Thank you, California Girl.
I wonder what the Queen said about that?
The Queen doesn't comment on such issues.
She's such a pussy!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Thank you, California Girl.
I wonder what the Queen said about that?
The Queen doesn't comment on such issues.
No I am suggesting that most of those 1.5 billion Muslims believe they have a duty to overthrow peacefully through the political process or through violence the secular government of any country they reside in and replace it with a system that treats Muslims as superior to everyone else (that can be a minor expression of that i.e. change in cultural norms to an extreme superior in law expression of that).Caliphate - Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaWTF is a Caliphate?
The term caliphate (from the Arabic خلافة or khilāfa) refers to the first system of governance established in Islam. The most common translation for the word which appears in the Quran is vicegerency (or caretaker). It is a constitutional republic, which means that the rulers are bound by a set of laws which they cannot break at a whim, and the people have the right to appoint their leader through their local leaders and should the leaders divert from their obligations as vicegerents, the people have the right to remove them.
It was initially led by Prophet Muhammad's companions as a continuation of the political authority the Prophet established, known in Arabic as Khulufaa'u Rashidin or English 'Rashidun Caliphate (Rightly Guided Caliphate)'. It represented the political and theological unity of the Muslim Ummah, and was the world's first major welfare state.[1][2] A "caliphate" is also a state which implements such a government.
Sunni Islam dictates that the head of state, the caliph, should be selected by Shura - elected by Muslims or their representatives.[3] Followers of Shia Islam believe the caliph should be an imam descended in a line from the Ahl al-Bayt. After the Rashidun period until 1924, caliphates, sometimes two at a single time, real and illusory, were ruled by dynasties. The first dynasty was the Umayyad. This was followed by the Abbasid, the Fatimid, and finally the Ottoman Dynasty.
The caliphate was "the core political concept of Sunni Islam, by the consensus of the Muslim majority in the early centuries."[4]
Where are you going with this, hipeter? Are you suggesting that 1.5 Billion Muslims believe they have a duty to overthrow the secular government of any country they reside in and replace it with a theocracy?
I'm having trouble swallowing that.
Yup... those PEACEFUL muslims... all they want to do is PRAY... they're so PEACEFUL and PROUD and of their BASTARD religion that they have COVER THEIR COWARDLY FACES...
quote]
Notice the E, S and G on those signs, they all seem to have been written by the same person
They pray in the streets because there are no mosques to accomodate them?
And?
Yup... those PEACEFUL muslims... all they want to do is PRAY... they're so PEACEFUL and PROUD and of their BASTARD religion that they have COVER THEIR COWARDLY FACES...
quote]
Notice the E, S and G on those signs, they all seem to have been written by the same person
So what? the same person isn't holding them all.
Your numbered points appear accurate. What is erroneous is the people who extend those points to believe somehow America is in distress from those actions, or that our law enforcement will idly sit by and allow similar law breaking to happen here. This is foolishness.
Your numbered points appear accurate. What is erroneous is the people who extend those points to believe somehow America is in distress from those actions, or that our law enforcement will idly sit by and allow similar law breaking to happen here. This is foolishness.
Are you illiterate or did you purposefully decide to misconstrue the point I just made? You are right in saying public displays of religion aren't illegal in America. That's why I specifically stated that I doubt "our law enforcement will idly sit by and allow similar law breaking to happen". I did NOT say "the same actions". The focus is clearly on the law breaking, which is why I used the term, LAW BREAKING.Your numbered points appear accurate. What is erroneous is the people who extend those points to believe somehow America is in distress from those actions, or that our law enforcement will idly sit by and allow similar law breaking to happen here. This is foolishness.
You're foolish. In America public displays of religion aren't illegal. They are in France.
Let's hope you're right. But can I just say.... the French police are not generally known for being scared to tackle tough issues. They can kick ass with the best of police forces. It is as much political pressure than keeps them from enforcing French law. Let me ask you this, if we have a Democrat in the White House, can you see the political will to take on this kind of issue when it crosses the pond? Because it will cross.... and while I am perfectly happy for Muslims to be part of American society, I'm damned if I think we should make any allowances for Sharia law in the US. It is fundamentally against everything we are as a nation.