Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I guess the troll is back to his spamming of the same five bullshit irrelvant documents.
They called it the European name for the region aka Palestine, because for centuries before that, it was ruled by the Ottoman Turks who called it Southern Syria. Then when the Ottoman Empire fell after WWI, the British took over and called it the Palestine Mandate, which made all these Arabs, Jews, and Christians, British subjects. Doesn't make Palestine a country, nor does it create these fictional Palestinian people that never existed before that.
But let's not let that keep you posting this bullshit big lie another 5000 times, and derail the thread for the 10,00th time.
Now back to the topic, do go ahead and tell us, do Paleshitian savages have "rule of law"? Here's Palestinian animals' idea of rule of law, LOL:
The Palestine Mandate
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
Member states of the League of Nations
. Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, the British Empire, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, El Salvador, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Irish Free State, Ethiopia, Italy, Liberia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Persia/Iran, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Siam, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Union of South Africa, Uruguay, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Luxembourg, Albania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Turkey, Iraq, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Afghanistan, British Raj, Syria and Ecuador.
.
Cunty just proved that the allied powers decided to allow Jews to become British subject citizens of the Palestine Mandate and eventually make it their homeland. Funny how they keep putting their hoofs in the mouths.
Yep, he is impaired.
If he doesn't come here to defend the Zionists Bibi won't let him partake in their blow job fests.
He has had this Semen Addiction for too long......The Likuds are just passing him around from Cock to Cock...shame really,he was once a kind mothers son..
You two really need to hook up and taste each other corks. This isn't the gay forum, FYI, so keep your sexual fantasies in check.
There ya go with your homosexual fantasies again. What happened, your donkey broke up with you?You two really need to hook up and taste each other corks. This isn't the gay forum, FYI, so keep your sexual fantasies in check.He has had this Semen Addiction for too long......The Likuds are just passing him around from Cock to Cock...shame really,he was once a kind mothers son..Cunty just proved that the allied powers decided to allow Jews to become British subject citizens of the Palestine Mandate and eventually make it their homeland. Funny how they keep putting their hoofs in the mouths.The Palestine Mandate
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
Member states of the League of Nations
. Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, the British Empire, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, El Salvador, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Irish Free State, Ethiopia, Italy, Liberia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Persia/Iran, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Siam, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Union of South Africa, Uruguay, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Luxembourg, Albania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Turkey, Iraq, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Afghanistan, British Raj, Syria and Ecuador.
.
Yep, he is impaired.
If he doesn't come here to defend the Zionists Bibi won't let him partake in their blow job fests.
What the fcuk is a cork?????do you mean Cock,and Cork was a slip of the finger ??? Look if you are continually smothered IN Likud semen Roudy<No wonder you are mistyping.....any one would think you are trying to get us into a threesome.......There are Laws about YOUR TYPE OF BEHAVIOUR...steve...Now behave Rouds please
I guess the troll is back to his spamming of the same five bullshit irrelvant documents.What were the British thinking, they called the Muslims and Christians inhabitants of Palestine? Do you have any idea?
"PALESTINE.The Colonial Office to the Palestine Arab Delegation.
CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.
Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:
DOWNING STREET,
1st March, 1922.
"2. I am to point out in the first place that, while your Delegation is recognised by Mr. Churchill as representing a large section of the Moslem and Christian inhabitants of Palestine..."
UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)
They called it the European name for the region aka Palestine, because for centuries before that, it was ruled by the Ottoman Turks who called it Southern Syria. Then when the Ottoman Empire fell after WWI, the British took over and called it the Palestine Mandate, which made all these Arabs, Jews, and Christians, British subjects. Doesn't make Palestine a country, nor does it create these fictional Palestinian people that never existed before that.
But let's not let that keep you posting this bullshit big lie another 5000 times, and derail the thread for the 10,00th time.
Now back to the topic, do go ahead and tell us, do Paleshitian savages have "rule of law"? Here's Palestinian animals' idea of rule of law, LOL:
The Palestine Mandate
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
Member states of the League of Nations
. Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, the British Empire, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, El Salvador, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Irish Free State, Ethiopia, Italy, Liberia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Persia/Iran, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Siam, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Union of South Africa, Uruguay, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Luxembourg, Albania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Turkey, Iraq, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Afghanistan, British Raj, Syria and Ecuador.
