Is This Their Next Move? Dems Mulling Not Certifying Trump If He Wins

[scruffy]

sounds like they may be planning an insurrection.

In which case America should dogpile on these fucked up leftards. Make their lives truly miserable.

 

[scruffy]

Can you provide specific examples of the violence, propaganda and intimidation to influence the political outcomes involving Democrats.

I have literally hundreds of examples of Republicans doing ALL of these things.

Don't start me, slimy leftard.

 

[Road Runner]

So where are all the democrats shouting election interference and unconstitutional now?

 

[Esoteric Inkling]

 

[OKTexas]

Only a shit refuses to accept the will of the people.

Are you talking about this commie freak? From the OP:

While Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) conceded that there could be violence, he said it wouldn’t necessarily stop them from trying to disqualify him. “We might just decide that’s something we need to prepare for.”

I wonder if he knows the house doesn't have the constitutional authority to unilaterally disqualify anyone, with the exception of members of the house. If they try any shit they may find out why Americans own so many AR-15s.

.

 

[OKTexas]

Oh, puh-leeeeeze...

Nobody on the other side is seriously contemplating not certifying election results...

That's the domain of your ignorant, arrogant amoral piece-of-$hit un-American Orange Baboon-God...

The quote from commie raskin says you're full of it.

.

 

[IM2]

Things are already a MESS because Liberals are controlling the country, sadly.

Only in your imagination.

 

[IM2]

Are you talking about this commie freak? From the OP:

While Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) conceded that there could be violence, he said it wouldn’t necessarily stop them from trying to disqualify him. “We might just decide that’s something we need to prepare for.”

I wonder if he knows the house doesn't have the constitutional authority to unilaterally disqualify anyone, with the exception of members of the house. If they try any shit they may find out why Americans own so many AR-15s.

.

Trump incited an insurrection. He disqualified himself.

 

[OKTexas]

Defend democracy by burning the Republic to the ground. That checks out. They know not how to build, only destroy.

It's the only way for them to get their fundamental transformation of the country.

.

 

[Esoteric Inkling]

 

[Care4all]

Are you talking about this commie freak? From the OP:

While Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) conceded that there could be violence, he said it wouldn’t necessarily stop them from trying to disqualify him. “We might just decide that’s something we need to prepare for.”

I wonder if he knows the house doesn't have the constitutional authority to unilaterally disqualify anyone, with the exception of members of the house. If they try any shit they may find out why Americans own so many AR-15s.

.

You didn't read the source article, you only read the right wing propaganda, about the article OKTexas.

They were talking about the supreme court, and what their decision may say and do, which could be throwing the insurrection disqualification to Congress to decide...

 

[BluesLegend]

That would, indeed, be an Insurrection.... your Orange POS was behind one... Old Uncle Joe hasn't come anywhere close.

Opposing Democrats is the greatest display of patriotism since the founders fought the British! Yes the founders were MAGA!!!!

 

[OKTexas]

You didn't read the source article, you only read the right wing propaganda, about the article OKTexas.

They were talking about the supreme court, and what their decision may say and do, which could be throwing the insurrection disqualification to Congress to decide...

Law enforcement has already made that decision, since not one person has been charged under the insurrection act. The term "insurrection" has been used, by political actors, trying to score political points, nothing more. There is absolutely nothing the house could legitimately do to change any of that.

.

 

[WEATHER53]

We disputed the election but never had a feasible effort to stop it or change it
If Dems try to thwart the will of the voting public then that would fit the Classic Definition of All Elements of Insurrection

 

[WEATHER53]

Law enforcement has already made that decision, since not one person has been charged under the insurrection act. The term "insurrection" has been used, by political actors, trying to score political points, nothing more. There is absolutely nothing the house could legitimately do to change any of that.

.

It’s a media fabrication term that libs naturally locked on to

 

[eagle7-31]

The ever erudite and sophisticated adults at the Atlantic show Democrats considering a new version of "DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!" (tm) in their latest superior and well credentialed rhetorical flourish.

Things could get ugly folks.



From the article:





And it gets profoundly worse:

You wanna see blatant, even dangerous hypocrisy?

RATskin is the masterclass.

Is This Their Next Move? Article Reveals Some Dems Mulling Not Certifying Trump If He Wins (Updated)

redstate.com

With the jarring realization that their electoral goose may be cooked in November, the Dems are shockingly becoming even more unhinged and a threat to the very nation they purport to defend.

The demrats and Bush/Cheney/McConnell will stop at virtually nothing to keep Trump from winning in 2024. 91 phony bs indictments, Stasi prosecutors like Bragg, Smith and James.

 

[Kondor3]

We disputed the election but never had a feasible effort to stop it or change it
If Dems try to thwart the will of the voting public then that would fit the Classic Definition of All Elements of Insurrection

"Pot.... meet Kettle..."

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Law enforcement has already made that decision, since not one person has been charged under the insurrection act. The term "insurrection" has been used, by political actors, trying to score political points, nothing more. There is absolutely nothing the house could legitimately do to change any of that.

.

Several people have been charged and convicted of "seditious conspiracy".
"Now I don't know what that is...but it sounds bad".

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[Kondor3]

Several people have been charged and convicted of "seditious conspiracy".
"Now I don't know what that is...but it sounds bad".

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

www.law.cornell.edu

No one has to be formally charged with Insurrection for an actual "insurrection" to have taken place.

For example... a coroner can return a verdict of "homicide" for a death but the lack of formal charges does not change the facts.

What is lacking here is an authoritative declaration or proclamation stipulating that an Insurrection had, indeed, taken place.

Armed with a Federal -level authoritative declaration along those lines the Colorado ballot-banning would have withstood scrutiny.

But, as usual, the shortsighted idiot Democrats missed that glaringly obvious and oh-so-necessary prelude to any such charges.

These idiot LibProg Dems would phukk-up a two-car funeral... damned-near as bad as the MAGA Korrupt Klown Kar...

 

[OKTexas]

Several people have been charged and convicted of "seditious conspiracy".
"Now I don't know what that is...but it sounds bad".

18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

www.law.cornell.edu

Yeah, sounds bad, but it's not this:

18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

www.law.cornell.edu

.