- Thread starter
- #21
I agree we shouldn't have done anything there. When are we going to learn our fucking lesson? No one has ever benefited from invading or occupying the middle east. There is nothing there for us. We don't need their oil, and that's the only thing worth having an interest in over there.Obama created the current situation in the middle east. Do you like it? We didn't occupy Libya, we destroyed the government then left it a failed stateCatastrophic war might as well be the name of the middle east. America has nothing to gain from invading and occupying ANYTHING in the middle east.Too late to preempt anything at this point. a strong American means war is less likely, but we are seen as weak under Obama. Hence catastrophic war is more likely laterWe invented modern pre-emptive war under the lunacy of the GOP. That's far more dangerous than anything Obama's done."We've never gone to war because we were too strong" People like Obama make catastrophic war more likely
Damn now what? Somebody is going to have to clean up Obama's messI agree we shouldn't have done anything there. When are we going to learn our fucking lesson? No one has ever benefited from invading or occupying the middle east. There is nothing there for us. We don't need their oil, and that's the only thing worth having an interest in over there.Obama created the current situation in the middle east. Do you like it? We didn't occupy Libya, we destroyed the government then left it a failed stateCatastrophic war might as well be the name of the middle east. America has nothing to gain from invading and occupying ANYTHING in the middle east.Too late to preempt anything at this point. a strong American means war is less likely, but we are seen as weak under Obama. Hence catastrophic war is more likely laterWe invented modern pre-emptive war under the lunacy of the GOP. That's far more dangerous than anything Obama's done."We've never gone to war because we were too strong" People like Obama make catastrophic war more likely