose to make statements like "wrong on all counts'---this necessarily entails a bit more teeth than personal speculation---which is all you offer...do you understand this? Are you familair with the content of scope of PNAC? The "goal" in Iraq was conquest and control---which is exaclty what took place...we now hold all the cards, having set up a reliable proxy-government, and replaced troops with military contractors. The same 'goal' applies to Iran...U.S./Israeli hegemony. Israel will not launch a strike on Iran without the assurred backing of the U.S. military...otherwise it would have already happened
Your post is unresponsive. The subject under discussion was what the likely consequences of an Israeli strike against Iran's nuclear program might be with respect to Lebanon and Gaza, not your fantasies about PNAC. You speculation that Israel will not strike Iran's nuclear program without US backing because it has not already done it makes no sense at all. Israel has never had US backing in any of its military operations.
Here you have struck the motherload of reckless ignorance: "Israel has never had U.S. backing in any of its military operations"??? Whom do you imagine supplies the high-tech toys you wondrous idiot??? Who foots the bill??? who furnishes U.S. military advisors??? You stupidity is breathataking...
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Everybody's ignorance is reckless and their stupidity takes your breath away. What a flamer.
Now while you are feeling all good about yourself, Princess, perhaps you would reach into your bag of tricks and post something in support of your claim that US military advisors are operating in Israel.