Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I believe the odds are slightly better than 50-50 he will as most states go to a closed primary, where Democratic voters will not be able to help Mr Trump. Now of course, that is assuming that Rubio isn't propped up by the GOP attempting everything possible to get to a brokered convention as they despise Cruz as much, or more than Trump.
As of this particular time, it appears that Cruz would beat Hillary, and the same scenario goes for Cruz as for Trump; Kasich as VP takes Ohio, Cruz makes it slightly more difficult to secure Florida, although being of Cuban descent will have it's impact there for sure.
This is the only scenario that gives the GOP a non Trump nomination, that will not send Trump supporters off the deep end, unless anyone believes that Kasich or Rubio can catch him. Send this to a brokered convention and not choose Trump if he has the most delegates, and watch all hell break loose if he is not the nominee. But if he loses fair and square, tranquility may very well be restored to the GOP ranks, although the GOP establishment will surely be grinding their teeth! And yet, they really can't complain much, since their whole shtick has been to depose Trump; it is just they couldn't get "Little Marco" in that position-)
Geeze dude, you are playing popular vote politics, instead of electoral politics. I am not interested in New York, nor California. Ronald Reagan could be reincarnated today and lose those big!
Trump has a path to electoral victory, even if 100% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts vote for Hillary. In essence, that is all that matters.
I'm not playing "popular vote politics." Ohio and FL are where the general election will be won. Trump can't win either in a general election. Both states have moderate electorates that went blue for the past two elections. They're not going to flip red for a radical like Trump.
Geeze dude, you are playing popular vote politics, instead of electoral politics. I am not interested in New York, nor California. Ronald Reagan could be reincarnated today and lose those big!
Trump has a path to electoral victory, even if 100% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts vote for Hillary. In essence, that is all that matters.
I'm not playing "popular vote politics." Ohio and FL are where the general election will be won. Trump can't win either in a general election. Both states have moderate electorates that went blue for the past two elections. They're not going to flip red for a radical like Trump.
And just in case you doubted me, (which I am sure you did)-------->
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Colorado Presidential Polls
Early polls, but not too worry, Trump will not be the GOP candidate.OK, whatever you say, sorry for bringing it up!
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Florida Presidential Polls
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Ohio Presidential Polls
Next question?
Geeze dude, you are playing popular vote politics, instead of electoral politics. I am not interested in New York, nor California. Ronald Reagan could be reincarnated today and lose those big!
Trump has a path to electoral victory, even if 100% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts vote for Hillary. In essence, that is all that matters.
I'm not playing "popular vote politics." Ohio and FL are where the general election will be won. Trump can't win either in a general election. Both states have moderate electorates that went blue for the past two elections. They're not going to flip red for a radical like Trump.
OK, whatever you say, sorry for bringing it up!
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Florida Presidential Polls
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Ohio Presidential Polls
Next question?
Cruz is my number one choice to go up against Hillary.
The safer of two crazies.
What makes Cruz "Crazy"? So far all I've heard about Cruz is "he's mean, he's not liked, he's nutters" but most people don't know why. Its more of "I've heard this about him, or "everyone says it about him".
The man was elected Senator after all.
Let's take his filibuster shenanigans. It was nothing but a big loss. Cruz is too stubborn, and would rather lose for his own vanity than compromise and get things done for the good of the country.
Geeze dude, you are playing popular vote politics, instead of electoral politics. I am not interested in New York, nor California. Ronald Reagan could be reincarnated today and lose those big!
Trump has a path to electoral victory, even if 100% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts vote for Hillary. In essence, that is all that matters.
I'm not playing "popular vote politics." Ohio and FL are where the general election will be won. Trump can't win either in a general election. Both states have moderate electorates that went blue for the past two elections. They're not going to flip red for a radical like Trump.
And just in case you doubted me, (which I am sure you did)-------->
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Colorado Presidential Polls
Newest Data on Colorado, internals say Trump by 7. So there you have it!
I would prefer someone besides Trump, BUT.................trying to convinve everyone he has no path to 270 is just bogus, lefty, wishful, thinking!
Geeze dude, you are playing popular vote politics, instead of electoral politics. I am not interested in New York, nor California. Ronald Reagan could be reincarnated today and lose those big!
Trump has a path to electoral victory, even if 100% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts vote for Hillary. In essence, that is all that matters.
I'm not playing "popular vote politics." Ohio and FL are where the general election will be won. Trump can't win either in a general election. Both states have moderate electorates that went blue for the past two elections. They're not going to flip red for a radical like Trump.