.
Cunty just proved that the allied powers decided to allow Jews to become British subject citizens of the Palestine Mandate and eventually make it their homeland. Funny how they keep putting their hoofs in the mouths.
Yep, he is impaired.
If he doesn't come here to defend the Zionists Bibi won't let him partake in their blow job fests.
He has had this Semen Addiction for too long......The Likuds are just passing him around from Cock to Cock...shame really,he was once a kind mothers son..
I guess the troll is back to his spamming of the same five bullshit irrelvant documents.What were the British thinking, they called the Muslims and Christians inhabitants of Palestine? Do you have any idea?
"PALESTINE.The Colonial Office to the Palestine Arab Delegation.
CORRESPONDENCE
WITH THE
PALESTINE ARAB DELEGATION
AND THE
ZIONIST ORGANISATION.
Presented to Parliament by Command of His Majesty.
JUNE, 1922.
LONDON:
DOWNING STREET,
1st March, 1922.
"2. I am to point out in the first place that, while your Delegation is recognised by Mr. Churchill as representing a large section of the Moslem and Christian inhabitants of Palestine..."
UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)
They called it the European name for the region aka Palestine, because for centuries before that, it was ruled by the Ottoman Turks who called it Southern Syria. Then when the Ottoman Empire fell after WWI, the British took over and called it the Palestine Mandate, which made all these Arabs, Jews, and Christians, British subjects. Doesn't make Palestine a country, nor does it create these fictional Palestinian people that never existed before that.
But let's not let that keep you posting this bullshit big lie another 5000 times, and derail the thread for the 10,00th time.
Now back to the topic, do go ahead and tell us, do Paleshitian savages have "rule of law"? Here's Palestinian animals' idea of rule of law, LOL:
The Palestine Mandate
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
Member states of the League of Nations
. Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, the British Empire, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, El Salvador, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Irish Free State, Ethiopia, Italy, Liberia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Persia/Iran, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Siam, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Union of South Africa, Uruguay, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Luxembourg, Albania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Turkey, Iraq, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Afghanistan, British Raj, Syria and Ecuador.
.
Cunty just proved that the allied powers decided to allow Jews to become British subject citizens of the Palestine Mandate and eventually make it their homeland. Funny how they keep putting their hoofs in the mouths.
Listen stupid fuck
if you identify your vernacular I can have the document translated.
The UK was given SUPERVISORY POWERS over Palestine - Palestine did not become a British Territory.
Unfortunately Menachem Begin and the Irgun Zionist gang began terrorizing the Palestinians and the UK
Then in 1949 Harry S Truman compounded the situation by ARBITRARILY giving Palestine to the Zionists.
An individual who approves such injustice has to be related to Charles Manson.
.
.
Cunty failed to mention that at that time being a Palestinian meant you were issued a British passport and the area wasentirely ruled by the British. That's his idea of "supervisory" LOL.
Cunty also failed to mention that the Arabs led by the Nazi mufti were the ones who decided to commit genocide on the Jews in their own holy land, and shortly after the first few attacks, the Jews who had their backs to the wall and had nowhere else to go, decided to take up arms and defend themselves against the animals. A civil war ensued, the Arabs lost, and the rest is history.
Like it or not the Arabs never ruled or controled the land, they really had no say in this, other than being recent invaders and squatters who were trying to take advantage of a collapsed Ottoman Empire by taking all the lands they could, and as usual they resorted to terrorism and force when things didn't go their way. It's still happening today, take a look around the globe and see the fruits of this imperialistic terroristic cult called Islam
I guess the troll is back to his spamming of the same five bullshit irrelvant documents.
They called it the European name for the region aka Palestine, because for centuries before that, it was ruled by the Ottoman Turks who called it Southern Syria. Then when the Ottoman Empire fell after WWI, the British took over and called it the Palestine Mandate, which made all these Arabs, Jews, and Christians, British subjects. Doesn't make Palestine a country, nor does it create these fictional Palestinian people that never existed before that.
