Tommy Tainant
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
Where is the lie ? Cant people change their name ? It belpmgs to them.So forcing someone to lie is ok in your book, follow the science asshole!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Where is the lie ? Cant people change their name ? It belpmgs to them.So forcing someone to lie is ok in your book, follow the science asshole!
Doesnt mantion trannys.
Elsewhere it mentions adulterers and yet you vote for one. So please fucking save me your fake christianity.
well let's start with the Very BASIC for you. GOd's word says there there are..MALE .....and FEMALE....it doesn't matter about your feelings or your confusion or how angry you are with PResident Trump, we are to act in accordance with the BIOLOGICAL REALITY of God's good design. Trans falls short of the glory of God and is not the way to walk in obedience to God's word.What did Jesus say about trannies ?
jail is probably the best place for him. It keeps the kids and staff safe. Anybody who drivves 4 hours a day to stand in the rain has serious mental issues. Hell, I wouldnt tdrive for 4 hours a day for a fuck.
All of this time he is on full pay. The school could be spending that money on education and not compensating a nutter. The system iss rigged in favour of crazies. Throw away the key.
What did Jesus say about trannies ?
trumper trashsexually immoral,
I most certainly do not give adulterers a pass, you said trannies, so I posted a verse about such!
Rot in hell queer boy!
No real compassion or understanding .
He clearly has huge problems and the last place that will probably do him any good is prison .
Don't use this unwell man as a convenience when system problems are so clear .
Make the punishment fit the crime in every sense and respect .
Enoch is still in jail and the kids are safe from this freak.
Can someone explain to me how the Sovereign got the power to compel a teacher, with the force of law, to utter falsehoods?
If a student is, for example, a boy whose legal name is George, how can a teacher be sanctioned for addressing him as "George" and using appropriate male pronouns when referring to him?
This is a serious question. How is it that he is punished for addressing reality as it exists, and not according to an individual's delusions? If the student believed he were Napoleon Bonaparte, would the teacher be required to call him, "Nappie"? Could the teacher be sanctioned for not doing so?
Europe is BEGGING their citizens to rise up and revolt. Like a Serial Killer taunting the police to "catch me before I kill again"
He is in contempt of court. The court oedered him to stay away from the school and he ignored the order.I did not understand why he is in jail. What exactly is his crime? Why do you think he is dangerous for children?
Frank you know that Europe is lots of different places.Europe is BEGGING their citizens to rise up and revolt. Like a Serial Killer taunting the police to "catch me before I kill again"
He needs medical help. His obsession is unhealthy.He was fired from his school as far as I understood. But he ignored it to be fired. Why prison? Why not an electronic monitoring?
Frank you know that Europe is lots of different places.
He is in contempt of court. The court oedered him to stay away from the school and he ignored the order.
You need to listen to the judge or stuff happens.
He needs medical help. His obsession is unhealthy.
I am not an Irish legal expert. I understand that he was asked to give undertakings but refused to even acknowledge the court.Eh? Why is he in prison if he has a psychiatric problem? As far as I heard has his problem nothing to do with genderism. If he is fired then he is fired. That's it. He has not to enter the school any longer. Is this a new form of stalking? Why is this man doing what? What's the problem to say to him: "Sir, you are fired! Please leave the school and do not come back again!"
I am not an Irish legal expert. I understand that he was asked to give undertakings but refused to even acknowledge the court.
But the kids need protecting from these peeople.
Obsessivec bigots are always a bomb waiting to go off. The court was very lenient towards him but he ignored that.Who are "these people" (=¿your personal enemies because you follow another ideology?) and why need kids "to be protected" from him? For me the situaion is very clear now. He was fired. The reason for this I do not know. Right or wrong I do not know. But he did not try to clear this problem in front of a labour court. Somehow he "stalked" his old school. How is a mystery to me. Normally no one is able to enter a school who has not the right to enter. School massacres are everywhere possible. I'm not sure what I see here between all the shadows of fake-thoughts - but is this perhaps only a storm in a tea cup?
In a school in Germany for example someone is theoretcally able to be fired because he is using gender language when it is forbidden to use this form of language in school. I do not expect this will ever happen. But theoretically the opposite - not to use gender language - could also be a problem. Both - to use gender language and not to use gender language - should not be a problem for a good teacher.
I personally think the use of gender language in Germany is very intransparent and in most cases just simple grammatically wrong. Very simple example: Someone could say "Good morning, pupils" in the way "Guten Morgen, Schüler" but also "Guten Morgen, Schülerinnen und Schüler" (Good morning female pupils and [male] pupils" (Traditionally women are named first on reason to show respect for women - also in case a woman says so. But she could also change this priority what would normally cause a smile.) And gender language would be in this case "Guten Morgen, Schüler:innen". The ":" is in this case a very little break in the flow of language.
The strange thing for me is it that this form is not only superflous but also grammatically wrong. The not spoken articles in this examples (male, female, neuter and none) have not really somehting to do with the sex of a person. The ending "-in" makes something female in sense of sex. The male equivalent would be "Schülerich" - but this sounds in German ridiculous. No one would do so because it is prejoriativce (but also very funny) to do so.
In reality a teacher would say for example "God morning, pupils - and also you, Charles." - who brings very fast back the wet blackboard eraser and takes the tablecloth for to make dry the seat of the boy who is nomally sitting in front.