If it comes down between Mitt Romney (R)/Obama 2012...Who will you vote for.

[Sallow]

That's about right.

I wonder what Michelle has to say about those donuts?

Don't tell.

And cheese it on the cigs he sneaks too.

 

[HenryBHough]

Either way you get four more years of unemployment, depression and economic vandalism. I know he's getting kind of old to run but it's still possible to write in that bastion of clear and independent thinking - well, at least comparatively so - Alfred E. Neuman.

 

[Ropey]

I always get a laugh when someone creates a passionate post and then cuts it off at the knees themselves.

Worth the watch...

 

[Londoner]

Like Bush, Romney is going to pivot toward national security in order to take the focus off our dying economy. People don't get it. The War on Terrorism is coming back in 2012.

God help us because we can't afford Big Government Conservatism.

 

[Lakhota]

Like Bush, Romney is going to pivot toward national security in order to take the focus off our dying economy. People don't get it. The War on Terrorism is coming back in 2012.

God help us because we can't afford Big Government Conservatism.

Amen!

 

[Oddball]

Like Bush, Romney is going to pivot toward national security in order to take the focus off our dying economy. People don't get it. The War on Terrorism is coming back in 2012.

God help us because we can't afford Big Government Conservatism.

As though big gubmint socialism is any more affordable?

BTW, what has Barry Obolshevik done to pare back the sham War on "Terrorism", besides jack shit?

Meet the new boss..........

 

[earlycuyler]

Just what does this prove? Did he run off to Canada to evade the draft? Did he break any laws? When he was 1-A did they attempt to draft him?

So, can we now agree that Bill Clinton was not a draft dodger...?

Please show me where I claimed Clinton was a draft dodger.

I said Clinton was a draft dodger, and that Al Gore's Daddy kept him out of the shit.

 

[Avatar4321]

Like Bush, Romney is going to pivot toward national security in order to take the focus off our dying economy. People don't get it. The War on Terrorism is coming back in 2012.

God help us because we can't afford Big Government Conservatism.

The War on Terror hasn't stopped.

 

[Sallow]

Like Bush, Romney is going to pivot toward national security in order to take the focus off our dying economy. People don't get it. The War on Terrorism is coming back in 2012.

God help us because we can't afford Big Government Conservatism.

As though big gubmint socialism is any more affordable?

BTW, what has Barry Obolshevik done to pare back the sham War on "Terrorism", besides jack shit?

Meet the new boss..........

All governments have some socialism.

What they don't have is the Anarchy you crave.

Check out Somalia for a spell. Your utopia might not be all you think it is.

 

[Lakhota]

So, can we now agree that Bill Clinton was not a draft dodger...?

Please show me where I claimed Clinton was a draft dodger.

I said Clinton was a draft dodger, and that Al Gore's Daddy kept him out of the shit.

Well, if Clinton was a draft dodger, Romney and Cain certainly were also.

 

[Sallow]

So, can we now agree that Bill Clinton was not a draft dodger...?

Please show me where I claimed Clinton was a draft dodger.

I said Clinton was a draft dodger, and that Al Gore's Daddy kept him out of the shit.

Except Clinton eventually registered. And Gore went to 'Nam, chief.

 

[Sallow]

Like Bush, Romney is going to pivot toward national security in order to take the focus off our dying economy. People don't get it. The War on Terrorism is coming back in 2012.

God help us because we can't afford Big Government Conservatism.

As though big gubmint socialism is any more affordable?

BTW, what has Barry Obolshevik done to pare back the sham War on "Terrorism", besides jack shit?

Meet the new boss..........

Well, Obama turned the fight..into a spook war..which it should have been in the first place.

Unlike the Bushies..who were funding Bin Laden for quite some time. They were even doing direct business with them. As in joint business ventures.

And that's no way to off a terrorist.

Heck..George HW Bush pardoned Orlando Bosch..didn't he?

 

[Oddball]

Like Bush, Romney is going to pivot toward national security in order to take the focus off our dying economy. People don't get it. The War on Terrorism is coming back in 2012.

God help us because we can't afford Big Government Conservatism.

As though big gubmint socialism is any more affordable?

BTW, what has Barry Obolshevik done to pare back the sham War on "Terrorism", besides jack shit?

Meet the new boss..........

Well, Obama turned the fight..into a spook war..which it should have been in the first place.

Unlike the Bushies..who were funding Bin Laden for quite some time. They were even doing direct business with them. As in joint business ventures.

And that's no way to off a terrorist.

Heck..George HW Bush pardoned Orlando Bosch..didn't he?

blablablablablabla

Nope, not a dime's worth of difference.

 

[earlycuyler]

Please show me where I claimed Clinton was a draft dodger.

I said Clinton was a draft dodger, and that Al Gore's Daddy kept him out of the shit.

Except Clinton eventually registered. And Gore went to 'Nam, chief.

He did, he was not drafted and his Daddy kept him out of the shit and got his tour cut short to. It was common for men with money to dodge the draft. Bill Clinton and all the others who dodged the draft have normally been considered hero for doing it. Why the hate for Mit and Cain ?

 

[Sallow]

I said Clinton was a draft dodger, and that Al Gore's Daddy kept him out of the shit.

Except Clinton eventually registered. And Gore went to 'Nam, chief.

He did, he was not drafted and his Daddy kept him out of the shit and got his tour cut short to. It was common for men with money to dodge the draft. Bill Clinton and all the others who dodged the draft have normally been considered hero for doing it. Why the hate for Mit and Cain ?

Again..Gore was in Vietnam. He did his time.

