Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
Give me an example of Obama compromising, in the end, on something. I'm just curious what your examples of compromise are and if I agree.
Yep, the media....always tossing softballs to the Prez (as long as it's a democrat)
Mitt Romney's biggest problem is not his message, his wealth, his running mate, or his record. His biggest problem is a press which is unceasingly hostile to him because they are totally--totally--in the tank for Obama.
September 27, 2012
The Great 2012 "conservative"-IMPLOSION!!
"As I said, not the election anyone was expecting but a happy surprise for some, and a nasty shock for others."
I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
Give me an example of Obama compromising, in the end, on something. I'm just curious what your examples of compromise are and if I agree.
The stimulus package was much smaller than Obama and the Treasury Dept. originally wanted because of Republican opposition. The final package was a compromise. Also, health care reform evolved to closely resemble the one Romney approved of as governor. Originally, it had a public option.
Also, Obama's debt reduction/jobs proposal of last year was greatly changed because of GOP opposition; negotiation allowed the tax cuts for rich folks (Bush's "temporary" tax reduction) to continue so that he could extend unemployment benefits.
Obama compromised with the GOP far, far too much in his first three years. In my opinion, that is, and it cost him politically in terms of his base.
I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
I'm not the biggest Romney fan, but he has my vote. His shit definately smells better than our marxist-in-chief.
Mitt Romney's biggest problem is not his message, his wealth, his running mate, or his record. His biggest problem is a press which is unceasingly hostile to him because they are totally--totally--in the tank for Obama.
This is what you sound like:
If we shove something in your mouth will that make you feel better?
While its true that it is whining at least he is whining about something that is factual and obvious.
As I see it obamaturd has never been fit to govern lead or give good advice. What has obamaturd done to be qualified? Nothing!!!!!!I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
You ever wonder why we call them the media instead of journalist? It's very simple, journalism in America is dead, all we have now, with very few exceptions, are opinionist.
As I see it obamaturd has never been fit to govern lead or give good advice. What has obamaturd done to be qualified? Nothing!!!!!!I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
Yep, the media....always tossing softballs to the Prez (as long as it's a democrat)
yes... the media told romney to say he doesn't give a rats patoot about 47% of the country... twisted his little arm, in fact.... check.
forced him to blow even a soft ball trip to london... check...
forced him to mess up his response to the embassy kililngs... check.
i've never seen so many excuses made for one guy since...well, since bush broke the economy.
Jillian everytime I crush your answer, you never respond.....
First the response to London, Romney was correct....
London's Olympic security headache - CNN.com
Second about the 47% where did he say he didnt give a rats ass about them? He said it was a waste of time trying to get their votes...not the same thing
Embassy killings....what gaffe did Romney make?
Do you believe it was because of a youtube video? really?
Mitt Romney's biggest problem is not his message, his wealth, his running mate, or his record. His biggest problem is a press which is unceasingly hostile to him because they are totally--totally--in the tank for Obama. So Obama lies about the attack on the American consulate in Libya, and they let him get away with it. Romney says one thing that might differ from what he said 25 years ago and the press is all over him.
He has an excellent record as an executive and has put together an excellent team of advisors. This alone makes him far more qualified than Obama.
I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
Obama has never compromised. On anything. Even within his own party he's pretty much a my way or the highway guy. You are totally out of touch if you think Obama has a better record on working with the other side than Romney. And your comments about Bush are bullshit too.
I disagree--needless to say. That's why we have elections.
As I see it, Obama is fit to govern whereas Romney is not. Obama seems to understand that successful governance means compromise and negotiation (he is consequently villified by the right wing for being a "socialist," and by the left for being a "corporatist"). Romney does not understand that at all; in fact, he has painted himself as a rigid right wing extremist ideologue this year. Even if this is only to get the cracker vote, though, it is still disingenuous and cheap.
I see no redeeming qualities in Mitt Romney at all. He seems dull-witted, unaware of the real world of work and challenges, and he has nefarious motivations; that is--
(1) Typical of rich boys, he feels compelled to outdo his domineering and successful father, and
(2) He is a member of a little cult called the Mormon Church. He is working on their behalf.
I would re-elect George W. Bush sooner than I would vote for Romney. At least Bush was an honest man; Romney is a shiester.
Obama has never compromised. On anything. Even within his own party he's pretty much a my way or the highway guy. You are totally out of touch if you think Obama has a better record on working with the other side than Romney. And your comments about Bush are bullshit too.
wow this is some partisan bullshit.....So today its Obama is a dictator. Tomorrow it will be he can't get anything done.
