Internet Has Fun With Pam Bondi After "Bizarro" Testimony

[skews13]

As many on social media noted, Bondi refused to join that investigation that led to a $25 million payment from the president, but was only too happy to accept a $25,000 donation from Donald Trump for her re-election campaign, just as she was deciding on whether or not to investigate him.

Bondi rocketed to the number two trending item on Twitter within minutes of speaking.

On social media some are calling it “bizarro world”:


‘Bizarro world’: Trump baffles the internet by sending Pam Bondi to defend him — after she gave a pass to his fake university – Alternet.org

Why does she still have a law license? Why has she not been brought up on ethics violations?

 

[ColonelAngus]

The left definitely needs to try to discredit her after that absolute destruction of the Bidens.

What was untrue about her OPENING STATEMENT? (Corrected from “testimony” based on advice from my free counsel, Johnlaw.)

 

[JLW]

The left definitely needs to try to discredit her after that absolute destruction of the Bidens.

What was untrue about her testimony?

Bonds did not testify she gave an opening statement.

 

[ColonelAngus]

The left definitely needs to try to discredit her after that absolute destruction of the Bidens.

What was untrue about her testimony?

Bonds did not testify she gave an opening statement.

Thank you, using the verbiage of the OP. Maybe you should have corrected OP.

Now that we have that straight, what part of her opening statement was not accurate?

 

[ColonelAngus]

What did Pam Bondi say that was not accurate?

Anyone?

 

[Snouter]

Pam Bondi did a great job outlining the corruption of the Biden crime family. TDS folks either did not watch her presentation or simply cannot comprehend reality and live in a "bizarro world" to protect themselves from truth.

 

[Oddball]

Alternut.....ROFLMFAO!

 

[occupied]

The left definitely needs to try to discredit her after that absolute destruction of the Bidens.

What was untrue about her testimony?

She's the equivalent of a Fox newsbabe for the defense. If a pretty blonde says it, it's gotta be true.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Alternet.org????

 

[Paul Motter]

She absolutely killed the Bidens, and I hope every liberal was paying attention. Everything she said was factual, and most of us conservatives have known it for a year now. The day of calling the Biden law-breaking "a discredited conspiracy theory" is over!

 

[Lakhota]

As many on social media noted, Bondi refused to join that investigation that led to a $25 million payment from the president, but was only too happy to accept a $25,000 donation from Donald Trump for her re-election campaign, just as she was deciding on whether or not to investigate him.

Bondi rocketed to the number two trending item on Twitter within minutes of speaking.

On social media some are calling it “bizarro world”:


‘Bizarro world’: Trump baffles the internet by sending Pam Bondi to defend him — after she gave a pass to his fake university – Alternet.org

Why does she still have a law license? Why has she not been brought up on ethics violations?

Yes, it was bizarro.

 

[two_iron]

Wow.... Pam is hot, hetero and brilliant.... that's like the Kryptonite trifecta for the marxist Dims....

 

[colfax_m]

What did Pam Bondi say that was not accurate?

Anyone?

She claimed that Biden led the charge to oust Shokin. That’s not true.

 

[Weatherman2020]

What did Pam Bondi say that was not accurate?

Anyone?

She claimed that Biden led the charge to oust Shokin. That’s not true.

You know this how?

 

[colfax_m]

What did Pam Bondi say that was not accurate?

Anyone?

She claimed that Biden led the charge to oust Shokin. That’s not true.

You know this how?

Testimony of George Kent. The idea to oust Shokin came from our diplomats in Kiev.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

The left definitely needs to try to discredit her after that absolute destruction of the Bidens.

What was untrue about her testimony?

Bonds did not testify she gave an opening statement.

Thank you, using the verbiage of the OP. Maybe you should have corrected OP.

Now that we have that straight, what part of her opening statement was not accurate?