If You Weren't Certain Before.....

[pknopp]

Like with Trump's corporate farm give aways?

How about 'like' with Newsom's 'doctors write prescriptions for housing'?

Is that a yes or no?

How about 'like' with Newsom's 'doctors write prescriptions for housing'?


While the issue brought you slithering in to voluntarily subscribe to the thread, you appear insistent on changing the issue.

Of course, I won't allow you to do so......that's why I am a much better teacher than those you've had in government school.

Had more been like me, you might actually have learned something.



Coulter put it this way:

Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…



Now, if the OP wounded you, perhaps the subject of Liberal insanity hits too close to home....you may slither away.
No one will be deprived of any insight you might have provided....as there is none.

The topic was giving away other people's money for votes.

It's OK when Trump does it like with the corporate farms?

The topic is liberal insanity. The OP pretty much nailed it.

Yet it seems you and her accept the same things out of Trump.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

....we have proof about the rumor that Democrats/Liberals are insane.


1. Government doesn't earn any money. It taxes folks who earn money, to get the money to give it away so as to buy votes.

2. Missing the point of where their money comes from, capitalism, insane politicians do everything possible to steal the money, and the ability to make more money, from earners....via theft called socialism.




3. But....they are inventive in their insanity.
Today, California 'chief insanity officer' has this amazing new proposal:

"Far-left California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom said on Wednesday that he believes medical doctors should be able to prescribe people housing in the same manner that they prescribe medication to people who are sick.

“Health care and housing can no longer be divorced. After all, what’s more fundamental to a person’s well-being than a roof over their head?” Newsom said during his State of the State address. “Doctors should be able to write prescriptions for housing the same way they do for insulin or antibiotics.”
Democrat Gov Gavin Newsom: Doctors Should Be Able To Prescribe Housing Like Medication

Some gov't functions - and therefore taxes - are necessary and constitutionally justified. Our gov't has strayed far from the FF's intent.

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton

We need a flat tax, where as poor working people aren't penalized, and middle class working people aren't penalized, and the wealthy aren't penalized when paying taxes.

Then it comes down to the choices that each individual makes in order to get ahead in life.

No one should be penalized by a tax code whether they are rich or poor in life. The government doesn't need to be in the business of choosing winners and losers in life. It should be neutral and helpful in everything it does for everyone.

The tax codes are supposed to be wrote in ways in which help all, but not so sure if helping or hurting people with all the adds and loop holes written into the codes these days. Exploitation of the codes are probably rampant these days, because people don't seem to be doing as well as they should be, and alot of complaining is going on every election about it all. Time for real solutions.

The government shouldn't be in business to REGULATE what I want to do with my life, as it is my "CHOICE" what I do. Now if I am like a stupid liberal and walk down a busy street in protest and get my liberal dumb ass run over, then I should be responsible for my liberal stupid actions, not the driver, the city, the state, or the country.. Being liberal they never take responsibility for their actions, just like with abortion, they are quick to murder a baby because they had "CHOSEN" unwisely...

 

[beagle9]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Wasn't talking about law abiding citizen's guns.

If you haven't been convicted of anything there is no way to determine that. That's also how "red flag" laws work.

You support them, obviously, right?

If you haven't been convicted of anything, then you are law abiding. We aren't in the assumption business, but we can be in the preventive business to a certain degree. If a person is showing proof of a will to do violent thing's to other innocent people, and to do it with any weapon of choice, be it with a knife, vehicle, gun or whatever, and we know this by threats the person is making, then yes we should be pro-active in trying to thwart that person from being able to commit or carry out such threats being made after making them.

It depends on who is writing the laws, and who they are writing them for these days, in which determines whether or not the intent behind the laws are good or bad. Laws written for political reason's are generally going to be bad, because they could be written in order to obtain an outcome that has nothing to do with actual justice being sought after in the law. People have got to be smart enough to know the difference's or we won't have a functioning republic anymore.

 

[beagle9]

....we have proof about the rumor that Democrats/Liberals are insane.


1. Government doesn't earn any money. It taxes folks who earn money, to get the money to give it away so as to buy votes.

2. Missing the point of where their money comes from, capitalism, insane politicians do everything possible to steal the money, and the ability to make more money, from earners....via theft called socialism.




