- May 20, 2009
- 145,741
- 68,577
- 2,330
Reactionary Jake is the flip side of Rdeans broken record
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Reactionary Jake is the flip side of Rdeans broken record
Reactionary Jake is the flip side of Rdeans broken record
put them both on ignore, it will greatly improve your experience on USMB
"Warped morals" aye... you mean like two men fucking each other up the ass? Isn't that the pet love of the left and progressives? Why yes, yes it is.How on earth can things be more productive using Conservative policies? All the wealth would be sequestered among a very few and none of it would ever trickle down to the majority. Investment would be seen as a far greater way to produce wealth and actual work in production would be either exported or exploited.
How would the society be more peaceful and freer? Conservatives throw liberty around as if it was manhole covers. Same sex marriage? Stop and frisk? Reproductive freedom? Workplace safety? All these things and more are adamantly opposed by Conservatives! Why? Because assuring safety and freedom costs money and warped morals are used to justify political decisions.
Do you want Conservative rule? Try Iran or Somalia where the governments are either repressive or non-existent.
I actually wrote:"Warped morals" aye... you mean like two men fucking each other up the ass? Isn't that the pet love of the left and progressives? Why yes, yes it is.How on earth can things be more productive using Conservative policies? All the wealth would be sequestered among a very few and none of it would ever trickle down to the majority. Investment would be seen as a far greater way to produce wealth and actual work in production would be either exported or exploited.
How would the society be more peaceful and freer? Conservatives throw liberty around as if it was manhole covers. Same sex marriage? Stop and frisk? Reproductive freedom? Workplace safety? All these things and more are adamantly opposed by Conservatives! Why? Because assuring safety and freedom costs money and warped morals are used to justify political decisions.
Do you want Conservative rule? Try Iran or Somalia where the governments are either repressive or non-existent.
Now tell me again about "warped morals" without sounding like a complete hypocrite.
.warped morals are used to justify political decisions
Every nation is progressive or it does not survive. The only question is what nations fare best, those that are extremely progressive, mildly or scarcely progressive? What is America's rate of progressiveness compared to the rest of the world?
Well, that is a question easily answered.Every nation is progressive or it does not survive. The only question is what nations fare best, those that are extremely progressive, mildly or scarcely progressive? What is America's rate of progressiveness compared to the rest of the world?
How on earth can things be more productive using Conservative policies? All the wealth would be sequestered among a very few and none of it would ever trickle down to the majority. Investment would be seen as a far greater way to produce wealth and actual work in production would be either exported or exploited.
How would the society be more peaceful and freer? Conservatives throw liberty around as if it was manhole covers. Same sex marriage? Stop and frisk? Reproductive freedom? Workplace safety? All these things and more are adamantly opposed by Conservatives! Why? Because assuring safety and freedom costs money and warped morals are used to justify political decisions.
Do you want Conservative rule? Try Iran or Somalia where the governments are either repressive or non-existent.
Yawn. Well, Mr. Johnny-come-lately, my ancestors were among the earliest settlers near Jamestown, and are mentioned in histories of the First Families of Virginia.BORN and BRED. I have direct Relatives that fought under Washington, and have Counties named after them in their honour.Principles? You have principles?YES, LAWS change all the time...but the standing query is: should principle(s)?
Are you really an American? · ·![]()
My Family shed blood and served this Republic. Can YOU say the same?
Principles? You have principles?YES, LAWS change all the time...but the standing query is: should principle(s)?
Are you really an American? · ·
.
Every nation is progressive or it does not survive. The only question is what nations fare best, those that are extremely progressive, mildly or scarcely progressive? What is America's rate of progressiveness compared to the rest of the world?
How does welfare or socialized medicine help a nation survive?
Whatever your context was using "warp morals," "warp morals" is and always will be "warped morals." The term is a blanket term that defines a great many things.I actually wrote:"Warped morals" aye... you mean like two men fucking each other up the ass? Isn't that the pet love of the left and progressives? Why yes, yes it is.How on earth can things be more productive using Conservative policies? All the wealth would be sequestered among a very few and none of it would ever trickle down to the majority. Investment would be seen as a far greater way to produce wealth and actual work in production would be either exported or exploited.
How would the society be more peaceful and freer? Conservatives throw liberty around as if it was manhole covers. Same sex marriage? Stop and frisk? Reproductive freedom? Workplace safety? All these things and more are adamantly opposed by Conservatives! Why? Because assuring safety and freedom costs money and warped morals are used to justify political decisions.
Do you want Conservative rule? Try Iran or Somalia where the governments are either repressive or non-existent.
Now tell me again about "warped morals" without sounding like a complete hypocrite.
.warped morals are used to justify political decisions
Bible thumpers gleaning the most extraneous phrases to get on the political bandwagon. As if we would EVER allow narrow Biblical interpretations to provide a scaffolding for secular law!
Mississippi most conservative state. Vermont most liberal.
Where would you rather live?
Following the Regan regime where the rich were coddled and taxes on them cut, the vast majority in the American middle class began lo9sing ground. Can you deny that? The income disparity relegated wealth to the few while it drained it from the many. And, in theory, that wealth was supposed to precipitate back down to those who actually did the work.How on earth can things be more productive using Conservative policies? All the wealth would be sequestered among a very few and none of it would ever trickle down to the majority. Investment would be seen as a far greater way to produce wealth and actual work in production would be either exported or exploited.
AH, so no one but the very rich owned a motor car in the 1920s? A refrigerator? Radio?
House? What other way is there to produce wealth than by investment? What do investors do with their money other than use it to create factories and businesses were production occurs? Was it all exported in the 1920s?
The historical evidence just doesn't seem to support your lame-assed Marxist economic theories.
How would the society be more peaceful and freer? Conservatives throw liberty around as if it was manhole covers. Same sex marriage? Stop and frisk? Reproductive freedom? Workplace safety? All these things and more are adamantly opposed by Conservatives! Why? Because assuring safety and freedom costs money and warped morals are used to justify political decisions.
When have conservatives ever proposed to eliminate "reproductive freedom?" "Stop and Frisk" is the policy of a liberal New York mayor. Same-sex marriage has nothing to do with freedom. Assuring freedom would only cost about 10% of what we currently spend on government. Safety can easily be achieved without the vast regulatory bureaucracies that currently terrorize American business.
Do you want Conservative rule? Try Iran or Somalia where the governments are either repressive or non-existent.
Government is non-existent in Iran?
Mississippi most conservative state. Vermont most liberal.
Where would you rather live?
Mississippi, the women are better looking, weather is better, taxes are lower and you dont have a bunch of stinky hippes everywhere.
Mississippi most conservative state. Vermont most liberal.
Where would you rather live?
Mississippi, the women are better looking, weather is better, taxes are lower and you dont have a bunch of stinky hippes everywhere.
Mississippi where the schools suck all the way up to the university level, you can expect to find unmounted car tires used as landscape accents and where you can find a bunch of ignorant hayseed rednecks making decisions.