If Iran Gets Nukes, Will Liberals Admit that Obama Made a Horrendous Mistake?

The Benefit to having had troops on both borders of Iran was easy access to opponents to the nut jobs now in power...it is much easier to infiltrate agents, weapons, information and anything else moderate Iranians would need to fight the nuts in power....but......too many libs bitched and moaned about our being over there because it is much better that isis control that territory.....

And the same libtards who want to use mental health as a background check to keep guns out of the hands of crazies here ignore the crazies in power in Iran and want to give them nuclear weapons...........libtards can't see beyond the end of their own noses and history begins for them when they wake up in the morning.........
Iran is still a little testy with us over the fact that we overthrew their elected government and installed a US puppet, and what they build is the business of no other nation.


as opposed to the soviet puppet...yes......better to have an expansionist evil communist medling and winning an election in a foreign country than to have someone who isn't going to bother the west.......and are the Iranians happier with the muslim nutjobs in charge now........or would they have been happier with a soviet backed dictator......

The world is an ugly place and you have to choose your poison sometimes.....
 
The Benefit to having had troops on both borders of Iran was easy access to opponents to the nut jobs now in power...it is much easier to infiltrate agents, weapons, information and anything else moderate Iranians would need to fight the nuts in power....but......too many libs bitched and moaned about our being over there because it is much better that isis control that territory.....

And the same libtards who want to use mental health as a background check to keep guns out of the hands of crazies here ignore the crazies in power in Iran and want to give them nuclear weapons...........libtards can't see beyond the end of their own noses and history begins for them when they wake up in the morning.........
Iran is still a little testy with us over the fact that we overthrew their elected government and installed a US puppet, and what they build is the business of no other nation.


as opposed to the soviet puppet...yes......better to have an expansionist evil communist medling and winning an election in a foreign country than to have someone who isn't going to bother the west.......and are the Iranians happier with the muslim nutjobs in charge now........or would they have been happier with a soviet backed dictator......

The world is an ugly place and you have to choose your poison sometimes.....
I never wanted democracy in the Middle East, it's a terrible idea, but you still don't get to say what another nations can or cannot build.
 
The Benefit to having had troops on both borders of Iran was easy access to opponents to the nut jobs now in power...it is much easier to infiltrate agents, weapons, information and anything else moderate Iranians would need to fight the nuts in power....but......too many libs bitched and moaned about our being over there because it is much better that isis control that territory.....

And the same libtards who want to use mental health as a background check to keep guns out of the hands of crazies here ignore the crazies in power in Iran and want to give them nuclear weapons...........libtards can't see beyond the end of their own noses and history begins for them when they wake up in the morning.........
Iran is still a little testy with us over the fact that we overthrew their elected government and installed a US puppet, and what they build is the business of no other nation.


as opposed to the soviet puppet...yes......better to have an expansionist evil communist medling and winning an election in a foreign country than to have someone who isn't going to bother the west.......and are the Iranians happier with the muslim nutjobs in charge now........or would they have been happier with a soviet backed dictator......

The world is an ugly place and you have to choose your poison sometimes.....
I never wanted democracy in the Middle East, it's a terrible idea, but you still don't get to say what another nations can or cannot build.


Yet you seem to be one of the people who want to do it on an individual basis here as far as guns are concerned...and nuclear weapons will kill a lot more people than guns do.......
 
The Benefit to having had troops on both borders of Iran was easy access to opponents to the nut jobs now in power...it is much easier to infiltrate agents, weapons, information and anything else moderate Iranians would need to fight the nuts in power....but......too many libs bitched and moaned about our being over there because it is much better that isis control that territory.....

And the same libtards who want to use mental health as a background check to keep guns out of the hands of crazies here ignore the crazies in power in Iran and want to give them nuclear weapons...........libtards can't see beyond the end of their own noses and history begins for them when they wake up in the morning.........
Iran is still a little testy with us over the fact that we overthrew their elected government and installed a US puppet, and what they build is the business of no other nation.


as opposed to the soviet puppet...yes......better to have an expansionist evil communist medling and winning an election in a foreign country than to have someone who isn't going to bother the west.......and are the Iranians happier with the muslim nutjobs in charge now........or would they have been happier with a soviet backed dictator......