3. But....they are inventive in their insanity.
Today, California 'chief insanity officer' has this amazing new proposal:

"Far-left California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom said on Wednesday that he believes medical doctors should be able to prescribe people housing in the same manner that they prescribe medication to people who are sick.

“Health care and housing can no longer be divorced. After all, what’s more fundamental to a person’s well-being than a roof over their head?” Newsom said during his State of the State address. “Doctors should be able to write prescriptions for housing the same way they do for insulin or antibiotics.”
Democrat Gov Gavin Newsom: Doctors Should Be Able To Prescribe Housing Like Medication

Some gov't functions - and therefore taxes - are necessary and constitutionally justified. Our gov't has strayed far from the FF's intent.

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton

We need a flat tax, where as poor working people aren't penalized, and middle class working people aren't penalized, and the wealthy aren't penalized when paying taxes.

Then it comes down to the choices that each individual makes in order to get ahead in life.

No one should be penalized by a tax code whether they are rich or poor in life. The government doesn't need to be in the business of choosing winners and losers in life. It should be neutral and helpful in everything it does for everyone.

The tax codes are supposed to be wrote in ways in which help all, but not so sure if helping or hurting people with all the adds and loop holes written into the codes these days. Exploitation of the codes are probably rampant these days, because people don't seem to be doing as well as they should be, and alot of complaining is going on every election about it all. Time for real solutions.

The government shouldn't be in business to REGULATE what I want to do with my life, as it is my "CHOICE" what I do. Now if I am like a stupid liberal and walk down a busy street in protest and get my liberal dumb ass run over, then I should be responsible for my liberal stupid actions, not the driver, the city, the state, or the country.. Being liberal they never take responsibility for their actions, just like with abortion, they are quick to murder a baby because they had "CHOSEN" unwisely...

Yes, everything in degree's, where as we have to be protected from that drunk driver who decides to get in that vehicle turning it into a killing machine, and laws attempt to regulate drinking and driving to some degree. Doesn't stop it all together, but I would say that it helps. Because we love freedom, we don't ban things completely, otherwise for a person that drinks responsibly or has any other hobby he or she likes doing responsibly, then we condone and protect their right to do it. We don't judge all for the actions of a few in America, and that's what out freedoms are grounded in.

The left or liberals want to punish all for the actions of a few, thus leading this nation into a Nazi hell if we allow it to keep heading in that direction as a people who are gullable enough to let it go down that road. Freedom ain't easy, and keeping our freedom is tough these days. Being smart in recognizing what's going on is the key. Politics is leading this nation astray, because in politics these days we see many abuses taking place. Having leaders with ill intent isn't good, and this nation must continue to vote in freedom loving leadership whom don't have ill intent for us and our freedom loving nation.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

....we have proof about the rumor that Democrats/Liberals are insane.


1. Government doesn't earn any money. It taxes folks who earn money, to get the money to give it away so as to buy votes.

2. Missing the point of where their money comes from, capitalism, insane politicians do everything possible to steal the money, and the ability to make more money, from earners....via theft called socialism.




3. But....they are inventive in their insanity.
Today, California 'chief insanity officer' has this amazing new proposal:

"Far-left California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom said on Wednesday that he believes medical doctors should be able to prescribe people housing in the same manner that they prescribe medication to people who are sick.

“Health care and housing can no longer be divorced. After all, what’s more fundamental to a person’s well-being than a roof over their head?” Newsom said during his State of the State address. “Doctors should be able to write prescriptions for housing the same way they do for insulin or antibiotics.”
Democrat Gov Gavin Newsom: Doctors Should Be Able To Prescribe Housing Like Medication

Some gov't functions - and therefore taxes - are necessary and constitutionally justified. Our gov't has strayed far from the FF's intent.

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton

We need a flat tax, where as poor working people aren't penalized, and middle class working people aren't penalized, and the wealthy aren't penalized when paying taxes.

Then it comes down to the choices that each individual makes in order to get ahead in life.

No one should be penalized by a tax code whether they are rich or poor in life. The government doesn't need to be in the business of choosing winners and losers in life. It should be neutral and helpful in everything it does for everyone.

The tax codes are supposed to be wrote in ways in which help all, but not so sure if helping or hurting people with all the adds and loop holes written into the codes these days. Exploitation of the codes are probably rampant these days, because people don't seem to be doing as well as they should be, and alot of complaining is going on every election about it all. Time for real solutions.