But let's not let that keep you posting this bullshit big lie another 5000 times, and derail the thread for the 10,00th time.
Now back to the topic, do go ahead and tell us, do Paleshitian savages have "rule of law"? Here's Palestinian animals' idea of rule of law, LOL:
The Palestine Mandate
The Council of the League of Nations:
Whereas the Principal Allied Powers have agreed, for the purpose of giving effect to the provisions of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, to entrust to a Mandatory selected by the said Powers the administration of the territory of Palestine, which formerly belonged to the Turkish Empire, within such boundaries as may be fixed by them; and
ART. 7.
The Administration of Palestine shall be responsible for enacting a nationality law. There shall be included in this law provisions framed so as to facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews who take up their permanent residence in Palestine.
Member states of the League of Nations
. Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Bolivia, the British Empire, Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Cuba, Czechoslovakia, Denmark, El Salvador, France, Greece, Guatemala, Haiti, Honduras, India, Irish Free State, Ethiopia, Italy, Liberia, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Paraguay, Persia/Iran, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Siam, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the Union of South Africa, Uruguay, Yugoslavia, Venezuela, Austria, Bulgaria, Finland, Luxembourg, Albania, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Ireland, the Dominican Republic, Mexico, Turkey, Iraq, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Afghanistan, British Raj, Syria and Ecuador.
.
Cunty just proved that the allied powers decided to allow Jews to become British subject citizens of the Palestine Mandate and eventually make it their homeland. Funny how they keep putting their hoofs in the mouths.
Yep, he is impaired.
If he doesn't come here to defend the Zionists Bibi won't let him partake in their blow job fests.
He has had this Semen Addiction for too long......The Likuds are just passing him around from Cock to Cock...shame really,he was once a kind mothers son..
And of course , studies show that semen addiction clouds the judgment.
.
Despite stern warnings from the U.N. and even the U.S., Israel continues its steady march toward becoming an apartheid state that relies on anti-Arab racism to justify its behavior, as Lawrence Davidson describes.
By Lawrence Davidson
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threw a temper tantrum on Dec. 24 after the U.S. failed to veto United Nations Security Council Resolution 2234 condemning Zionist settlements on Palestinian territory.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on March 3, 2015, in opposition to President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran. (Screen shot from CNN broadcast)
Netanyahu called the resolution “shameful.” He went so far as to tell the foreign secretary of New Zealand, one of the countries that brought the resolution forward for a vote, that this action was the equivalent of “an act of war.” He then started recalling Israeli ambassadors from the Security Council states that backed the resolution. Finally, Netanyahu said Israel would “not abide by it [the resolution].” All in all it was quite a performance.
In order to put the prime minister’s outrage in context, let’s look at what, in part, the resolution actually says. It “reaffirms the obligation of Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War … and recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice, condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions…”
In other words, UNSC Resolution 2234 told the Israeli government that it is obliged to follow the rule of law – in this case international law. Mr. Netanyahu’s response was to repudiate that law. Thus, the Israeli prime minister ran from the law – something outlaws do.
This is nothing new. Israel has been acting in a criminal fashion in (among other areas) the West Bank of Palestine for the past 50 years – and doing so with impunity. “Impunity” is the key word here. The prime minister’s response was, in part, to the unexpected refusal of the United States to continue its half-century practice of protecting the Zionist state from any consequences for its illegal behavior.
Israel’s Above-the-Law Behavior – Consortiumnews
They refuse to recognize The very UN that brought israel into being
Zionist Israel is a scofflaw state.
arent you jewish racist boi? Why yes, yes you are. Proves OP's pointGood, the Jews are the better people
Don't know if he is Jewish, but he certainly is a racist p.o.s.
Name one country that has not at one time or another violated international law or continues to do so. Unfortunately it appears that Lawrence has joined the "Israel is an Criminal Apartheid Nation" propaganda crowd hence surrendering any credibility concerning having an unbiased view. Indeed an unfortunate position for any social scientist, expected to be unbiasedly neutral, to find themselves in.Despite stern warnings from the U.N. and even the U.S., Israel continues its steady march toward becoming an apartheid state that relies on anti-Arab racism to justify its behavior, as Lawrence Davidson describes.
