Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by Liberty, Sep 11, 2011.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PL6BfAvNTm0]911GATE: Lobby-Basement Mega Proof - YouTube[/ame]
for me to watch such a video, it must show at least a GIGA proof.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CNWkTyT6r3A]WTC 7 EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY - YouTube[/ame]
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6k39HDnf0g]9/11 WTC 7 Eyewitness - Saw A Big Flash Then The Building Came Down WPIX 5:55pm - YouTube[/ame]
Being that an event like this, that is, two fuel-laden wide bodied jets have NEVER stuck modern skyscrapers before, I don't think ANYONE knows for sure what the physics of such an event are. Even the engineers that designed the building. Even bin Laden was surprised. Perhaps, it's likely that all the reports of "bombs going off"' are misunderstood phenomena related to the impact/collapse of the structure itself? I think THAT is more likely the case. People like the idea of conspiracies and hidden plots being revealed. I think that, years from now, facts will show that the two towers collapsed BECAUSE of the planes hitting them, it was NOT an controlled implosion.
WTC 1&2 both collapsed from a unique design that was designed to withstand 707's flying into them. While I would like to think the design was right I'm thinking that there were some things they overlooked. And, of course, there is the fact that they were much larger jets with bigger fuel loads.
There have been NO other buildings in the world built like the twin towers. I think it was a unique set of circumstances that brought both down. NOT the crap from the idiot crowd such as Jones, Rimjob, Eots, among others, believe.
bullshit...and what about wtc 7
WOW!! Is bullshit one of those answers you always say is not backed up? And I didn't say ANYTHING about your deflection to WTC7, asswipe. Your debating skills are almost as bad as Rimjob's. Loser.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hozGmG3YxJM]Frank DeMartini Says WTC Could Sustain Multiple Impacts - YouTube[/ame]
Separate names with a comma.