IOF troops killed 7000 Palestinians in past ten years

[docmauser1]

Also civilians, per se, are not protected persons under the Geneva convention.

Now we're talking, that palistanian agitprop "civilian" babble is, indeed, boring.

Settlers are not considered protected persons.

Settlers, calling others settlers, is still funny.

Attacks on settlers is not terrorism.

And then we have a boring palistanian babble.

 

[docmauser1]

In the course of the judgement the Court noted that the settlers cannot rely upon the provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention (whose humanitarian provisions the government has undertaken to apply in the Occupied Territories), since they do not constitute protected persons under Article 4.

• Oh, the desire of the leftists in the israeli supreme court to be holier, than the pope, is known
• Do we always have to use arguments that say joze are better?
• What belligerent occupation Aharon Barak was babbling about in that ruling, if the international court of justice wasn't at all sure any "occupation" existed in the first place? Must be the holier thing.