OK, whatever you say, sorry for bringing it up!
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Florida Presidential Polls
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Ohio Presidential Polls
Next question?
Your links show nothing more than a statistical tie. That is not surprising, telling us nothing more than the fact that both states are swing states. We saw the same thing in 2008 and 2012. Nonetheless, they both went blue, authoritatively at that.
The only way a candidate Trump would ever win either state in a general election would be when facing an equally lunatic candidate on the Democrat side. If the Democrats were serving up Nancy Pelosi, then sure, there would be a chance for a Trump win. But they're not, and whether we like Clinton or not, we both know that she's just as much of a savvy politician to generate the same kind of get-the-vote-out campaign in those states that secured both for Obama twice. Trump can't do that. He'll threaten to sue anyone who doesn't vote for him, and all the centrists and undecideds will give them the finger.
So that one event makes him "crazy"?
I am one of those people who do see stubbornness as a bad thing. And "for the good of the country" and "compromise" has for far too often meant that progressives expect people who disagree with them to roll over and accept whatever crumbs they graciously are willing to give them.
Geeze dude, you are playing popular vote politics, instead of electoral politics. I am not interested in New York, nor California. Ronald Reagan could be reincarnated today and lose those big!
Trump has a path to electoral victory, even if 100% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts vote for Hillary. In essence, that is all that matters.
I'm not playing "popular vote politics." Ohio and FL are where the general election will be won. Trump can't win either in a general election. Both states have moderate electorates that went blue for the past two elections. They're not going to flip red for a radical like Trump.
OK, whatever you say, sorry for bringing it up!
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Florida Presidential Polls
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Ohio Presidential Polls
Next question?
Your links show nothing more than a statistical tie. That is not surprising, telling us nothing more than the fact that both states are swing states. We saw the same thing in 2008 and 2012. Nonetheless, they both went blue, authoritatively at that.
The only way a candidate Trump would ever win either state in a general election would be when facing an equally lunatic candidate on the Democrat side. If the Democrats were serving up Nancy Pelosi, then sure, there would be a chance for a Trump win. But they're not, and whether we like Clinton or not, we both know that she's just as much of a savvy politician to generate the same kind of get-the-vote-out campaign in those states that secured both for Obama twice. Trump can't do that. He'll threaten to sue anyone who doesn't vote for him, and all the centrists and undecideds will give them the finger.
My good man, all I am responding to is to your assertion he can't win and will get hammered. My science proves that your statement; at this time anyway, is patently false. I don't claim it as a victory, I am just showing everyone that ANYONE who insists he can't win, is blowing smoke, nothing more, nothing less.
Geeze dude, you are playing popular vote politics, instead of electoral politics. I am not interested in New York, nor California. Ronald Reagan could be reincarnated today and lose those big!
Trump has a path to electoral victory, even if 100% of the people in California, New York, and Massachusetts vote for Hillary. In essence, that is all that matters.
I'm not playing "popular vote politics." Ohio and FL are where the general election will be won. Trump can't win either in a general election. Both states have moderate electorates that went blue for the past two elections. They're not going to flip red for a radical like Trump.
OK, whatever you say, sorry for bringing it up!
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Florida Presidential Polls
2016 Trump vs. Clinton Ohio Presidential Polls
Next question?
Your links show nothing more than a statistical tie. That is not surprising, telling us nothing more than the fact that both states are swing states. We saw the same thing in 2008 and 2012. Nonetheless, they both went blue, authoritatively at that.
The only way a candidate Trump would ever win either state in a general election would be when facing an equally lunatic candidate on the Democrat side. If the Democrats were serving up Nancy Pelosi, then sure, there would be a chance for a Trump win. But they're not, and whether we like Clinton or not, we both know that she's just as much of a savvy politician to generate the same kind of get-the-vote-out campaign in those states that secured both for Obama twice. Trump can't do that. He'll threaten to sue anyone who doesn't vote for him, and all the centrists and undecideds will give them the finger.
My good man, all I am responding to is to your assertion he can't win and will get hammered. My science proves that your statement; at this time anyway, is patently false. I don't claim it as a victory, I am just showing everyone that ANYONE who insists he can't win, is blowing smoke, nothing more, nothing less.
o_0
There is no "science" to what you are saying. Don't get me wrong, I understand your point. But it's based on a limited analysis. You are being hopeful, at best.
So that one event makes him "crazy"?
