Israelis infuriated by cruelty: Terror attack filmed by Arabs who stood by carelessly

What determines who owns is who paid for it from the previous owner.

Achmed owns a parcel of land. All good. Issac buys it from Achmed then Issac owns it. Why is this so hard for the pallies to understand?

Really? I think I understand what I think you are trying to say in this particular instance, but it avoids the question

Native Americans and the colonists and later law suits and claims

Germany, Poland, France and empires like the Austria-Hungary or Spanish empires -- they owned or claimed land and then... poof!
 
Israel has fought and spilled blood for most of what they got. The parcels they bought were few. They are stealing it daily and bulldozing homes daily. Most of us who have been watching it know the real story.
Really? Who started each war? You make it sound as if Israel started all the wars in order to claim land. Nothing could be further from reality
 
What determines who owns is who paid for it from the previous owner.

Achmed owns a parcel of land. All good. Issac buys it from Achmed then Issac owns it. Why is this so hard for the pallies to understand?
Ownership does not bestow citizenship or sovereignty.
 
Israel has fought and spilled blood for most of what they got. The parcels they bought were few. They are stealing it daily and bulldozing homes daily. Most of us who have been watching it know the real story.
Really? Who started each war? You make it sound as if Israel started all the wars in order to claim land. Nothing could be further from reality
The 67 war was a land grab, PM Begin even said so. If it wasn't a land grab why did they annex Jerusalem, built settlements and still occupy after 40 years against all International norms?

Some Israeli leaders do sometimes tell the truth - Alan Hart
www.alanhart.net/some-israeli-leaders-do-sometimes-tell-the-truth/
Jun 3, 2015 - The single most decisive event that made war inevitable happened on ... grabbing more Arab land including and especially the West Bank. ... of the whole truth about how the stage was set for war in June 1967 is that ... Or so it seemed. .... Six Days War, here's a quote from what Prime Minister Begin said in ...
 
The PLO’s belligerent rhetoric was matched by deeds. Terrorist attacks by the group grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched. The targets were always civilians.(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html
The Israelis were Western Colonial implants by the victors of WWll...The Arabs never consented to the deal forced on them.

Sure the Jews were slaughtered by the Europeans not just the Germans, they needed a safe-haven indeed, but not on making innocent people who lived on this land for a millennia homeless and stateless who had nothing to do with original crime.

Two wrongs do not make a right.
 
The PLO’s belligerent rhetoric was matched by deeds. Terrorist attacks by the group grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched. The targets were always civilians.(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html
The Israelis were Western Colonial implants by the victors of WWll...The Arabs never consented to the deal forced on them.

Sure the Jews were slaughtered by the Europeans not just the Germans, they needed a safe-haven indeed, but not on making innocent people who lived on this land for a millennia homeless and stateless who had nothing to do with original crime.

Two wrongs do not make a right.
The penalty for choosing the wrong side. The Muslims should not have sided with Hitler.
 
The PLO’s belligerent rhetoric was matched by deeds. Terrorist attacks by the group grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched. The targets were always civilians.(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html
The Israelis were Western Colonial implants by the victors of WWll...The Arabs never consented to the deal forced on them.

Sure the Jews were slaughtered by the Europeans not just the Germans, they needed a safe-haven indeed, but not on making innocent people who lived on this land for a millennia homeless and stateless who had nothing to do with original crime.

Two wrongs do not make a right.
The penalty for choosing the wrong side. The Muslims should not have sided with Hitler.
The Palestinians earlier welcomed Jews to Palestine, it was only after realizing Zionists plans did the Welcoming Committee retract it's welcome.
 
The Palestinians earlier welcomed Jews to Palestine, it was only after realizing Zionists plans did the Welcoming Committee retract it's welcome.
If only that were true...

The Zionists (Zionism as an organized movement is generally considered to have been founded by Theodor Herzl in 1897.) existed long before the British bs
 
The PLO’s belligerent rhetoric was matched by deeds. Terrorist attacks by the group grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched. The targets were always civilians.(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html
The Israelis were Western Colonial implants by the victors of WWll...The Arabs never consented to the deal forced on them.

Sure the Jews were slaughtered by the Europeans not just the Germans, they needed a safe-haven indeed, but not on making innocent people who lived on this land for a millennia homeless and stateless who had nothing to do with original crime.

Two wrongs do not make a right.
The penalty for choosing the wrong side. The Muslims should not have sided with Hitler.
The Palestinians earlier welcomed Jews to Palestine, it was only after realizing Zionists plans did the Welcoming Committee retract it's welcome.

Not much of a welcome when their leader joined forces with the Nazis and married Nazism with Arab Islamic nationalism, and exported it to the entire Middle East.

Hitler's Mufti | Catholic Answers

Revered in some circles today as one of the fathers of modern radical Islam, al-Husseini has been the subject of a number of modern studies. Scholars such as David Dalin, John Rothmann, Chuck Morse, and others have courageously brought al-Husseini’s actions to light. "Hitler’s Mufti," as many have called him, had a direct hand in some of the darkest moments of the Holocaust, the slaughter of tens of thousands of Christians, and the formation of some of the most hate-filled generations of modern history. Al-Husseini is a testament to the way that evil finds evil.
 
Israeli nutcakes burn homes with a Palestinian mother, father and child and you expect humanity and flowers in return?

Get off their land.
Who's land? What makes land ownership? Jews living in the area go back thousands of years. As a matter of fact Jews and Arabs are cousins -- the same people, different tribes.

May they kill each other off if they so desire. Give the rest of teh world a rest




Nope they are not cousins as the genetic testing shows, they have a less than 87% match which is about the same as with Aborigines and First nations people.
What determines who owns is who paid for it from the previous owner.