By Lawrence Davidson
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threw a temper tantrum on Dec. 24 after the U.S. failed to veto United Nations Security Council Resolution 2234 condemning Zionist settlements on Palestinian territory.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on March 3, 2015, in opposition to President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran. (Screen shot from CNN broadcast)
Netanyahu called the resolution “shameful.” He went so far as to tell the foreign secretary of New Zealand, one of the countries that brought the resolution forward for a vote, that this action was the equivalent of “an act of war.” He then started recalling Israeli ambassadors from the Security Council states that backed the resolution. Finally, Netanyahu said Israel would “not abide by it [the resolution].” All in all it was quite a performance.
In order to put the prime minister’s outrage in context, let’s look at what, in part, the resolution actually says. It “reaffirms the obligation of Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War … and recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice, condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions…”
In other words, UNSC Resolution 2234 told the Israeli government that it is obliged to follow the rule of law – in this case international law. Mr. Netanyahu’s response was to repudiate that law. Thus, the Israeli prime minister ran from the law – something outlaws do.
This is nothing new. Israel has been acting in a criminal fashion in (among other areas) the West Bank of Palestine for the past 50 years – and doing so with impunity. “Impunity” is the key word here. The prime minister’s response was, in part, to the unexpected refusal of the United States to continue its half-century practice of protecting the Zionist state from any consequences for its illegal behavior.
Israel’s Above-the-Law Behavior – Consortiumnews
They refuse to recognize The very UN that brought israel into being
Does that mean Israel is completely blameless? Of course not, they're a nation doing what they think is best for their own protection, like all nations/peoples do, sometimes they get it right sometimes they don't and as always right and wrong can be subjective depending on the viewer.
The Nazis did what they thought was best for their own protection.
The white South Africans did what they thought was best for their own protection.
How did I know that was coming......... You're part of the "Israel is an Criminal Apartheid Nation" crowd, aren't ya......... You gonna compare the rest of the world also? Given you apparent criteria you should.Name one country that has not at one time or another violated international law or continues to do so. Unfortunately it appears that Lawrence has joined the "Israel is an Criminal Apartheid Nation" propaganda crowd hence surrendering any credibility concerning having an unbiased view. Indeed an unfortunate position for any social scientist, expected to be unbiasedly neutral, to find themselves in.Despite stern warnings from the U.N. and even the U.S., Israel continues its steady march toward becoming an apartheid state that relies on anti-Arab racism to justify its behavior, as Lawrence Davidson describes.
By Lawrence Davidson
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threw a temper tantrum on Dec. 24 after the U.S. failed to veto United Nations Security Council Resolution 2234 condemning Zionist settlements on Palestinian territory.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on March 3, 2015, in opposition to President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran. (Screen shot from CNN broadcast)
Netanyahu called the resolution “shameful.” He went so far as to tell the foreign secretary of New Zealand, one of the countries that brought the resolution forward for a vote, that this action was the equivalent of “an act of war.” He then started recalling Israeli ambassadors from the Security Council states that backed the resolution. Finally, Netanyahu said Israel would “not abide by it [the resolution].” All in all it was quite a performance.
In order to put the prime minister’s outrage in context, let’s look at what, in part, the resolution actually says. It “reaffirms the obligation of Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War … and recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice, condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions…”
In other words, UNSC Resolution 2234 told the Israeli government that it is obliged to follow the rule of law – in this case international law. Mr. Netanyahu’s response was to repudiate that law. Thus, the Israeli prime minister ran from the law – something outlaws do.
This is nothing new. Israel has been acting in a criminal fashion in (among other areas) the West Bank of Palestine for the past 50 years – and doing so with impunity. “Impunity” is the key word here. The prime minister’s response was, in part, to the unexpected refusal of the United States to continue its half-century practice of protecting the Zionist state from any consequences for its illegal behavior.
Israel’s Above-the-Law Behavior – Consortiumnews
They refuse to recognize The very UN that brought israel into being
Does that mean Israel is completely blameless? Of course not, they're a nation doing what they think is best for their own protection, like all nations/peoples do, sometimes they get it right sometimes they don't and as always right and wrong can be subjective depending on the viewer.
