Interesting people find me interesting.

[Bombs 4 Obama]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

I support the side that is right even when they're wrong.

That's interesting.

 

[Sallow]

Welcome.

 

[Toro]

I'll have a wild berry wine cooler and some cool ranch Doritos!

You've just gotten somewhat less interesting...

How can you be sure?

If you said "a nice Argentinian malbec" or "a nice blended cab/merlot from the Alexander Valley," or even a "Bud," OK, but wild berry wine coolers? C'mon...

 

[rikules]

well, presumably if you didn't think the side you agree with was right, then you wouldn't support them.

Some people know they're wrong but still keep on arguing.

some people KNOW they are right even though sane and rational people KNOW they are wrong

 

[3DG4life]

I'm new too. Welcome.

 

[Toro]

well, presumably if you didn't think the side you agree with was right, then you wouldn't support them.

Some people know they're wrong but still keep on arguing.

Guilty! I often take the liberal side because I'm just argumentative and obstinate, and the overwhelming tilt here is conservative, and many of them annoy me.

 

[Bombs 4 Obama]

well, presumably if you didn't think the side you agree with was right, then you wouldn't support them.

Some people know they're wrong but still keep on arguing.

Guilty! I often take the liberal side because I'm just argumentative and obstinate, and the overwhelming tilt here is conservative, and many of them annoy me.

I've never annoyed anyone.

 

[eots]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

WTC 7 FIRE OR EXPLOSIVES...

 

[Bombs 4 Obama]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

WTC 7 FIRE OR EXPLOSIVES...

fire

 

[eots]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

WTC 7 FIRE OR EXPLOSIVES...

fire

so much for truth...

 

[Bombs 4 Obama]

WTC 7 FIRE OR EXPLOSIVES...

ybe.com

fire

so much for truth...

It's true.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

WTC 7 FIRE OR EXPLOSIVES...

fire

Imperial forces.

 

[Douger]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

Both sides are brainwashed idiots.
I stand on top of the fence waiting to watch the slaughter commence !
( Sharpton taught me how to rhyme)

 

[Bombs 4 Obama]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

Both sides are brainwashed idiots.
I stand on top of the fence waiting to watch the slaughter commence !
( Sharpton taught me how to rhyme)

both sides of what

 

[Bombs 4 Obama]

 

[Rat in the Hat]

 

[Dr.House]

 

[Mr.Fitnah]

I love a good debate and I always support the side that is right! I guarantee it!

WTC 7 FIRE OR EXPLOSIVES...

fire

Ok not completely crazy
potato

 

[Bombs 4 Obama]

Debunking 9/11 Conspiracy Theories and Controlled Demolition - Osama Bin Laden

Conspiracy theorists like to say "Some Arabs with box cutters couldn't have pulled this off." Let's forget for a minute how racist that statement is. (Arabs can do anything Americans can do) Let's also imagine that the hijackers didn't make it clear they had a bomb as well as the box cutters. The fact is they were the perfect ones to pull this off. Osama went to school for civil engineering at a time when the towers were being built. America thought enough of him to use him to hold off the USSR in Afghanistan. Most of the hijackers have college educations. Some had flight experience and trained with simulators.

An Airliner filled with jet fuel is just a very destructive flying car bomb. Is he really that smart or was the US government not smart enough to realize this? There is evidence some thought about this but failed to act quickly enough to stop it. Telling pilots not to open the cockpit doors under any circumstance and fitting the airliners with better cockpit doors may have stopped the attacks. Just as tellers in a bank are instructed to give money to bank robbers, pilots were under the old rules of letting hijackers do what they want. Any small group could have done what he did. Saying they were a few Arabs from the desert is appealing to the racist in us.

The conspiracy story suggests a few Arabs can't convince you they have a bomb and are dangerous. Remember that most hijackings ended in the past with hijackers making demands and sometimes people being rescued by specialists in hijackings. Now add the hijackers attacking and possibly killing crew members and you can easily conclude the passengers had little reason to risk injury or death. So you don't need any government intervention to carry out that part of the plan. If the passengers of the other airliners knew what was coming I'm sure the plan wouldn't have worked as well. We can draw that conclusion from flight 93.

The conspiracy story also suggests it would be impossible to evade radar without government help. As if there aren't 4,000 airliners in the air at any given time in America. There were hundreds in that area alone. It may have been easier to intercept an airliner with the transponder on but even that isn't easy due to the amount of airliners in the air at the time. One airliner that didn't have anything to do with the attack was thought to be a hijacking and people were planning an intercept. Can you imagine if that plane was brought down by accident? Conspiracy theorists want us to believe its easy to quickly find these flying "needles in the haystacks" when they can't even find photos of iron workers cutting columns at an angle during cleanup. Not even when it's on the same web site and they have all the time in the world to find it.

 

[Rachelj6]

Hello everyone, I love the name of this thread!

Rachel