Is carnivorism ethical?

In my opinion, this cannot be justified by logical means, because if you can eat someone else's meat, then someone else can eat your meat, therefore nothing prevents cannibalism. If you accept the point of view of a meat-eater, then you should not be indignant that someone ate your child.
beremennost-u-korov-kak-opredelit-skolko-dlitsya-i-kak-protekaet-30.jpg
yes--just your OPINION
 
Actually retard what happens is the herds grow to big eat all the available food and then the herds starve to death,
Actually, when food is scarce, fertility is also inhibited, so no one dies of hunger.
 
Predators are not needed, they can all be killed. The herbivore population is regulated naturally, by the base of food in nature. No food no animals

Right. So remove all predators and the herbivore populations are doomed to a slow starvation and rampant illness. How ethical of you. Have you ever seen herbivores starving? Have you ever seen them sick from poor nutrition because of that starvation?
 
Good god keep proving how idiotic and stupid vegans are, Hymans are Omnivores we are designed to eat meat.

Jesus Christ. It doesn't surprise the stupid things people believe but it puzzles me at how they arrive there.
What's going on his mind.
 
Stupidity is unfounded accusations of stupidity without arguments, such behavior is a de facto hysterical admission of defeat
 
Stupidity is unfounded accusations of stupidity without arguments, such behavior is a de facto hysterical admission of defeat

Stupidity is suggesting that natural predators are vile. Stupidity is suggesting that the natural balance be maintained by starvation of the entire ecosystem.
 
Right. So remove all predators and the herbivore populations are doomed to a slow starvation
No, this has already been discussed above. And this is generally nonsense
Why don't you, according to this logic, have a population of maniacs who would regulate your population by eating your children.
 
Predators are not needed, they can all be killed. The herbivore population is regulated naturally, by the base of food in nature. No food no animals

1632995575855.png


Ya' know this is the kind of thinking that happens when you don't have enough proteins in your diet.

However...

Why ague that only predators be eliminated. Shouldn't the base food supply, vegetation, be even more protected and sacred?

All those evil animals eating those poor harmless plants that only want to grow up to be big plants far away from those carnivorous animals that disrupt their very existence.

What did a poor harmless plant do to anything else?

Plant rights now!

*****CHUCKLE*****



:)
 
It doesn't matter, the main thing is that they didn't refuse.

They tried to refuse. Wild cattle would run from humans. The humans had to trap them to gain access to the milk.

Oh, and the milk produced by a cow, in the natural environment, is to feed her calf. If the cow "gave" her milk to humans, what did the calf do?
 
No, this has already been discussed above. And this is generally nonsense
Why don't you, according to this logic, have a population of maniacs who would regulate your population by eating your children.

Yes, it has been discussed and explained to you. But you refuse to accept the truth about herbivores starving.

And if the herbivores are allowed to overpopulation, they strip the land of vegetation. Having lower birth rates does not save them. They die a slow death from starvation. They cannot stop eating and allow the vegetation the time to regrow. And every other species in the area suffers.
 
Have you studied any history at all?
In order not to look like a fool, study the anatomy and morphology of a person, find out whether he feels sweet tast, like a herbivore, whether he digests carbohydrates like a herbivore, whether he has a long intestine like a herbivore, or does he have a powerful jaw, long fangs, a predator's bite, and so on.
 
Yes, it has been discussed and explained to you. But you refuse to accept the truth about herbivores starving.

And if the herbivores are allowed to overpopulation, they strip the land of vegetation. Having lower birth rates does not save them. They die a slow death from starvation. They cannot stop eating and allow the vegetation the time to regrow. And every other species in the area suffers.
If you are not able to understand my explanations, there is nothing I can do to help
 
In order not to look like a fool, study the anatomy and morphology of a person, find out whether he feels sweet tast, like a herbivore, whether he digests carbohydrates like a herbivore, whether he has a long intestine like a herbivore, or does he have a powerful jaw, long fangs, a predator's bite, and so on.
The Left is all about telling us how they wish human nature was, instead of understanding what it actually is.

With the global warming craze, I'm sure they will outlaw meat in the near future.
 
No, this has already been discussed above. And this is generally nonsense
Why don't you, according to this logic, have a population of maniacs who would regulate your population by eating your children.

rupol, what exactly is it that you propose? That everyone stop eating meat completely?

Hmm.....there are over 94 million head of cattle in the US. There are around 75 million pigs in the US. If they were suddenly not a food source, farmers would no longer feed them and take care of them. Do you really want to see the environmental disaster that would come from having 94 million cows and 75 million pigs foraging for their own food?
 

Forum List

Back
Top