Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Dog owner hits back | Bendigo Advertiser | Dangerous Dogs in the News
Now the dog is apparently not a pit bull, but a Rottie. No matter what the breed, the stupid woman who ignored her is at fault.
The dog is dangerous, but might be salvageable. The woman is a moron and is not.
The dog was only aggressive when the woman approached it, remember. It probably wouldn't have attacked anyone had she paid attention.
The dog was only aggressive when the woman approached it, remember. It probably wouldn't have attacked anyone had she paid attention.
That is the owner's story that she warned the victim. The victim said she was visiting her mother in hospital in Arnold Street when she approached a woman and her Rottweiler walking in the street about 6pm.
She said the dog lunged at her and latched onto her right arm, dragging her to the ground.
If the dog was on a leash then the woman who was told to stay back is at fault.
No. The toucher has an immediate cut throatSo the question remains.....why is the dog being held???
It would be like someone wanting to touch your kid. You say no. They touch them anyway. Does the kid get taken away? No.
very old bump, but im a dog trainer- the #1 rule, besides dog being on a leash and owner having dog walk close by beside or behind is NEVER ALLOW ANYONE to touch your dog- period. The dog must allow you in, not the other way around. The dog needs to come to you not you get in its space/face. Bite waiting to happen. Only about 3% or less of dogs are truly aggressive/not fearful.
OK. I have a 5 year old little girl.So the question remains.....why is the dog being held???
It would be like someone wanting to touch your kid. You say no. They touch them anyway. Does the kid get taken away? No.
I've noticed that you don't even entertain the notion that the woman walking the dangerous animal has any responsibility for controlling it in the first place.Story around here for the last few weeks. Woman gets bitten on the arm by a pit bull, needs surgery.
Woman is walking near the hospital, sees another woman walking her dog. Dog does not have a muzzle. Woman approaches dog, and woman with dog says not to go near it, she has rescued it several weeks ago from an abusive family, does not know how dog will react.
Woman ignores requests not to approach, walks up to dog, bends over to give it a pat. Dog attacks her, biting her arm. She gets free, tells owner that dog should have had a muzzle. Woman with dog replies that no muzzle fits, and that she said not to approach the dog. Woman who is injured then says that dog is dangerous and should not be on the streets.
Woman has surgery, dog is seized by council and may yet be destroyed. Injured 'victim' previously worked with council, seizing dangerous dogs, which makes this case so ridiculous.
Who is to blame here? The stupid bitch who ignored requests to stay away from the animal, or the dog for feeling scared and protecting itself? What should happen to the dog?
That's easy to say if you own a bunny rabbit. A Rottweiller is an entirely different animal. Owning a potentially dangerous to life and limb animal like a Rottweiler comes with a responsibility, not only for the welfare of the animal, but also to the general public at large. Even if the public at large is deaf dumb blind and retarded IMO.So the question remains.....why is the dog being held???
It would be like someone wanting to touch your kid. You say no. They touch them anyway. Does the kid get taken away? No.
Anyways, I don't think just "a bite" is enough to destroy the animal. If it was an attack, then okay, but just for a bite on the hand or arm, whatever it was?
I could use your analogy Gracie, and say kids bite other kids all the time, do we put them down? No.
OK. I have a 5 year old little girl.So the question remains.....why is the dog being held???
It would be like someone wanting to touch your kid. You say no. They touch them anyway. Does the kid get taken away? No.
That little girl is my responsibility. Morally and legally, I am that child's guardian, period.
If I am walking down a path with my little girl and some stranger is walking the opposite way towards us, whose fault is it if the stranger is someone like Joe Biden and he suddenly tries to grab her and sniff her hair or something and she gets frightened and bites him in the face or kicks him in the balls?
Isn't it my responsibility, as her guardian and the only mentally sound adult in the scenario, to do whatever is necessary to physically put myself between them to stop that interaction from happening in the first place?
Case in point.
Granted, all it took from Sessions was a very minimal slap on Biden's hand, a gesture really, to thwart Biden and deescalate the potentially violent or at least creepy encounter, but the fact that Sessions was the adult in the room meant that nobody got hurt.
Sessions is the Biden whisperer.