The government shouldn't be in business to REGULATE what I want to do with my life, as it is my "CHOICE" what I do. Now if I am like a stupid liberal and walk down a busy street in protest and get my liberal dumb ass run over, then I should be responsible for my liberal stupid actions, not the driver, the city, the state, or the country.. Being liberal they never take responsibility for their actions, just like with abortion, they are quick to murder a baby because they had "CHOSEN" unwisely...

Yes, everything in degree's, where as we have to be protected from that drunk driver who decides to get in that vehicle turning it into a killing machine, and laws attempt to regulate drinking and driving to some degree. Doesn't stop it all together, but I would say that it helps. Because we love freedom, we don't ban things completely, otherwise for a person that drinks responsibly or has any other hobby he or she likes doing responsibly, then we condone and protect their right to do it. We don't judge all for the actions of a few in America, and that's what out freedoms are grounded in.

The left or liberals want to punish all for the actions of a few, thus leading this nation into a Nazi hell if we allow it to keep heading in that direction as a people who are gullable enough to let it go down that road. Freedom ain't easy, and keeping our freedom is tough these days. Being smart in recognizing what's going on is the key. Politics is leading this nation astray, because in politics these days we see many abuses taking place. Having leaders with ill intent isn't good, and this nation must continue to vote in freedom loving leadership whom don't have ill intent for us and our freedom loving nation.

Each state should have the DWI regulations not the Federal government. Also, it should be noted that the States should make it murder 1 if you kill someone while driving under the influence as people know when you drink and get behind the wheel, you have "loaded a weapon" that could kill. I think DWI's would dwindle quite quickly...As for drinking heavily , drink at home, if you want a beer at the bowling alley, 1 beer only.

 

[pknopp]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Wasn't talking about law abiding citizen's guns.

If you haven't been convicted of anything there is no way to determine that. That's also how "red flag" laws work.

You support them, obviously, right?

If you haven't been convicted of anything, then you are law abiding. We aren't in the assumption business, but we can be in the preventive business to a certain degree. If a person is showing proof of a will to do violent thing's to other innocent people, and to do it with any weapon of choice, be it with a knife, vehicle, gun or whatever, and we know this by threats the person is making, then yes we should be pro-active in trying to thwart that person from being able to commit or carry out such threats being made after making them.

It depends on who is writing the laws, and who they are writing them for these days, in which determines whether or not the intent behind the laws are good or bad. Laws written for political reason's are generally going to be bad, because they could be written in order to obtain an outcome that has nothing to do with actual justice being sought after in the law. People have got to be smart enough to know the difference's or we won't have a functioning republic anymore.

O.K. so you are on record in support of removing the rights of people without due process.

 

[karpenter]

an irrelevant canadian stirring the pot ^^^^^^^^^^

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Except Newsome Did Say It
Second Video:
Tom Elliott on Twitter
Doctors Should Prescribe Housing
Housing Will Magically Appear At The Pharmacy

Streets Will Be Clogged
By People Dragging Their Bungalows Chained To Their Bumpers

Or Maybe We'll All Live Like This:

 

[karpenter]

...they [Liberals] are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse.

Yes
Liberal Prog Socialism Is A Knee-Jerk Response Of Envy

 

[beagle9]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Wasn't talking about law abiding citizen's guns.

If you haven't been convicted of anything there is no way to determine that. That's also how "red flag" laws work.

You support them, obviously, right?

If you haven't been convicted of anything, then you are law abiding. We aren't in the assumption business, but we can be in the preventive business to a certain degree. If a person is showing proof of a will to do violent thing's to other innocent people, and to do it with any weapon of choice, be it with a knife, vehicle, gun or whatever, and we know this by threats the person is making, then yes we should be pro-active in trying to thwart that person from being able to commit or carry out such threats being made after making them.

It depends on who is writing the laws, and who they are writing them for these days, in which determines whether or not the intent behind the laws are good or bad. Laws written for political reason's are generally going to be bad, because they could be written in order to obtain an outcome that has nothing to do with actual justice being sought after in the law. People have got to be smart enough to know the difference's or we won't have a functioning republic anymore.

O.K. so you are on record in support of removing the rights of people without due process.

Nice try leftist, but if you commit a crime as in threatening someone's life with bodily harm, then your rights upon prosecution of that crime have ended until time is served or a rehibilitation process has been fully completed after sentencing.