No, it's the other way around. Being a lunatic makes him do things like filibuster the government into a shutdown in a futile hope to repeal a law that isn't going to be repealed. It proves that Cruz has no idea how to get along with other people. It's his way, or no way.
I am one of those people who do see stubbornness as a bad thing. And "for the good of the country" and "compromise" has for far too often meant that progressives expect people who disagree with them to roll over and accept whatever crumbs they graciously are willing to give them.
Committing the same mistakes is no solution. Getting a reasonable conservative into the White House who knows how to govern and lead is the solution. Trying to force our way in with a lunatic whose adult behavior in the 21st century mirrors his take-over-the-world goals expressed as a teenager, who stands minimal chance of defeating the Democrats, is not the way to go.
So that one event makes him "crazy"?
No, it's the other way around. Being a lunatic makes him do things like filibuster the government into a shutdown in a futile hope to repeal a law that isn't going to be repealed. It proves that Cruz has no idea how to get along with other people. It's his way, or no way.
I am one of those people who do see stubbornness as a bad thing. And "for the good of the country" and "compromise" has for far too often meant that progressives expect people who disagree with them to roll over and accept whatever crumbs they graciously are willing to give them.
Committing the same mistakes is no solution. Getting a reasonable conservative into the White House who knows how to govern and lead is the solution. Trying to force our way in with a lunatic whose adult behavior in the 21st century mirrors his take-over-the-world goals expressed as a teenager, who stands minimal chance of defeating the Democrats, is not the way to go.
Obama is the same freaking way Again progressive see compromise as "getting what I want, and you can save face some how".
I still don't see how Cruz can be labelled a "lunatic" without realizing that the label is nothing but a progressive construct, which is aided by more establishment republicans.
So that one event makes him "crazy"?
No, it's the other way around. Being a lunatic makes him do things like filibuster the government into a shutdown in a futile hope to repeal a law that isn't going to be repealed. It proves that Cruz has no idea how to get along with other people. It's his way, or no way.
I am one of those people who do see stubbornness as a bad thing. And "for the good of the country" and "compromise" has for far too often meant that progressives expect people who disagree with them to roll over and accept whatever crumbs they graciously are willing to give them.
Committing the same mistakes is no solution. Getting a reasonable conservative into the White House who knows how to govern and lead is the solution. Trying to force our way in with a lunatic whose adult behavior in the 21st century mirrors his take-over-the-world goals expressed as a teenager, who stands minimal chance of defeating the Democrats, is not the way to go.
Obama is the same freaking way Again progressive see compromise as "getting what I want, and you can save face some how".
I still don't see how Cruz can be labelled a "lunatic" without realizing that the label is nothing but a progressive construct, which is aided by more establishment republicans.
anyone that stands up and PRETENDS to be conducting a filibuster, and talks about his poor daddy, is indeed a lunatic.
So that one event makes him "crazy"?
No, it's the other way around. Being a lunatic makes him do things like filibuster the government into a shutdown in a futile hope to repeal a law that isn't going to be repealed. It proves that Cruz has no idea how to get along with other people. It's his way, or no way.
I am one of those people who do see stubbornness as a bad thing. And "for the good of the country" and "compromise" has for far too often meant that progressives expect people who disagree with them to roll over and accept whatever crumbs they graciously are willing to give them.
Committing the same mistakes is no solution. Getting a reasonable conservative into the White House who knows how to govern and lead is the solution. Trying to force our way in with a lunatic whose adult behavior in the 21st century mirrors his take-over-the-world goals expressed as a teenager, who stands minimal chance of defeating the Democrats, is not the way to go.
Obama is the same freaking way Again progressive see compromise as "getting what I want, and you can save face some how".
I still don't see how Cruz can be labelled a "lunatic" without realizing that the label is nothing but a progressive construct, which is aided by more establishment republicans.
anyone that stands up and PRETENDS to be conducting a filibuster, and talks about his poor daddy, is indeed a lunatic.
I rest my case. All you guys have is a bunch of presumptions that fits a narrative, i.e. "cruz is a stinky doody head".
And then you run with it.
If Rubio drops after FL, will Cruz catch Trump?
I think if Rubio would not have been in the race, or if he had dropped out 'long ago', I think Cruz would have caught Trump. I've read quite a bit of Cruz followers claiming they will go Cruz.
The Washington establishment hates Cruz and Trump, though, which is why they want Rubio to stay in, ensuring a brokered Convention.
Obama is the same freaking way
