P F Tinmore
Diamond Member
- Dec 6, 2009
- 79,799
- 4,414
- 1,815
Very true. Yet that still is not my point. You have stated that it's a bad thing destroying houses. I asked if that is the same conclusion you get into, in this case as well.
"Bad" is not the term I used. I stated that home demolition as a collective punishment is illegal.
BTW, Israel spent a lot of money destroying settlement homes when it left Gaza. Wouldn't it have been more profitable, and provide good will, to sell those homes on the open market?
Will you be willing to give your house to an Al Quaeda man if being expelled from there by your own government?
Because that is how the settlers saw it. They would have prefered to burn down their own houses, and not let the Palestinian enemy touch it.
I would have probably done the same thing
Besides, the idea was to give back Gaza in the same way that wad recieved. a big nothing.
Will you be willing to give your house to an Al Quaeda man...
Wow, have they been duped by the propaganda.
Because that is how the settlers saw it.
Of course. They think they own everything.
Besides, the idea was to give back Gaza in the same way that wad recieved. a big nothing.
Are you saying that it was a land without people for a people without land?