In Pennsylvania, a certified public accountant is claiming that the number of ballots is 202,377 bigger than the number of people who actually voted

[Dr Grump]

In Not-giveafuckistan, 127 lawmakers found evidence the Earth was flat. Zero fucks were given.

Poor coward.

Haven't you got some neocon whackadoodle you have to get on your knees for?

 

[Claudette]

In Not-giveafuckistan, 127 lawmakers found evidence the Earth was flat. Zero fucks were given.

We know, you don't care that the election was stolen.

View attachment 434872

No reason to cry I'm not a Rumpist. I'm also not a partisan hack. ANYONE with an ounce of integrity knows what happened.

Oh they know. If Biden were Trump they would be screaming election fraud long and loud and they know it. I'd be screaming right beside them.

 

[Mac1958]

I don't know if this claim is true of false.

It doesn't matter.

He just gained himself a shitload of Trumpster tax returns, right before tax time. Excellent marketing.

 

[Billiejeens]

Good for you.

I was just pointing out to the morons that if our elections are so bad, why do Republicans do so well? ...

Because we are a right center country.
There was a small red wave -instead of the big blue wave that was predicted.
Trump picked up votes among, AA, Hispanic, Asians, and Jewish people.

He only didn't do well in the 6 counties that stopped counting in the middle of the night and then committed fraud.

 

[Billiejeens]

In Not-giveafuckistan, 127 lawmakers found evidence the Earth was flat. Zero fucks were given.

Poor coward.

Haven't you got some neocon whackadoodle you have to get on your knees for?

I'd come knock you to your knees if you weren't such a coward.

 

[Billiejeens]

The people that should be looking into the election know what they will find and it scares them...they know Joe didn't win...they know it the judges know it and the dems know it....its a sad day in America....

What will scare them is how batshit insane the Republican Party has become.

View attachment 434855

How badly our election system has been destroyed....how we have no idea how long this has been going on....

You didn' complain in 2016.

Same system.

QUOTE="otto105, post: 26220038, member: 66286"]

The people that should be looking into the election know what they will find and it scares them...they know Joe didn't win...they know it the judges know it and the dems know it....its a sad day in America....

What will scare them is how batshit insane the Republican Party has become.

View attachment 434855

How badly our election system has been destroyed....how we have no idea how long this has been going on....

You didn' complain in 2016.

Same system.

It's not
If you don't know that you should just
Log the fuck off and stop embarrassing yourself.

What was different?
[/QUOTE]

You are of the understanding that nothing was different?

People showed up at the polls with the Proper ID (where required) during early voting or on election day, the small percentage of people that request and receive absentee ballots filled them out as normal, and returned them, and they were able to determine the winner on election night as normal.

That is your understanding?

 

[Claudette]

The people that should be looking into the election know what they will find and it scares them...they know Joe didn't win...they know it the judges know it and the dems know it....its a sad day in America....

What will scare them is how batshit insane the Republican Party has become.

View attachment 434855

How badly our election system has been destroyed....how we have no idea how long this has been going on....

You didn' complain in 2016.

Same system.

QUOTE="otto105, post: 26220038, member: 66286"]

The people that should be looking into the election know what they will find and it scares them...they know Joe didn't win...they know it the judges know it and the dems know it....its a sad day in America....

What will scare them is how batshit insane the Republican Party has become.

View attachment 434855

How badly our election system has been destroyed....how we have no idea how long this has been going on....

You didn' complain in 2016.

Same system.

It's not
If you don't know that you should just
Log the fuck off and stop embarrassing yourself.

What was different?

You are of the understanding that nothing was different?

People showed up at the polls with the Proper ID (where required) during early voting or on election day, the small percentage of people that request and receive absentee ballots filled them out as normal, and returned them, and they were able to determine the winner on election night as normal.

That is your understanding?
[/QUOTE]

Gee, Guess he forgot about all the ballots that showed up in the middle of the night. He also forgot about the ballots that weren't supposed to be counted for one reason or another. He also forgot about the Dominion machine taking 6,000 Trump votes and giving them to Biden. Now they caught that one. How many didn't they catch. He'd like to forget all the evidence out there and you can bet if Biden were Trump he'd be screaming election fraud long and loud.

 

[Billiejeens]

The people that should be looking into the election know what they will find and it scares them...they know Joe didn't win...they know it the judges know it and the dems know it....its a sad day in America....

What will scare them is how batshit insane the Republican Party has become.

View attachment 434855

How badly our election system has been destroyed....how we have no idea how long this has been going on....

You didn' complain in 2016.

Same system.

