Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,164
- 1,830
Wasn't Florida supposed to be underwater a few decades ago?
no
Oh that's right we were supposed to have an ice age.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn't Florida supposed to be underwater a few decades ago?
no
Wasn't Florida supposed to be underwater a few decades ago?
no
Oh that's right we were supposed to have an ice age.
Will the acidic oceans eat away the bottom of all our Navy vessels?
Now Frankie Boy, will the acid you have already ingested ever leave you capable of a revelent post?
Will the acidic oceans eat away the bottom of all our Navy vessels?
Now Frankie Boy, will the acid you have already ingested ever leave you capable of a revelent post?[/QUOTE]
Tell us again how CO2 is causing "Ocean acidification" because...
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r9XHwmAojLw]I Love That Story - YouTube[/ame]
see above
Wow, what a monumentally desperate FAIL on your part. I noticed you didn't respond to anything regrading how insurance works. All you can do is dodge the point with talk of child labor and prostitution...in a thread about insurance and global warming. How sad for you. Then you claim a 'win' because 99.9% of flood insurance is government controlled and I claimed "all". Wow, that's quite a reach there pal.
You really suck at debating. I mean REALLY suck.
Wow, what a monumentally desperate FAIL on your part. I noticed you didn't respond to anything regrading how insurance works. All you can do is dodge the point with talk of child labor and prostitution...in a thread about insurance and global warming. How sad for you. Then you claim a 'win' because 99.9% of flood insurance is government controlled and I claimed "all". Wow, that's quite a reach there pal.
You really suck at debating. I mean REALLY suck.
Would you say the US government over-reaches, at insuring homes, on the East Coast and in the Mississippi flood plain, all the way down, to NOLA?
Reflecting on another comment you made in an earlier post:
It depends on ones point of view.[...]I don't put down insurance companies because they earn a profit, I do so because they capitalize on the misfortune of others to earn that profit. My beef is primarily with health insurance, but it carries over into other forms of insurance to a degree.
[...]
Reflecting on another comment you made in an earlier post:
It depends on ones point of view.[...]I don't put down insurance companies because they earn a profit, I do so because they capitalize on the misfortune of others to earn that profit. My beef is primarily with health insurance, but it carries over into other forms of insurance to a degree.
[...]
Indeed is does, which was my point in the first place. I don't agree with your perspective and you apparently don't agree with mine. No big deal, as I stated my dislike of for-profit insurance companies is my personal issue, not one that I am advocating others take up or adhere to.
Reflecting on another comment you made in an earlier post:
It depends on ones point of view.
Indeed is does, which was my point in the first place. I don't agree with your perspective and you apparently don't agree with mine. No big deal, as I stated my dislike of for-profit insurance companies is my personal issue, not one that I am advocating others take up or adhere to.
I understand; I just wanted to inform others who may be on the fence regarding insurance companies. (...)
I feel sorry for folks who are misled about insurance companies; they have about as much chance to succeed in life as a Luddite. because that's what they approximate.
As I said, though I'm bouncing this off your post for context, I'm addressing others.Indeed is does, which was my point in the first place. I don't agree with your perspective and you apparently don't agree with mine. No big deal, as I stated my dislike of for-profit insurance companies is my personal issue, not one that I am advocating others take up or adhere to.
I understand; I just wanted to inform others who may be on the fence regarding insurance companies. (...)
I feel sorry for folks who are misled about insurance companies; they have about as much chance to succeed in life as a Luddite. because that's what they approximate.
All you argue for is ability to procure third party bonding and insurance, I see no compelling argument demonstrating the superiority of private, for-profit insurance vs. private non-profit insurance or even public insurance institutions
Again, I am not interested in convincing others to my point of view with regards to for-profit insurance providers, nor am I interested in slinging inapt and inaccurate slurs against those who feel differently than I do about this issue.
If you would like to discuss the issue further out of some personal desire to better understand my issues and choices, I would be happy to engage in that discussion, if your goal is to generate ad hom and well-poisoning fallacies, I'm generally uninterested.
Heres the 2012 poll................Dead Last FTMFL.............in fact, in 2012, it doesnt even make the list!!!!
Again, citing a poll from April doesn't trump a poll July
How's your driving, sucksassandballs? Pretty good in traffic?