If Jefferson founded Republican Party in 1793, liberalism has no place in our history

Marxism is a worldview and method of societal analysis

dear, when you copy a definition from wiki you must credit them or risk going to jail!!


Here's a more practical definition that perhaps won't leave you so confused:
"Marxism is the movement founded by Karl Marx and Frederick Engels which fights for the self-emancipation of the working class,"
Marxism by Andy Blunden

So you wanna play, "who can look up more definitions of Marxism" so you can avoid defending the absurd notion that there is some sort of "American movement" to which Modern Democrats don't subscribe?

:dig:

Keep Trying, but so far your ridiculous thesis has jumped the shark of credibility if this is the best you have to offer as rebuttal.
 
the absurd notion that there is some sort of "American movement" to which Modern Democrats don't subscribe?


dear, Democrats spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb, then elected Obama, a man who had 3 libcommie parents and voted to left of Bernie Sanders. What does that teach you?
 
In fact, there is no ONE "American" worldview.

You mean our Constitution could incorporate the Nazi, Marxist, and ISIS worldview?

So, you believe that Modern Democrats do not believe in the Constitution, which you have defined as the ONLY way an American can associate with the Universe.

How do you imagine Modern Democrats, an American Political Party, cannot be American?

When an answer to this silly notion occurs to you, please share it: if nothing else it will be very amusing.
 
the absurd notion that there is some sort of "American movement" to which Modern Democrats don't subscribe?


dear, Democrats spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb, then elected Obama, a man who had 3 libcommie parents and voted to left of Bernie Sanders. What does that teach you?

It teaches me that all crazy conspiracy theories are not confined to the correct forum.
 
the absurd notion that there is some sort of "American movement" to which Modern Democrats don't subscribe?


dear, Democrats spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb, then elected Obama, a man who had 3 libcommie parents and voted to left of Bernie Sanders. What does that teach you?

It teaches me that all crazy conspiracy theories are not confined to the correct forum.

its a crazy conspiracy theory that liberals spied for Stalin and gave him the bomb??
 
In fact, there is no ONE "American" worldview.

You mean our Constitution could incorporate the Nazi, Marxist, and ISIS worldview?

you have failed to answer the question??


You mean instead of being rhetorical you really meant to be idiotic?
You had to ask? Of course he does.

if he does please show how or admit as a typical liberal you lack the IQ to defend what you say.
 
Except that the Republican Party was formed from the ashes of the Whig Party and adopted its primary points, a strong central government, national debt, doling out money from the treasury to favored corporate interests.

You're talking about Lincoln's Republican Party, not Jefferson's. Do you know the difference?

I am quite capable of differentiating between the two, yet you keep insisting the party of Lincoln, of Dole, of Bush, of Reagan is the party of Jefferson simply because of the name. The philosophy of Jefferson, who espoused a philosophy of limited government and power devolved to the states, is given mere lip service by the modern GOP.
 
The philosophy of Jefferson, who espoused a philosophy of limited government and power devolved to the states, is given mere lip service by the modern GOP.

it is?? most Republicans have signed the pledge while no Democrats have. See why we say slow?
 
The philosophy of Jefferson, who espoused a philosophy of limited government and power devolved to the states, is given mere lip service by the modern GOP.

it is?? most Republicans have signed the pledge while no Democrats have. See why we say slow?

Ohhhh a pledge, wow, not like they ever have any intention of following up. Mere lip service.
When was the last time GOPers, when they actually had the power to do so, actually shrank government?
In real terms now, not the rate of growth, but actually shrank the scope, the reach, the spending of government.

What's this "we" shit, got another mental midget sitting there helping you type?
 
With but few exceptions, the GOPers shat all over the last member of their party in congress who legitimately desired to shrink the scope of government and advance the cause of liberty.
 
When was the last time GOPers, when they actually had the power to do so, actually shrank government?

dear to reverse a 200 year trend they'd need very solid control of all 3 branches of govt plus control of press and public.
 
With but few exceptions, the GOPers shat all over the last member of their party in congress who legitimately desired to shrink the scope of government and advance the cause of liberty.

so? it can only happen when there is a big enough majority i the country to make it happen, obviously! See why we say slow?
 

Forum List

Back
Top