QUOTE="otto105, post: 26220038, member: 66286"]

The people that should be looking into the election know what they will find and it scares them...they know Joe didn't win...they know it the judges know it and the dems know it....its a sad day in America....

What will scare them is how batshit insane the Republican Party has become.

View attachment 434855

How badly our election system has been destroyed....how we have no idea how long this has been going on....

You didn' complain in 2016.

Same system.

It's not
If you don't know that you should just
Log the fuck off and stop embarrassing yourself.

What was different?

You are of the understanding that nothing was different?

People showed up at the polls with the Proper ID (where required) during early voting or on election day, the small percentage of people that request and receive absentee ballots filled them out as normal, and returned them, and they were able to determine the winner on election night as normal.

That is your understanding?

Gee, Guess he forgot about all the ballots that showed up in the middle of the night. He also forgot about the ballots that weren't supposed to be counted for one reason or another. He also forgot about the Dominion machine taking 6,000 Trump votes and giving them to Biden. Now they caught that one. How many didn't they catch. He'd like to forget all the evidence out there and you can bet if Biden were Trump he'd be screaming election fraud long and loud.
[/QUOTE]


Weird how that happens, yes?

In the cult of the bubble,
They have no idea that any of that happened.

 

[candycorn]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

 

[Billiejeens]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

 

[Claudette]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

That it did and there is more than enough proof to back it up.

You can bet Cornholio would be screaming election fraud at the top of her lungs if Biden were Trump. And she would be right to do so.

 

[candycorn]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

You're alleging thousands of felonies in 6 states, multiple jurisdictions, dozens of different elected officials in each.

Total number of arrests? Zero.

Explain.

 

[candycorn]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

That it did and there is more than enough proof to back it up.

You can bet Cornholio would be screaming election fraud at the top of her lungs if Biden were Trump. And she would be right to do so.

Name someone who committed voter fraud in those six states.

 

[Billiejeens]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

You're alleging thousands of felonies in 6 states, multiple jurisdictions, dozens of different elected officials in each.

Total number of arrests? Zero.

Explain.

Total number of cases the courts have looked into
Zero
Explain that.

 

[Billiejeens]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

That it did and there is more than enough proof to back it up.

You can bet Cornholio would be screaming election fraud at the top of her lungs if Biden were Trump. And she would be right to do so.

Name someone who committed voter fraud in those six states.

Dominion

 

[22lcidw]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

That it did and there is more than enough proof to back it up.

You can bet Cornholio would be screaming election fraud at the top of her lungs if Biden were Trump. And she would be right to do so.

Name someone who committed voter fraud in those six states.

You guys run commercials for people with sexual diseases to keep doing the things that causes lifetime and expensive sexual diseases while prescribing medications for it that do not cure it but keep the advanced systems at bay. So why making questions of naming people who commit voter fraud must be named by a nation that now has 95% of the media and entertainers firmly in the Prog Socialist column going to do or prove by the common citizen? Stacey Abrams is corrupted. She is not qualified to clean toilets but is fronted by globalist policies to help and is succeeding in lowering our IQ quotient as statists more and more usurp great visionaries that produce true wealth and advancements.

 

[Crepitus]

I don't know if this claim is true of false.

I would be cool if the Washington Post had its own CPA's investigate this, to either debunk it, or confirm it.



DOS responds to Republican lawmakers' claim of election numbers discrepancy

PA Republican lawmakers: Analysis finds presidential election numbers don’t add up

December 28, 2020

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WJAC) — A group of Republican lawmakers say they’ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they’ve found “troubling” discrepancies.

According to State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon), 17 lawmakers sponsored and participated in the analysis.

Ryan, who is a certified public accountant, says they discovered discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election which is making them question how the results could have been certified by Gov. Tom Wolf and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar.

According to Ryan, the analysis compared official county election results to the total number of voters who voted Nov. 3, as rec

Ryan says they found that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicated that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted.

Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates, according to Ryan.

He says the difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to a discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

Pennsylvania’s election results were certified Nov. 24 and Gov. Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors stating that Biden received 80,555 more votes than Trump.

The group of lawmakers released the following joint statement:

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

“However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon) indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in the analysis were himself and Reps. Russ Diamond (R-Lebanon), Dave Zimmerman (R-Lancaster), Barb Gleim (R-Cumberland), Stephanie Borowicz (R-Centre/Clinton), Dan Moul (R-Adams), Paul Schemel (R-Franklin), Dawn Keefer (R-York/Cumberland), Eric Nelson (R-Westmoreland), Mike Jones (R-York), Rob Kauffman (R-Franklin), David Maloney (R-Berks), David Rowe (R-Snyder/Union), Kathy Rapp (R-Warren/Crawford/Forest), Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler), Jim Cox (R-Berks/Lancaster) and Brett Miller (R-Lancaster).