And I have nothing against anyone who avoided that shithole. Well unless they supported it..then were personally against going.

 

[Sallow]

As though big gubmint socialism is any more affordable?

BTW, what has Barry Obolshevik done to pare back the sham War on "Terrorism", besides jack shit?

Meet the new boss..........

Well, Obama turned the fight..into a spook war..which it should have been in the first place.

Unlike the Bushies..who were funding Bin Laden for quite some time. They were even doing direct business with them. As in joint business ventures.

And that's no way to off a terrorist.

Heck..George HW Bush pardoned Orlando Bosch..didn't he?

blablablablablabla

Nope, not a dime's worth of difference.

Last of the V-8 interceptors, mate!

 

[earlycuyler]

Except Clinton eventually registered. And Gore went to 'Nam, chief.

He did, he was not drafted and his Daddy kept him out of the shit and got his tour cut short to. It was common for men with money to dodge the draft. Bill Clinton and all the others who dodged the draft have normally been considered hero for doing it. Why the hate for Mit and Cain ?

Again..Gore was in Vietnam. He did his time.

And I have nothing against anyone who avoided that shithole. Well unless they supported it..then were personally against going.

I agree, but it is stupid to call one out for using power and money to get into or out of a given situation. Gore going was nothing more then preparation for politics, and window dressing for the ol'man's political career. I dont hold it against them, its the way it is.

 

[Amelia]

For all those people who are saying there's not a dime's worth of difference between Obama and Romney ---

There is at least a dime's worth of difference.

Even if the difference is only marginal, as some claim, it's a very important margin. Like the difference between slightly overfishing and slightly underfishing a tuna population. (Picture vector fields from your differential equations class.)

The question is who keeps us on the safe side of the equilibrium line in this very fragile economy. I think one does and the other doesn't.

Generally I think it's the Republican candidate who will be found on the safe side because generally the Republican won't be so tempted by unaffordable social programs.

However, I understand why people would think that it's Obama, due to his belief in keeping the economy afloat by more spending now and putting off doing anything about the deficit.

I understand why people would be afraid of a Republican president making the economy contract too sharply under the influence of the Tea Party and Grover Norquist.

That's why I take heart in Romney's version of conservatism. I think he will make sound decisions, decisions influenced by promises he made to the Tea Party, but not too radical. "Conservatives" who want to veer sharply toward the ideal are a little too radical for me. Moderation is more truly conservative than "conservatives" these days. "Conservatives" seem to want big changes and they want them now. I don't want the boat to be rocked too fast.

Make progress in the margins. Don't make seismic changes. Implement a few good fundamentals like in Romney's plan for Day 1 and then let people get to work. Don't keep tinkering tinkering tinkering like Obama is inclined to do.



That's why I'm not just choosing Romney over Obama as the lesser of two evils. I'm choosing Romney over anyone as the most reasonable candidate in the field on either side, with the right skill set for the challenge facing this nation.

 

[Sallow]

He did, he was not drafted and his Daddy kept him out of the shit and got his tour cut short to. It was common for men with money to dodge the draft. Bill Clinton and all the others who dodged the draft have normally been considered hero for doing it. Why the hate for Mit and Cain ?

Again..Gore was in Vietnam. He did his time.

And I have nothing against anyone who avoided that shithole. Well unless they supported it..then were personally against going.

I agree, but it is stupid to call one out for using power and money to get into or out of a given situation. Gore going was nothing more then preparation for politics, and window dressing for the ol'man's political career. I dont hold it against them, its the way it is.

I think we are of the same mind on this one..

 

[Sallow]

For all those people who are saying there's not a dime's worth of difference between Obama and Romney ---

There is at least a dime's worth of difference.

Even if the difference is only marginal, as some claim, it's a very important margin. Like the difference between slightly overfishing and slightly underfishing a tuna population. (Picture vector fields from your differential equations class.)

The question is who keeps us on the safe side of the equilibrium line in this very fragile economy. I think one does and the other doesn't.

Generally I think it's the Republican candidate who will be found on the safe side because generally the Republican won't be so tempted by unaffordable social programs.

However, I understand why people would think that it's Obama, due to his belief in keeping the economy afloat by more spending now and putting off doing anything about the deficit.

I understand why people would be afraid of a Republican president making the economy contract too sharply under the influence of the Tea Party and Grover Norquist.

That's why I take heart in Romney's version of conservatism. I think he will make sound decisions, decisions influenced by promises he made to the Tea Party, but not too radical. "Conservatives" who want to veer sharply toward the ideal are a little too radical for me. Moderation is more truly conservative than "conservatives" these days. "Conservatives" seem to want big changes and they want them now. I don't want the boat to be rocked too fast.

Make progress in the margins. Don't make seismic changes. Implement a few good fundamentals like in Romney's plan for Day 1 and then let people get to work. Don't keep tinkering tinkering tinkering like Obama is inclined to do.



That's why I'm not just choosing Romney over Obama as the lesser of two evils. I'm choosing Romney over anyone as the most reasonable candidate in the field on either side, with the right skill set for the challenge facing this nation.

I don't think either is evil.

I just think Romney is anti-labor.

We can't afford another big "de-regulation, low tax" cowboy.

That's what got us into this mess.

And why it's taking so long to get us out.

I mean..what the heck is congress arguing over. A couple of lousy points on taxes for the rich? Seriously?

The want to repeal Dodd/Frank?

How many more times we gotta bail out the whole thing before conservatives realize that Reagan voodoo economics..suck.

Along with Milton Friedman.

Anyone paying attention? Greenspan said it on his way out. Bernanke, hardly a liberal, said it today as well.

Gosh.