BuddyColt
Member
- Thread starter
- #101
Hey dumbass, the guy was charged with eluding authorities, NOT improper entry. This is dealt with in the first four posts of the thread.
Guess you missed the last part of the ruling as well.
Buddy, you are wasting you time with these folks. They have an agenda.
Lie_ability is po'd because he wife left him for an illegal alien.
Go fig.
.
First of all, asshole, you are not allowed to violate the no family rule.
Secondly, I happen to be 100% correct on the law. Your idiot pal, BuddyDouche, is an imbecile as are you.
You can't even admit you're dead wrong when it is established unequivocally.
You have zero honesty, no honor and not even a hint of integrity.
Fuck off, ya ignorant dishonest pissant.
,
;
-
,
Liability has the time to try and prove he's 100 percent wrong, but everybody has their "dog in the fight" and somebody today attacked me, accusing me of having a family member that was one of those "illegal" aliens.
Liability cannot read. Sure, there are immigration crimes as per his statistics, but improper entry is not one of them. He claims I'm lying, but I have the words of the TOP IMMIGRATION OFFICIALS IN THE UNITED STATES telling him that crossing the border is not a crime... nor is presence without papers.
A conviction for eluding the authorities is mentioned in Title 8, but it is prosecuted as a Title 18 crime. Improper Entry is not mentioned in Title 18.
Liability is a liability to good common sense.