The Nazis did what they thought was best for their own protection.
The white South Africans did what they thought was best for their own protection.
How many countries rule over millions of people living in sectioned parts of territory under the country's complete control on the basis of religious/ethnic affiliation? Not since the South African Bantustans have we seen anything on the scale of what the Israelis are doing.
A link to what? You are aware that Israel rules over the West Bank controlling all its borders and air space as well as maintaining internal control with the IDF. You must also be aware that the borders, territorial sea and air space of Gaza is controlled by Israel. You need link for that.
he said he was last year guy. He's the leading racist on the board (look at the threads he dumps in Current Events) and he's jewish by his own admissionI don't think that Tank is Jewish.
The Brutal Invading European Zionists (BieZ) had always envisioned the colonization and oppression of the indigenous Muslims and Christians of Palestine. Israelis Jews today dominate non-Jews through force of arms either through control of borders, air space and territorial sea, or through a military presence.
There was and is systematic oppression of the non-Jews by the Zionists from the start. The Zionist's insistence on establishing minority rule through gerrymandering, was at the core of the Partition Plan. The non-Jews, when the Bedouin population were considered, outnumbered the Zionists at the time of partition.
Insofar as the transfer of population is concerned, you are wrong again, as usual.
The ICJ's Wall decision states:
Article 49(6) of the Fourth Hague Convention “prohibits not only deportations and forced transfers of population such as those carried out during the Second World War, but also any measures taken by an occupying power to organize or encourage transfers of parts of its own population into the occupied territory”.
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1677.pdf
The Brutal Invading European Zionists (BieZ) had always envisioned the colonization and oppression of the indigenous Muslims and Christians of Palestine. Israelis Jews today dominate non-Jews through force of arms either through control of borders, air space and territorial sea, or through a military presence.
There was and is systematic oppression of the non-Jews by the Zionists from the start. The Zionist's insistence on establishing minority rule through gerrymandering, was at the core of the Partition Plan. The non-Jews, when the Bedouin population were considered, outnumbered the Zionists at the time of partition.
Insofar as the transfer of population is concerned, you are wrong again, as usual.
The ICJ's Wall decision states:
Article 49(6) of the Fourth Hague Convention “prohibits not only deportations and forced transfers of population such as those carried out during the Second World War, but also any measures taken by an occupying power to organize or encourage transfers of parts of its own population into the occupied territory”.
http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/131/1677.pdf
Indeed, like Israel has its fat ass parked in Palestine.There is no question that there are some territorial disputes between the Arab Palestinians and Israelis.
And Eloy Let us not forget The Zionists are the Jewish MAFIAZionist Israel is a scofflaw state.
PIG you mean MonteDon't know if he is Jewish, but he certainly is a racist p.o.s.
NEVER AGAIN BUT THE ZIONIST FILTH ARE WORSE THAN NEVER AGAINDespite stern warnings from the U.N. and even the U.S., Israel continues its steady march toward becoming an apartheid state that relies on anti-Arab racism to justify its behavior, as Lawrence Davidson describes.
By Lawrence Davidson
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threw a temper tantrum on Dec. 24 after the U.S. failed to veto United Nations Security Council Resolution 2234 condemning Zionist settlements on Palestinian territory.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on March 3, 2015, in opposition to President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran. (Screen shot from CNN broadcast)
Netanyahu called the resolution “shameful.” He went so far as to tell the foreign secretary of New Zealand, one of the countries that brought the resolution forward for a vote, that this action was the equivalent of “an act of war.” He then started recalling Israeli ambassadors from the Security Council states that backed the resolution. Finally, Netanyahu said Israel would “not abide by it [the resolution].” All in all it was quite a performance.
In order to put the prime minister’s outrage in context, let’s look at what, in part, the resolution actually says. It “reaffirms the obligation of Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War … and recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice, condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions…”
In other words, UNSC Resolution 2234 told the Israeli government that it is obliged to follow the rule of law – in this case international law. Mr. Netanyahu’s response was to repudiate that law. Thus, the Israeli prime minister ran from the law – something outlaws do.
