Is The American Bar Association Racist??

Biff_Poindexter

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2018
26,844
14,774
1,415
USA


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating without asking to see her LSAT's?? or other critical high school documents?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big here.
 


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating; without asking to see her LSAT's?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white judicial nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big.
Using the word Democracy to bring in totalitarianism is still totalitarianism.
 


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating without asking to see her LSAT's?? or other critical high school documents?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big here.
She's a GD BLM woke piece of mother fucking shit. No place for that GD women except cleaning houses
 


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating without asking to see her LSAT's?? or other critical high school documents?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big here.
The American Bar Association is useless and lacks any authority.
 


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating without asking to see her LSAT's?? or other critical high school documents?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big here.
Arent judges supposed to be followers of the constitution, not rewriters of the constitution?
 


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating without asking to see her LSAT's?? or other critical high school documents?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big here.
Clearly they favor Blacks ... and latinos and all others who don't share our values. Asians probably work hard, but they may be geneitcally advantaged.
 


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating without asking to see her LSAT's?? or other critical high school documents?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big here.
They said the same thing about Alito....so, no I don't think it makes them racist.
 


"The American Bar Association (ABA) said Friday that Ketanji Brown Jackson is "well qualified" — its highest rating — to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court ahead of her confirmation hearings next week. The ABA, which "confines its evaluation to the qualities of integrity, professional competence, and judicial temperament," unanimously agreed that Jackson is "well qualified," committee chair Ann Claire Williams wrote in a letter to the chair and ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee."

With that decision, the ABA has basically rendered themselves a useless, laughing stock organization...or quite possibly, this signals something much more sinister. Has the ABA become a racist organization right before our eyes?? The previous 2 judicial nominees to the SC were also well-qualified -- however, we have no reason to be suspicious of these ratings...we can look at them and easily tell they are well-qualified...however, why would the ABA give that rating to someone who is obviously not of the same caliber of the previous nominees? Someone who is quite obviously, inferior.

And why would they give Jackson that rating without asking to see her LSAT's?? or other critical high school documents?? They saw the previous nominees test scores and high school transcripts; why were they being harder on the "white nominees" and not Jackson? Tucker may be onto something big here.
ABA---LIE on a regular basis (they are attorney's afterall) who go through great lengths to cover for other corrupt attorneys. They prefer judges like Jackson that allow criminals off as that is good for business for slimey attorneys which is their organization to get crooks including Jacksons favorite pedophiles off or with lighter sentences.
 
Tell me Struth how do you feel about Flip Flop Grahams acting today? Do you think this black woman is unqualified to serve on the SC?
how did he flip flop?

i am glad to see the GoP not play politics with her nor attack her with lies ans smears, or over run the capitol with brownshirts like the dems have some in the past
 
how did he flip flop?

i am glad to see the GoP not play politics with her nor attack her with lies ans smears, or over run the capitol with brownshirts like the dems have some in the past
Hell that is all they have done. Graham voted for her to be on the Appellate Court just last year, now all of a sudden she is unqualified.

Three Republicans voted last year to confirm Jackson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.).

What changed Struth? Flip Flop Graham made a fool out of himself yesterday.

Tell me Struth what makes her unqualified to sit on the highest court of the land? Is it that hard for you to support another black woman?
 
Hell that is all they have done. Graham voted for her to be on the Appellate Court just last year, now all of a sudden she is unqualified.

Three Republicans voted last year to confirm Jackson to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit: Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska) and Lindsey Graham (S.C.).

What changed Struth? Flip Flop Graham made a fool out of himself yesterday.

Tell me Struth what makes her unqualified to sit on the highest court of the land? Is it that hard for you to support another black woman?
I suppose the same thing that changed when Dems flip flopped on Alito and Gorsuch....
 

Forum List

Back
Top