If the Bill of Rights makes liberalism illegal how does liberalism survive?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Our genius Founders were not sure a Bill of Rights was necessary. The Constitution, for example, did not say anything about guns so why worry that the Federal Govt would assume the authority to restrict them? Similarly, the Constitution did not say anything about non-enumerated powers so why worry Federal govt would assume the authority to exercise non-enumerated powers? But, just in case extreme liberalism, at some point, did afflict our country they included a Bill of Rights. Little did they anticipate that treasonous liberals would ignore both the Constitution and reinforcing Bill of Rights. Nevertheless, our Founding documents are still our founding documents; with enough support liberalism, now libcommieism, can be made illegal tomorrow!!

 

[Fed Starving]

They're having a battle of definition that loses sight of the true value of those documents. They think fancy word games can let them circumvent our rights. They can't win unless the wrong people are running the place.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They're having a battle of definition that loses sight of the true value of those documents. They think fancy word games can let them circumvent our rights. They can't win unless the wrong people are running the place.

When they say the Constitution is a living document they mean it is a living communist document. Does anybody doubt that is the direction in which they are heading?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Special Ed – always entertaining, and wrong.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Special Ed – always entertaining, and wrong.

at least ed will defend what he throws up....something you dont do......no doubt because you would get bitch slapped most of the time....

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

They're having a battle of definition that loses sight of the true value of those documents. They think fancy word games can let them circumvent our rights. They can't win unless the wrong people are running the place.

Yes, the Constitution is all about strictly limiting govt while the Democrats are all about strictly unlimiting govt. So how do they survive in America?

 

[Agit8r]

Our genius Founders were not sure a Bill of Rights was necessary. The Constitution, for example, did not say anything about guns so why worry that the Federal Govt would assume the authority to restrict them? Similarly, the Constitution did not say anything about non-enumerated powers so why worry Federal govt would assume the authority to exercise non-enumerated powers? But, just in case extreme liberalism, at some point, did afflict our country they included a Bill of Rights. Little did they anticipate that treasonous liberals would ignore both the Constitution and reinforcing Bill of Rights. Nevertheless, our Founding documents are still our founding documents; with enough support liberalism, now libcommieism, can be made illegal tomorrow!!

Was alcohol a factor in the typing of this post?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Our genius Founders were not sure a Bill of Rights was necessary. The Constitution, for example, did not say anything about guns so why worry that the Federal Govt would assume the authority to restrict them? Similarly, the Constitution did not say anything about non-enumerated powers so why worry Federal govt would assume the authority to exercise non-enumerated powers? But, just in case extreme liberalism, at some point, did afflict our country they included a Bill of Rights. Little did they anticipate that treasonous liberals would ignore both the Constitution and reinforcing Bill of Rights. Nevertheless, our Founding documents are still our founding documents; with enough support liberalism, now libcommieism, can be made illegal tomorrow!!

Was alcohol a factor in the typing of this post?

I know you are just a liberal but if you object please try to present your objection in the form of a counter argument or simply admit you lack the IQ to do so with your silence, personal attacks or attempts to change the subject.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Special Ed – always entertaining, and wrong.

at least ed will defend what he throws up....something you dont do......no doubt because you would get bitch slapped most of the time....

Clayton dropped out of HS apparently so never goes beyond a personal attack. Embarrassing but that's been his MO for years.

 

[Markle]

Our genius Founders were not sure a Bill of Rights was necessary. The Constitution, for example, did not say anything about guns so why worry that the Federal Govt would assume the authority to restrict them? Similarly, the Constitution did not say anything about non-enumerated powers so why worry Federal govt would assume the authority to exercise non-enumerated powers? But, just in case extreme liberalism, at some point, did afflict our country they included a Bill of Rights. Little did they anticipate that treasonous liberals would ignore both the Constitution and reinforcing Bill of Rights. Nevertheless, our Founding documents are still our founding documents; with enough support liberalism, now libcommieism, can be made illegal tomorrow!!

Apparently, few people have read the First Amendment much less the rest of our great Constitution!