You see, this is how you leftist roll. You listen and you listen until you THINK that you hear something that you can misconstrue or use, and then you pounce on hopes that the ignorant will take your bait Hook line and sinker. People are not as ignorant as you wish them to be, so just understand that, and then there might be hope for you changing in your attitudes and in your understanding yet.

 

[beagle9]

an irrelevant canadian stirring the pot ^^^^^^^^^^

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Except Newsome Did Say It
Second Video:
Tom Elliott on Twitter
Doctors Should Prescribe Housing
Housing Will Magically Appear At The Pharmacy

Streets Will Be Clogged
By People Dragging Their Bungalows Chained To Their Bumpers

Or Maybe We'll All Live Like This:

View attachment 307923

For a homeless person living on the street, that picture represents a mansion to them.

Makes me wonder if that is what's going on in this, where as the idea is to use the person's mental condition in order to justify government funds to get them shelter by doctor's order ?

 

[pknopp]

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Wasn't talking about law abiding citizen's guns.

If you haven't been convicted of anything there is no way to determine that. That's also how "red flag" laws work.

You support them, obviously, right?

If you haven't been convicted of anything, then you are law abiding. We aren't in the assumption business, but we can be in the preventive business to a certain degree. If a person is showing proof of a will to do violent thing's to other innocent people, and to do it with any weapon of choice, be it with a knife, vehicle, gun or whatever, and we know this by threats the person is making, then yes we should be pro-active in trying to thwart that person from being able to commit or carry out such threats being made after making them.

It depends on who is writing the laws, and who they are writing them for these days, in which determines whether or not the intent behind the laws are good or bad. Laws written for political reason's are generally going to be bad, because they could be written in order to obtain an outcome that has nothing to do with actual justice being sought after in the law. People have got to be smart enough to know the difference's or we won't have a functioning republic anymore.

O.K. so you are on record in support of removing the rights of people without due process.

Nice try leftist, but if you commit a crime as in threatening someone's life with bodily harm, then your rights upon prosecution of that crime have ended until time is served or a rehibilitation process has been fully completed after sentencing.

That isn't what Trump said. He said he would take a persons guns and ask questions later. No proof any crime was committed. Only accusations. No due process, only accusations. This is what you are supporting and you call me a "leftists"? Really?

Red flag laws can take a persons guns despite them not breaking any laws. Is this what you support because Trump has said he does.

Trump backs 'red flag' gun laws. What do they actually do? - CNNPolitics

You see, this is how you leftist roll. You listen and you listen until you THINK that you hear something that you can misconstrue or use, and then you pounce on hopes that the ignorant will take your bait Hook line and sinker. People are not as ignorant as you wish them to be, so just understand that, and then there might be hope for you changing in your attitudes and in your understanding yet.

Trump backs 'red flag' gun laws. What do they actually do? - CNNPolitics

What did I mishear?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

You want Rump so bad, you take him. I know of a bunch that even raise the bus fare. But you have to keep him.

Your post makes no sense at all.

So you're a government school grad, huh?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Whose economy do you want, the current President, of the former one, the Muslim guy?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Wasn't talking about law abiding citizen's guns.

So you never learned how to produce a cogent thought in government school?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Wasn't talking about law abiding citizen's guns.

If you haven't been convicted of anything there is no way to determine that. That's also how "red flag" laws work.

You support them, obviously, right?

So your plan is to insert any topic except the one that got under your scales.......how insane Liberalism is?


Keep tryin'....

 

[PoliticalChic]

How about 'like' with Newsom's 'doctors write prescriptions for housing'?

Is that a yes or no?

How about 'like' with Newsom's 'doctors write prescriptions for housing'?


While the issue brought you slithering in to voluntarily subscribe to the thread, you appear insistent on changing the issue.

Of course, I won't allow you to do so......that's why I am a much better teacher than those you've had in government school.

Had more been like me, you might actually have learned something.



Coulter put it this way:

Let me give you a little tip: if you want liberalism to continue in this country, you have to realize that liberal students are being let down by their professors! They have liberal school teachers, and read the liberal press! Because of this weak preparation, they are unable to argue, to think beyond the first knee-jerk impulse. They can’t put together a logical thought. Now, compare that to a college Republican…



Now, if the OP wounded you, perhaps the subject of Liberal insanity hits too close to home....you may slither away.
No one will be deprived of any insight you might have provided....as there is none.

