There were 'naughty girls' even in the 1950's... they just did not have the internet, to expose themselves.In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?
I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?
All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.
Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?
Any woman that is having sex with a guy merely for their money, or for monetary items only, and not for a relationship or even for the enjoyment of sex, are probably close to the same as prostitutes....
You really don't want to deal with that kind of woman and should have no envy of them.... it's a sad life to live when money is more important than self respect or a meaningful, loving, relationship.
Last edited: