bertramhall
Member
- Aug 14, 2015
- 87
- 32
- 21
Obama enthusiastically advocates Iranian deal while there are still many opponents to the agreement. It seems to me that Iran wins its strategic game bargaining concessions for Iranian detainees in the US and continuing its nuc program on slightly restricted conditions.
On the one hand the US disapproval would have been a blow to the US reputation as a negotiator. The denial of an agreement always shows unreliability of a partner given that the other world power agreed to the conditions of the treaty. Moreover, the disapproval would have marked Democrat`s incapability for carrying on their political line in the run up for the elections.
On the other hand an approval of the deal means that Iran could proceed their nuclear program almost without any obstacle as it is for Tehran to authorize monitoring commissions. Long-lasted negotiations finally resulted with the Iran`s main intention not to eliminate uranium production. As a consequence Iran achieved its goal and benefit the agreement.
In my opinion the US lose more than gains in both situations. What would you chose? Which one of two evils is lesser for you?
On the one hand the US disapproval would have been a blow to the US reputation as a negotiator. The denial of an agreement always shows unreliability of a partner given that the other world power agreed to the conditions of the treaty. Moreover, the disapproval would have marked Democrat`s incapability for carrying on their political line in the run up for the elections.
On the other hand an approval of the deal means that Iran could proceed their nuclear program almost without any obstacle as it is for Tehran to authorize monitoring commissions. Long-lasted negotiations finally resulted with the Iran`s main intention not to eliminate uranium production. As a consequence Iran achieved its goal and benefit the agreement.
In my opinion the US lose more than gains in both situations. What would you chose? Which one of two evils is lesser for you?