This is nothing new. Israel has been acting in a criminal fashion in (among other areas) the West Bank of Palestine for the past 50 years – and doing so with impunity. “Impunity” is the key word here. The prime minister’s response was, in part, to the unexpected refusal of the United States to continue its half-century practice of protecting the Zionist state from any consequences for its illegal behavior.
Israel’s Above-the-Law Behavior – Consortiumnews
They refuse to recognize The very UN that brought israel into being
condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967,
If there was no Palestinian territory before 1967, how could Israel occupy any Palestinian territory after 1967?
Ask the International Court of Justice.
toastedparrot is a Meir Kahane disciple. Don't waste your time.
.
Kahane Chai, y'all!
Zionist Patriot you mean DickheadDespite stern warnings from the U.N. and even the U.S., Israel continues its steady march toward becoming an apartheid state that relies on anti-Arab racism to justify its behavior, as Lawrence Davidson describes.
By Lawrence Davidson
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu threw a temper tantrum on Dec. 24 after the U.S. failed to veto United Nations Security Council Resolution 2234 condemning Zionist settlements on Palestinian territory.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaking to a joint session of the U.S. Congress on March 3, 2015, in opposition to President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with Iran. (Screen shot from CNN broadcast)
Netanyahu called the resolution “shameful.” He went so far as to tell the foreign secretary of New Zealand, one of the countries that brought the resolution forward for a vote, that this action was the equivalent of “an act of war.” He then started recalling Israeli ambassadors from the Security Council states that backed the resolution. Finally, Netanyahu said Israel would “not abide by it [the resolution].” All in all it was quite a performance.
In order to put the prime minister’s outrage in context, let’s look at what, in part, the resolution actually says. It “reaffirms the obligation of Israel, the occupying Power, to abide scrupulously by its legal obligations and responsibilities under the Fourth Geneva Convention relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War … and recalling the advisory opinion rendered on 9 July 2004 by the International Court of Justice, condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, including, inter alia, the construction and expansion of settlements, transfer of Israeli settlers, confiscation of land, demolition of homes and displacement of Palestinian civilians, in violation of international humanitarian law and relevant resolutions…”
In other words, UNSC Resolution 2234 told the Israeli government that it is obliged to follow the rule of law – in this case international law. Mr. Netanyahu’s response was to repudiate that law. Thus, the Israeli prime minister ran from the law – something outlaws do.
This is nothing new. Israel has been acting in a criminal fashion in (among other areas) the West Bank of Palestine for the past 50 years – and doing so with impunity. “Impunity” is the key word here. The prime minister’s response was, in part, to the unexpected refusal of the United States to continue its half-century practice of protecting the Zionist state from any consequences for its illegal behavior.
Israel’s Above-the-Law Behavior – Consortiumnews
They refuse to recognize The very UN that brought israel into being
condemning all measures aimed at altering the demographic composition, character and status of the Palestinian Territory occupied since 1967,
If there was no Palestinian territory before 1967, how could Israel occupy any Palestinian territory after 1967?
Ask the International Court of Justice.
toastedparrot is a Meir Kahane disciple. Don't waste your time.
.
There, there, don't cry.
Liar...or more than one person posting under one user name.Sociopath or overcompensated inferiority complex?Well Indie as you know I am a humble man and always try to be on the same level as my inferiors,LOL....your post actually was pretty funny 10/10 stevenThen why do you go to such lengths to hide your intelligence?YOU GUYS ARE ON A HIDING TO NOTHING WITH ME....I'm just too bright for YOUNo,I leave that sort of Bullshit to you Synthetic Zionists of which you are Masters ATWikipedia? did you "contribute to the article" before you linked it?
Those who would be Palestinians was already decided by international law and was reiterated by the Treaty of Lausanne.Indeed, like Israel has its fat ass parked in Palestine.There is no question that there are some territorial disputes between the Arab Palestinians and Israelis.
Dont you mean the arab muslim illegal immigrants with no legal claim to the land has parked its ass in Israel, then whinges when they get kicked out