Democrats SEEM to be skipping a word or two.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Our genius Founders were not sure a Bill of Rights was necessary. The Constitution, for example, did not say anything about guns so why worry that the Federal Govt would assume the authority to restrict them? Similarly, the Constitution did not say anything about non-enumerated powers so why worry Federal govt would assume the authority to exercise non-enumerated powers? But, just in case extreme liberalism, at some point, did afflict our country they included a Bill of Rights. Little did they anticipate that treasonous liberals would ignore both the Constitution and reinforcing Bill of Rights. Nevertheless, our Founding documents are still our founding documents; with enough support liberalism, now libcommieism, can be made illegal tomorrow!!

Was alcohol a factor in the typing of this post?

translation: as a typical liberal I lack the IQ to respond substantively.

 

[Agit8r]

Our genius Founders were not sure a Bill of Rights was necessary. The Constitution, for example, did not say anything about guns so why worry that the Federal Govt would assume the authority to restrict them? Similarly, the Constitution did not say anything about non-enumerated powers so why worry Federal govt would assume the authority to exercise non-enumerated powers? But, just in case extreme liberalism, at some point, did afflict our country they included a Bill of Rights. Little did they anticipate that treasonous liberals would ignore both the Constitution and reinforcing Bill of Rights. Nevertheless, our Founding documents are still our founding documents; with enough support liberalism, now libcommieism, can be made illegal tomorrow!!

Was alcohol a factor in the typing of this post?

translation: as a typical liberal I lack the IQ to respond substantively.

So what part of the constitution says it is ok for the police to assault the press?

Oh, right the First and Incorporation Clause of the Fourteenth specifically forbids anything of the kind at any level of government.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

So what part of the constitution says it is ok for the police to assault the press?

no part of course. Do you have any idea why you asked??

 

[progressive hunter]

Our genius Founders were not sure a Bill of Rights was necessary. The Constitution, for example, did not say anything about guns so why worry that the Federal Govt would assume the authority to restrict them? Similarly, the Constitution did not say anything about non-enumerated powers so why worry Federal govt would assume the authority to exercise non-enumerated powers? But, just in case extreme liberalism, at some point, did afflict our country they included a Bill of Rights. Little did they anticipate that treasonous liberals would ignore both the Constitution and reinforcing Bill of Rights. Nevertheless, our Founding documents are still our founding documents; with enough support liberalism, now libcommieism, can be made illegal tomorrow!!

I think youre confused on what liberalism really is,,,

I think you mean leftist not liberal,,,

 

[Agit8r]

So what part of the constitution says it is ok for the police to assault the press?

no part of course. Do you have any idea why you asked??

I'm trying to understand what the OP is saying. (and maybe I lost track of what thread this was). Look, we are past the point of limiting this government to enumerated powers, without some significant reforms. The people in the streets are asking for reforms limiting the scope of governments. But it is a big country and a lot of people have taken to the streets. You only see the most shocking things on the mainstream news, because "if it bleeds it leads."
So, you can go on demonizing liberals, or you can try to contribute to discussing practical ways of limiting government--which many in the younger generation are actually open to. Reforming police being just one example.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Look, we are past the point of limiting this government to enumerated powers, without some significant reforms.

We are not past it. It is what conservatives and libertarians stand for and what our genius Founders stood for. Did you think they were worried the Girl Scouts were going take your freedom of speech away???

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

The people in the streets are asking for reforms limiting the scope of governments.

wrong they are communists looking for a huge communist govt that will give them reparations and welfare , exactly what caused the problem in the first place.

 

[progressive hunter]

Look, we are past the point of limiting this government to enumerated powers, without some significant reforms.

We are not past it. It is what conservatives and libertarians stand for and what our genius Founders stood for. Did you think they were worried the Girl Scouts were going take your freedom of speech away???

when did the girl scouts take away anyones freedom of speech???

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

So, you can go on demonizing liberals, or you can try to contribute to discussing practical ways of limiting government-

First way is to cut taxes and spending and regulations, obviously.

Second way is to cut social engineering programs that created the school to prison pipeline and destroyed love and family in the black community.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

when did the girl scouts take away anyones freedom of speech???

Never, our genius Founders were worried about future liberal governments taking away our freedoms which is why the Bill of Rights was added to Constitution!