The Pennsylvania Department of State released the following statement in response to the Republicans’ claims:

“In today’s release Rep. Ryan and others rehash, with the same lack of evidence and the same absence of supporting documentation, repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories regarding the November 3 election. State and federal judges have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting.

“Now, the legislators have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge.

“For instance, it is quite common to have significant “undervotes” for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn’t a U.S. Senate race on the ballot. In 2000, Sen. Santorum received 200,000 more votes than President Bush, but the US Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.

“We are unclear as to what data the legislators used for this most recent “analysis.” But the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories. At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters. The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary.

“This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis.

“To put it simply, this so-called analysis was based on incomplete data.”

A CPA?

Not an elections specialist?

Oh, they all said there was no fraud, didn't they. My bad.

 

[Billiejeens]

I don't know if this claim is true of false.

I would be cool if the Washington Post had its own CPA's investigate this, to either debunk it, or confirm it.



DOS responds to Republican lawmakers' claim of election numbers discrepancy

PA Republican lawmakers: Analysis finds presidential election numbers don’t add up

December 28, 2020

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WJAC) — A group of Republican lawmakers say they’ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they’ve found “troubling” discrepancies.

According to State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon), 17 lawmakers sponsored and participated in the analysis.

Ryan, who is a certified public accountant, says they discovered discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election which is making them question how the results could have been certified by Gov. Tom Wolf and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar.

According to Ryan, the analysis compared official county election results to the total number of voters who voted Nov. 3, as rec

Ryan says they found that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicated that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted.

Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates, according to Ryan.

He says the difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to a discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

Pennsylvania’s election results were certified Nov. 24 and Gov. Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors stating that Biden received 80,555 more votes than Trump.

The group of lawmakers released the following joint statement:

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

“However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon) indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in the analysis were himself and Reps. Russ Diamond (R-Lebanon), Dave Zimmerman (R-Lancaster), Barb Gleim (R-Cumberland), Stephanie Borowicz (R-Centre/Clinton), Dan Moul (R-Adams), Paul Schemel (R-Franklin), Dawn Keefer (R-York/Cumberland), Eric Nelson (R-Westmoreland), Mike Jones (R-York), Rob Kauffman (R-Franklin), David Maloney (R-Berks), David Rowe (R-Snyder/Union), Kathy Rapp (R-Warren/Crawford/Forest), Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler), Jim Cox (R-Berks/Lancaster) and Brett Miller (R-Lancaster).

The Pennsylvania Department of State released the following statement in response to the Republicans’ claims:

“In today’s release Rep. Ryan and others rehash, with the same lack of evidence and the same absence of supporting documentation, repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories regarding the November 3 election. State and federal judges have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting.

“Now, the legislators have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge.

“For instance, it is quite common to have significant “undervotes” for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn’t a U.S. Senate race on the ballot. In 2000, Sen. Santorum received 200,000 more votes than President Bush, but the US Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.

“We are unclear as to what data the legislators used for this most recent “analysis.” But the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories. At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters. The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary.

“This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis.

“To put it simply, this so-called analysis was based on incomplete data.”

A CPA?

Not an elections specialist?

Oh, they all said there was no fraud, didn't they. My bad.

Name them.

 

[Crepitus]

I don't know if this claim is true of false.

I would be cool if the Washington Post had its own CPA's investigate this, to either debunk it, or confirm it.



DOS responds to Republican lawmakers' claim of election numbers discrepancy

PA Republican lawmakers: Analysis finds presidential election numbers don’t add up

December 28, 2020

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WJAC) — A group of Republican lawmakers say they’ve performed an extensive analysis of election day data and they’ve found “troubling” discrepancies.

According to State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon), 17 lawmakers sponsored and participated in the analysis.

Ryan, who is a certified public accountant, says they discovered discrepancies between the numbers of total votes counted and total number of voters who voted in the 2020 General Election which is making them question how the results could have been certified by Gov. Tom Wolf and Secretary of the Commonwealth Kathy Boockvar.

According to Ryan, the analysis compared official county election results to the total number of voters who voted Nov. 3, as rec

Ryan says they found that 6,962,607 total ballots were reported as being cast, while DoS/SURE system records indicated that only 6,760,230 total voters actually voted.

Among the 6,962,607 total ballots cast, 6,931,060 total votes were counted in the presidential race, including all three candidates on the ballot and write-in candidates, according to Ryan.