The topic was giving away other people's money for votes.

It's OK when Trump does it like with the corporate farms?

The topic is liberal insanity. The OP pretty much nailed it.

Yet it seems you and her accept the same things out of Trump.

You mean things like this?



80. "Wages and salaries jump by 3.1%, highest level in a decade

• Wages and salaries rose 3.1 percent in the third quarter, the biggest increase in a decade, according to the Labor Department.
• Overall compensation costs were up 2.8 percent, ahead of Wall Street expectations." Wages and salaries jump by 3.1%, highest level in a decade

81. “Job growth surges by 312,000 in December” Job growth surges by 312,000 in December
82. "Unemployment hits 49-year low as US employers step up hiring"
Unemployment hits 49-year low as US employers step up hiring


"The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 50% of Likely U.S. Voters approve of President Trump’s job performance. "
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll - Rasmussen Reports®

83. "Record 157,288,000 Employed in July

(CNSNews.com) - The number of people employed in the United States hit a record 157,288,000 in July, according to the employment report released today by the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
That was up 283,000 from the 157,005,000 employed in June."
Record 157,288,000 Employed in July


84. “…Planned Parenthood announced that it would withdraw from Title X, a federal family planning program that helps poor women access birth control and other health services. As a result, the organization will lose about $60 million a year in federal funding. The decision was made in response to a new Trump administration rule which forbids Title X clinics from referring patients for abortions.” Planned Parenthood Just Lost $60M in Funding. What Does That Mean for Women?
85. “U.S. adds 136,000 jobs in September, unemployment rate hits 50-year low”
Published: Oct 4, 2019 10:32 a.m. ET

U.S. adds 136,000 jobs in September, unemployment rate hits 50-year low
86. “Record 158,510,000 Americans Employed in October; 23rd Record for Trump” Record 158,510,000 Americans Employed in October; 23rd Record for Trump
87. “Black Unemployment Rate Hits All Time Low”
Huge October Payrolls Beat: 128K Jobs Added As Black Unemployment Rate Hits All Time Low
88. “Dow jumps more than 200 points to 28,000, posts 4-week winning streak The Dow Jones Industrial Average rallied to record levels on Friday, reaching 28,000 for the first time ever…” Dow jumps more than 200 points to 28,000, posts 4-week winning streak
89. “Jobs growth soars in November as payrolls surge by 266,000

Nonfarm payrolls surged by 266,000 in November, better than the 187,000 expected by economists polled by Dow Jones.

The unemployment rate ticked down to 3.5% from 3.6%, back to the 2019 low and matching the lowest jobless rate since 1969.

Average hourly earnings rose by 3.1% from a year ago, slightly above the 3% expected by economists polled by Dow Jones. Jobs growth soars in November as payrolls surge by 266,000


90. “CNN Poll: US economy receives its best ranking in nearly 20 years
(CNN)As 2019 comes to a close, the US economy earns its highest ratings in almost two decades, potentially boosting President Donald Trump in matchups against the Democrats vying to face him in next year's election, according to a new CNN poll conducted by SSRS.’” US economy receives its best ranking in nearly 20 years, CNN poll finds - CNNPolitics

91." Appointing conservative judges is the one objective that unites the Republican Party. It is one of the few things the Senate can do without the House.

And it is something that immediately impacts public policy because, during times of divided government, many political fights end up being resolved judicially.

Trump may not have the “best people” representing him or running his White House, but he’s picking them to be judges. Indeed, “based solely on objective legal credentials,” left-leaning Vox’s Ian Millhiser says, “the average Trump appointee has a far more impressive résumé than any past president’s nominees.”
Approximately 40 percent of Trump’s appellate nominees clerked for a Supreme Court justice, and about 80 percent clerked on a federal court of appeals. That compares to less than a quarter of Obama’s nominees who clerked on the Supreme Court, and less than half with a federal appellate clerkship."
All We Want for Christmas is More Judges: Ho, Ho, Ho

92. “China Says Economic Growth Fell to Lowest in 30 Years
China’s economy was weighed down by U.S. tariffs…” China Says Economic Growth Fell to Lowest in 30 Years | Breitbart

