Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Honestly, I sit here every day laughing that you made it to adulthood. Usually, Darwin takes care of people like you to prevent the retarded gene from being passed on...Otherwise, I am sitting here laughing at the irony of you self-destructing your own topic...
No, dumbshit. I am asking you to prove your premise that progressives say no one has ever stopped a crime with a gun.Thread fail? Bwahahahaha! Now G-String is denying video.Thread fail.
Pseudocons like to drink Kool-Aid laced with arsenic. Here's a link showing that arsenic is very bad for you: Arsenic poisoning. Boy, did I just spank those pseudocons, or what? . My argument is indisputable!
I "built" my topic on the facts. I backed it up with video. As far as your declaration demanding "proof" - how do you want me to prove lies? Progressives idiots say shit like that all the time. How the fuck am I supposed to "prove" something which isn't true?No, dumbshit. I am asking you to prove your premise that progressives say no one has ever stopped a crime with a gun. You built your topic on a lie. And made yourself the fool.Thread fail? Bwahahahaha! Now G-String is denying video.Thread fail.
I "built" my topic on the facts.No, dumbshit. I am asking you to prove your premise that progressives say no one has ever stopped a crime with a gun. You built your topic on a lie. And made yourself the fool.Thread fail? Bwahahahaha! Now G-String is denying video.Thread fail.
Please take a course in critical thinking. And leave the defense of the Second Amendment to the grown ups. You are hurting the cause.Pseudocons like to drink Kool-Aid laced with arsenic. Here's a link showing that arsenic is very bad for you: Arsenic poisoning. Boy, did I just spank those pseudocons, or what? . My argument is indisputable!
In other words... G-String can't dispute the facts so he'll throw a temp tantrum like a small child.
You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
Many an ignorant progressive has. I guess since you can't cry "racist" anymore with the same effect you're turning to "straw man" now?Your logical fallacy is a strawman
You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
To wit, "They love to say that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime."
That is a misrepresentation of the gun control argument. They do not make that claim.
Ah yes...the 'ole "critical thinking". A buzzword favorite among progressives. I love when progressives throw around words that they don't even understand. I've got $10 right now that G-Sting tries to somehow work the progressive buzzword "infrastructure" into the thread next.Please take a course in critical thinking. And leave the defense of the Second Amendment to the grown ups. You are hurting the cause.
Progressives love their false narratives about firearms. They love to say that an armed citizen has "never" stopped a crime (when in fact an armed citizens prevents a crime every single day in America). They love to say that people who arm themselves are "cowards" who would actually panic and cower in the face of an actual situation requiring the use of deadly force.
Well...the video doesn't lie. Here is a woman - a woman - taking on three armed individuals (two of which are definitely men). She doesn't cowar. She doesn't panic. She presses forward with her firearm - driving the intruders out (and killing one in the process). Even when she has the opportunity to lock the door, she opens it and continues to fire outside. It's the dirt-bag criminals who duck and run like scared little sissies.
This one video defeats all of the progressives favorite false narratives. Progressives want to outlaw firearms because they want to increase their war on women. This woman refused to be a victim. By herself she took on three armed intruders and she won for one reason and one reason only - she was armed. God Bless the 2nd Amendment.
Armed intruders kicked in the door. What they found was a woman opening fire.
Progressives love their false narratives about firearms. They love to say that an armed citizen has "never" stopped a crime (when in fact an armed citizens prevents a crime every single day in America). They love to say that people who arm themselves are "cowards" who would actually panic and cower in the face of an actual situation requiring the use of deadly force.
Well...the video doesn't lie. Here is a woman - a woman - taking on three armed individuals (two of which are definitely men). She doesn't cowar. She doesn't panic. She presses forward with her firearm - driving the intruders out (and killing one in the process). Even when she has the opportunity to lock the door, she opens it and continues to fire outside. It's the dirt-bag criminals who duck and run like scared little sissies.
This one video defeats all of the progressives favorite false narratives. Progressives want to outlaw firearms because they want to increase their war on women. This woman refused to be a victim. By herself she took on three armed intruders and she won for one reason and one reason only - she was armed. God Bless the 2nd Amendment.
Armed intruders kicked in the door. What they found was a woman opening fire.
Can you name any Progressives of note who have stated that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime?
It proves no such thing.
You don't know it happens every day.
The number does matter.
The 2A has nothing to do with crime.
You are awful at this.
LoneLaugher , just why do you think the Second Amendment was written?
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
Progressives love their false narratives about firearms. They love to say that an armed citizen has "never" stopped a crime (when in fact an armed citizens prevents a crime every single day in America). They love to say that people who arm themselves are "cowards" who would actually panic and cower in the face of an actual situation requiring the use of deadly force.
Well...the video doesn't lie. Here is a woman - a woman - taking on three armed individuals (two of which are definitely men). She doesn't cowar. She doesn't panic. She presses forward with her firearm - driving the intruders out (and killing one in the process). Even when she has the opportunity to lock the door, she opens it and continues to fire outside. It's the dirt-bag criminals who duck and run like scared little sissies.
This one video defeats all of the progressives favorite false narratives. Progressives want to outlaw firearms because they want to increase their war on women. This woman refused to be a victim. By herself she took on three armed intruders and she won for one reason and one reason only - she was armed. God Bless the 2nd Amendment.
Armed intruders kicked in the door. What they found was a woman opening fire.
Can you name any Progressives of note who have stated that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime?
Many an ignorant progressive has.Your logical fallacy is a strawman
You misrepresented someone's argument to make it easier to attack.
To wit, "They love to say that an armed citizen has never stopped a crime."
That is a misrepresentation of the gun control argument. They do not make that claim.
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
I have it tattooed on my ass, so I am very aware what it means... I just love having you liberal assholes repeat it as often as I can...