He says the difference of 202,377 more votes cast than voters voting, together with the 31,547 over- and under-votes in the presidential race, adds up to a discrepancy of 170,830 votes, which is more than twice the reported statewide difference between Donald Trump and Joe Biden.

Pennsylvania’s election results were certified Nov. 24 and Gov. Wolf issued a certificate of ascertainment of presidential electors stating that Biden received 80,555 more votes than Trump.

The group of lawmakers released the following joint statement:

“We were already concerned with the actions of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, the Executive branch, and election officials in certain counties contravening and undermining the Pennsylvania Election Code by eliminating signature verification, postmarks, and due dates while allowing the proliferation of drop boxes with questionable security measures and the unauthorized curing of ballots, as well as the questionable treatment of poll watchers, all of which created wholesale opportunities for irregularities in the 2020 presidential election.”

“However, we are now seeing discrepancies on the retail level which raise even more troubling questions regarding irregularities in the election returns. These findings call into question the accuracy of the SURE system, consistency in the application of the Pennsylvania Election Code from county to county, and the competency of those charged with oversight of elections in our Commonwealth.

“These numbers just don’t add up, and the alleged certification of Pennsylvania’s presidential election results was absolutely premature, unconfirmed, and in error.”

State Rep. Frank Ryan (R-Lebanon) indicated that state legislators sponsoring and participating in the analysis were himself and Reps. Russ Diamond (R-Lebanon), Dave Zimmerman (R-Lancaster), Barb Gleim (R-Cumberland), Stephanie Borowicz (R-Centre/Clinton), Dan Moul (R-Adams), Paul Schemel (R-Franklin), Dawn Keefer (R-York/Cumberland), Eric Nelson (R-Westmoreland), Mike Jones (R-York), Rob Kauffman (R-Franklin), David Maloney (R-Berks), David Rowe (R-Snyder/Union), Kathy Rapp (R-Warren/Crawford/Forest), Daryl Metcalfe (R-Butler), Jim Cox (R-Berks/Lancaster) and Brett Miller (R-Lancaster).

The Pennsylvania Department of State released the following statement in response to the Republicans’ claims:

“In today’s release Rep. Ryan and others rehash, with the same lack of evidence and the same absence of supporting documentation, repeatedly debunked conspiracy theories regarding the November 3 election. State and federal judges have sifted through hundreds of pages of unsubstantiated and false allegations and found no evidence of fraud or illegal voting.

“Now, the legislators have given us another perfect example of the dangers of uninformed, lay analysis combined with a basic lack of election administration knowledge.

“For instance, it is quite common to have significant “undervotes” for down-ballot races in a presidential election, particularly when there isn’t a U.S. Senate race on the ballot. In 2000, Sen. Santorum received 200,000 more votes than President Bush, but the US Senate race still had more than 100,000 fewer votes than the presidential race.

“We are unclear as to what data the legislators used for this most recent “analysis.” But the only way to determine the number of voters who voted in November from the SURE system is through the vote histories. At this time, there are still a few counties that have not completed uploading their vote histories to the SURE system. These counties, which include Philadelphia, Allegheny, Butler and Cambria, would account for a significant number of voters. The numbers certified by the counties, not the uploading of voter histories into the SURE system, determines the ultimate certification of an election by the secretary.

“This obvious misinformation put forth by Rep. Ryan and others is the hallmark of so many of the claims made about this year’s presidential election. When exposed to even the simplest examination, courts at every level have found these and similar conspiratorial claims to be wholly without basis.

“To put it simply, this so-called analysis was based on incomplete data.”

A CPA?

Not an elections specialist?

Oh, they all said there was no fraud, didn't they. My bad.

Name them.

What, all of them?

 

[candycorn]

There was no sizable election fraud in PA, NV, AZ, MI, WI, or GA.

The blob lost.

Factually false

It may not be fixed, but it happened.
Its not in dispute.

You're alleging thousands of felonies in 6 states, multiple jurisdictions, dozens of different elected officials in each.

Total number of arrests? Zero.

Explain.

Total number of cases the courts have looked into
Zero
Explain that.

Here is what a Pennsylvania judge said.

Trump Is Being Laughed Out of Court by His Own Judicial Appointees

As multiple judges rebuff Trump’s toothless lawsuits, GOP lawmakers are still overwhelmingly unwilling to acknowledge Biden’s victory.

www.vanityfair.com

You can use it for all six contested states. They all pretty much ruled the same thing; there was no evidence to look into; only baseless allegations.

Now, again, stop obfuscating and tell us why there are no arrests for all of these alleged felonies.