93. “Boom! Trump Has The Lowest Average Unemployment Rate of Any President in Recorded History” Boom! Trump Has The Lowest Average Unemployment Rate of Any President in Recorded History
94. “Private payrolls soar in January, the best monthly gain in nearly 5 years The jobs market kicked off 2020 in grand fashion, adding 291,000 in private payrolls for the best monthly gain since May 2015, according to a report Wednesday from ADP and Moody’s Analytics. That was well above the 150,000 estimate from economists…” Private payrolls soar in January, the best monthly gain in nearly 5 years

95. “Trump Budget Cuts Size of Federal Government,
President Donald Trump’s proposed budget for fiscal year 2021 would reduce the size and reach of the federal bureaucracy significantly by shifting government responsibilities back to constitutional priorities and empowering state and local governments. These reforms, contained in the request Trump sent Monday morning to Congress, would put the budget on track to balance and represent a significant first step toward reducing spending and stabilizing the nation’s unsustainable debt.” Trump Budget Cuts Federal Government, but Bolder Reforms Needed

 

[PoliticalChic]

....we have proof about the rumor that Democrats/Liberals are insane.


1. Government doesn't earn any money. It taxes folks who earn money, to get the money to give it away so as to buy votes.

2. Missing the point of where their money comes from, capitalism, insane politicians do everything possible to steal the money, and the ability to make more money, from earners....via theft called socialism.




3. But....they are inventive in their insanity.
Today, California 'chief insanity officer' has this amazing new proposal:

"Far-left California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom said on Wednesday that he believes medical doctors should be able to prescribe people housing in the same manner that they prescribe medication to people who are sick.

“Health care and housing can no longer be divorced. After all, what’s more fundamental to a person’s well-being than a roof over their head?” Newsom said during his State of the State address. “Doctors should be able to write prescriptions for housing the same way they do for insulin or antibiotics.”
Democrat Gov Gavin Newsom: Doctors Should Be Able To Prescribe Housing Like Medication

Some gov't functions - and therefore taxes - are necessary and constitutionally justified. Our gov't has strayed far from the FF's intent.

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton

We need a flat tax, where as poor working people aren't penalized, and middle class working people aren't penalized, and the wealthy aren't penalized when paying taxes.

Then it comes down to the choices that each individual makes in order to get ahead in life.

No one should be penalized by a tax code whether they are rich or poor in life. The government doesn't need to be in the business of choosing winners and losers in life. It should be neutral and helpful in everything it does for everyone.

The tax codes are supposed to be wrote in ways in which help all, but not so sure if helping or hurting people with all the adds and loop holes written into the codes these days. Exploitation of the codes are probably rampant these days, because people don't seem to be doing as well as they should be, and alot of complaining is going on every election about it all. Time for real solutions.

The government shouldn't be in business to REGULATE what I want to do with my life, as it is my "CHOICE" what I do. Now if I am like a stupid liberal and walk down a busy street in protest and get my liberal dumb ass run over, then I should be responsible for my liberal stupid actions, not the driver, the city, the state, or the country.. Being liberal they never take responsibility for their actions, just like with abortion, they are quick to murder a baby because they had "CHOSEN" unwisely...

"Being liberal they never take responsibility for their actions,..."


Well, considering that they were promised exactly that, that they have no responsibility for their lives or actions.....I guess believing the lie is their fault.


Now they're waiting for the government to 'prescribe' a house for 'em....

 

[PoliticalChic]

....we have proof about the rumor that Democrats/Liberals are insane.


1. Government doesn't earn any money. It taxes folks who earn money, to get the money to give it away so as to buy votes.

2. Missing the point of where their money comes from, capitalism, insane politicians do everything possible to steal the money, and the ability to make more money, from earners....via theft called socialism.




3. But....they are inventive in their insanity.
Today, California 'chief insanity officer' has this amazing new proposal:

"Far-left California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom said on Wednesday that he believes medical doctors should be able to prescribe people housing in the same manner that they prescribe medication to people who are sick.

“Health care and housing can no longer be divorced. After all, what’s more fundamental to a person’s well-being than a roof over their head?” Newsom said during his State of the State address. “Doctors should be able to write prescriptions for housing the same way they do for insulin or antibiotics.”
Democrat Gov Gavin Newsom: Doctors Should Be Able To Prescribe Housing Like Medication

Some gov't functions - and therefore taxes - are necessary and constitutionally justified. Our gov't has strayed far from the FF's intent.

"Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." - Lord Acton

We need a flat tax, where as poor working people aren't penalized, and middle class working people aren't penalized, and the wealthy aren't penalized when paying taxes.

Then it comes down to the choices that each individual makes in order to get ahead in life.

No one should be penalized by a tax code whether they are rich or poor in life. The government doesn't need to be in the business of choosing winners and losers in life. It should be neutral and helpful in everything it does for everyone.

The tax codes are supposed to be wrote in ways in which help all, but not so sure if helping or hurting people with all the adds and loop holes written into the codes these days. Exploitation of the codes are probably rampant these days, because people don't seem to be doing as well as they should be, and alot of complaining is going on every election about it all. Time for real solutions.

The government shouldn't be in business to REGULATE what I want to do with my life, as it is my "CHOICE" what I do. Now if I am like a stupid liberal and walk down a busy street in protest and get my liberal dumb ass run over, then I should be responsible for my liberal stupid actions, not the driver, the city, the state, or the country.. Being liberal they never take responsibility for their actions, just like with abortion, they are quick to murder a baby because they had "CHOSEN" unwisely...

Yes, everything in degree's, where as we have to be protected from that drunk driver who decides to get in that vehicle turning it into a killing machine, and laws attempt to regulate drinking and driving to some degree. Doesn't stop it all together, but I would say that it helps. Because we love freedom, we don't ban things completely, otherwise for a person that drinks responsibly or has any other hobby he or she likes doing responsibly, then we condone and protect their right to do it. We don't judge all for the actions of a few in America, and that's what out freedoms are grounded in.

The left or liberals want to punish all for the actions of a few, thus leading this nation into a Nazi hell if we allow it to keep heading in that direction as a people who are gullable enough to let it go down that road. Freedom ain't easy, and keeping our freedom is tough these days. Being smart in recognizing what's going on is the key. Politics is leading this nation astray, because in politics these days we see many abuses taking place. Having leaders with ill intent isn't good, and this nation must continue to vote in freedom loving leadership whom don't have ill intent for us and our freedom loving nation.

Each state should have the DWI regulations not the Federal government. Also, it should be noted that the States should make it murder 1 if you kill someone while driving under the influence as people know when you drink and get behind the wheel, you have "loaded a weapon" that could kill. I think DWI's would dwindle quite quickly...As for drinking heavily , drink at home, if you want a beer at the bowling alley, 1 beer only.

You have my vote!

 

[PoliticalChic]

an irrelevant canadian stirring the pot ^^^^^^^^^^oExcept Newsome Did Say It
Second Video:
Tom Elliott on Twitter
Doctors Should Prescribe Housing
Housing Will Magically Appear At The Pharmacy

Streets Will Be Clogged
By People Dragging Their Bungalows Chained To Their Bumpers

Or Maybe We'll All Live Like This:

View attachment 307923

For a homeless person living on the street, that picture represents a mansion to them.

Makes me wonder if that is what's going on in this, where as the idea is to use the person's mental condition in order to justify government funds to get them shelter by doctor's order ?

Did you know that the Democrat's are responsible for closing the mental hospitals?


True story.

Did you know that the Democrat's are responsible for closing the mental hospitals?


True story.

 

[pknopp]

Here's a lesson for Democrats/Liberals, one more lacunae due to government schooling....

No one has a 'right' to a home at government expense.


Let's review the correct meaning of the term 'right.'

Here is what ‘rights’ are.
A right is something an individual has by virtue of being human.

1. Human beings are the only entities that have rights.

2. Rights belong to each human individually.

3. Rights are exercised by individuals, and are not given nor ascribed by any person of group, especially governments.

4. Rights are voluntary, in that individuals may choose whether to either exercise them or to ignore them.

5. Individual cannot have a right that infringes upon or diminishes the rights of others.

6. To be clear, ‘benefits’ such as education, shelter, or a job require resources from somewhere else, and therefore, cannot be given or protected without restricting another’s right to the property of his hands or mind.


For conservatives, rights precede government. Government’s purpose is to protect those rights.



Get it now, Liberals????

Like when Trump said he would take people's guns and ask questions later?

Whose economy do you want, the current President, of the former one, the Muslim guy?

Neither, they both are the same. Massive socialism out of the Fed.