Achmed owns a parcel of land. All good. Issac buys it from Achmed then Issac owns it. Why is this so hard for the pallies to understand?
Ownership does not bestow citizenship or sovereignty.





Yet you use the citizenship of arab muslims to prove it does.. Conversely sovereignty bestows ownership and citizenship.

The best comparison is a stolen car that the thief owns for a short time because it is no longer in your ownership.

What legal right do the arab muslims have to Jewish Palestine under international law before 1948, if they have none then you are supporting a lie
 
Israel has fought and spilled blood for most of what they got. The parcels they bought were few. They are stealing it daily and bulldozing homes daily. Most of us who have been watching it know the real story.
Really? Who started each war? You make it sound as if Israel started all the wars in order to claim land. Nothing could be further from reality
The 67 war was a land grab, PM Begin even said so. If it wasn't a land grab why did they annex Jerusalem, built settlements and still occupy after 40 years against all International norms?

Some Israeli leaders do sometimes tell the truth - Alan Hart
www.alanhart.net/some-israeli-leaders-do-sometimes-tell-the-truth/
Jun 3, 2015 - The single most decisive event that made war inevitable happened on ... grabbing more Arab land including and especially the West Bank. ... of the whole truth about how the stage was set for war in June 1967 is that ... Or so it seemed. .... Six Days War, here's a quote from what Prime Minister Begin said in ...




And yet Israel handed back over 95% of the land they had occupied in 1967, land that contained an oil field and gas field. So if it was about land grabs the Israelis would still be Occupying the Sinai to this day.

Care to explain why the land was given back if the 1967 war was as one person claims about grabbing land. And why Israel released all prisoners locked away in refugee concentration camps where their own arab muslims had locked them away
 
The PLO’s belligerent rhetoric was matched by deeds. Terrorist attacks by the group grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched. The targets were always civilians.(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html
The Israelis were Western Colonial implants by the victors of WWll...The Arabs never consented to the deal forced on them.

Sure the Jews were slaughtered by the Europeans not just the Germans, they needed a safe-haven indeed, but not on making innocent people who lived on this land for a millennia homeless and stateless who had nothing to do with original crime.

Two wrongs do not make a right.




Get it right the only part they did not consent to was the Jewish NATIONal home part.

The only people who had lived on the land for millennia were the Jews as the arab muslims were evicted after 22 years in 1099, only returning is small numbers some time in the 19C.

Being muslims was a crime in itself if you read the koran and hadiths that command all muslims to " KILL THE JEWS "

As you say two wrongs don't make a right, and the world has realised this now after it capitulated to islamonazi demands and violence
 
The PLO’s belligerent rhetoric was matched by deeds. Terrorist attacks by the group grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched. The targets were always civilians.(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html
The Israelis were Western Colonial implants by the victors of WWll...The Arabs never consented to the deal forced on them.

Sure the Jews were slaughtered by the Europeans not just the Germans, they needed a safe-haven indeed, but not on making innocent people who lived on this land for a millennia homeless and stateless who had nothing to do with original crime.

Two wrongs do not make a right.
The penalty for choosing the wrong side. The Muslims should not have sided with Hitler.




Or the Ottomans prior to 1917, that is why the Palestinian arab muslims were not given any lands in the mandate of palestine
 
The PLO’s belligerent rhetoric was matched by deeds. Terrorist attacks by the group grew more frequent. In 1965, 35 raids were conducted against Israel. In 1966, the number increased to 41. In just the first four months of 1967, 37 attacks were launched. The targets were always civilians.(3) http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/67_War.html
The Israelis were Western Colonial implants by the victors of WWll...The Arabs never consented to the deal forced on them.

Sure the Jews were slaughtered by the Europeans not just the Germans, they needed a safe-haven indeed, but not on making innocent people who lived on this land for a millennia homeless and stateless who had nothing to do with original crime.

Two wrongs do not make a right.
The penalty for choosing the wrong side. The Muslims should not have sided with Hitler.
The Palestinians earlier welcomed Jews to Palestine, it was only after realizing Zionists plans did the Welcoming Committee retract it's welcome.



What history books are you reading, do you start on the last page and read them backwards ?
 
The penalty for choosing the wrong side. The Muslims should not have sided with Hitler.

and the Chinese with MAO did not choose the Japanese

wtf is wrong with you delusional Israeli supporters? You are your own worst enemy. You do a HUGE disservice to your cause



The arab muslims from that part of the area sided with the losers so they could eliminate the Jews as their religion commanded. The Ottomans knew the only way to attract arab muslims would be to have fertile farms for them to walk onto, so they invited the Jews to do the hard work. The arab muslims came too early and found that the land still needed more work, and the methods of agriculture were alien to them. Then along came WW1 and the world was in turmoil, and the arab muslims sided with the Ottomans and lost. Side with the losing side and you lose as well
 
Nope they are not cousins as the genetic testing shows, they have a less than 87% match which is about the same as with Aborigines and First nations people.
Idiot! You are comparing European Jews with Arabs. European Jews do not come from the Levant. But there were Jews who stayed in the area and they are from the original Hebrews .. the Semitic tribe
 
The arab muslims from that part of the area sided with the losers so they could eliminate the Jews as their religion commanded. The Ottomans knew the only way to attract arab muslims would be to have fertile farms for them to walk onto, so they invited the Jews to do the hard work. The arab muslims came too early and found that the land still needed more work, and the methods of agriculture were alien to them. Then along came WW1 and the world was in turmoil, and the arab muslims sided with the Ottomans and lost. Side with the losing side and you lose as well

you sound like a very sick person. You sound like one of those far right religious settlers.

gawd, people like you are living in your minds in a far distant past. You make the radical Islamists look modern by comparison
 

Forum List

Back
Top