The world is an ugly place and you have to choose your poison sometimes.....
I never wanted democracy in the Middle East, it's a terrible idea, but you still don't get to say what another nations can or cannot build.


Who are you kidding...you don't want democracy here........
 
The Benefit to having had troops on both borders of Iran was easy access to opponents to the nut jobs now in power...it is much easier to infiltrate agents, weapons, information and anything else moderate Iranians would need to fight the nuts in power....but......too many libs bitched and moaned about our being over there because it is much better that isis control that territory.....

And the same libtards who want to use mental health as a background check to keep guns out of the hands of crazies here ignore the crazies in power in Iran and want to give them nuclear weapons...........libtards can't see beyond the end of their own noses and history begins for them when they wake up in the morning.........
Iran is still a little testy with us over the fact that we overthrew their elected government and installed a US puppet, and what they build is the business of no other nation.


as opposed to the soviet puppet...yes......better to have an expansionist evil communist medling and winning an election in a foreign country than to have someone who isn't going to bother the west.......and are the Iranians happier with the muslim nutjobs in charge now........or would they have been happier with a soviet backed dictator......

The world is an ugly place and you have to choose your poison sometimes.....
I never wanted democracy in the Middle East, it's a terrible idea, but you still don't get to say what another nations can or cannot build.


Who are you kidding...you don't want democracy here........
Here or there. And we aren't a democracy here. Democracy is mob rule. Pass on that.
 
Bill Clinton paved the way for North Korea to develop nuclear weapons and how much outrage did that generate. The sad fact of life is that the mainstream media will always circle the wagons around a democrat administration and pretend that outrages never happened.
 
The Benefit to having had troops on both borders of Iran was easy access to opponents to the nut jobs now in power...it is much easier to infiltrate agents, weapons, information and anything else moderate Iranians would need to fight the nuts in power....but......too many libs bitched and moaned about our being over there because it is much better that isis control that territory.....

And the same libtards who want to use mental health as a background check to keep guns out of the hands of crazies here ignore the crazies in power in Iran and want to give them nuclear weapons...........libtards can't see beyond the end of their own noses and history begins for them when they wake up in the morning.........
Iran is still a little testy with us over the fact that we overthrew their elected government and installed a US puppet, and what they build is the business of no other nation.


as opposed to the soviet puppet...yes......better to have an expansionist evil communist medling and winning an election in a foreign country than to have someone who isn't going to bother the west.......and are the Iranians happier with the muslim nutjobs in charge now........or would they have been happier with a soviet backed dictator......

The world is an ugly place and you have to choose your poison sometimes.....
I never wanted democracy in the Middle East, it's a terrible idea, but you still don't get to say what another nations can or cannot build.


Yet you seem to be one of the people who want to do it on an individual basis here as far as guns are concerned...and nuclear weapons will kill a lot more people than guns do.......
Yes, but no one has used a nuke, as a weapon, in seven decades. Can't go seven minutes here without a gun death.
 
Libs want equality. All the violent dictator scumbag nations should have nuclear capability, they insist, since we do.

PaintMyDogHouse and Opium are two peas in a pod. Lib lemmings with no chance of a useful thought emerging between the two of them. Ever.
 
Libs want equality. All the violent dictator scumbag nations should have nuclear capability, they insist, since we do.

PaintMyDogHouse and Opium are two peas in a pod. Lib lemmings with no chance of a useful thought emerging between the two of them. Ever.
Your continued name-calling, without any other substance, isn't helping your case.
 
Libs want equality. All the violent dictator scumbag nations should have nuclear capability, they insist, since we do.

PaintMyDogHouse and Opium are two peas in a pod. Lib lemmings with no chance of a useful thought emerging between the two of them. Ever.
Your continued name-calling, without any other substance, isn't helping your case.

Your continued ineffectual whining about name calling and some off color language isn't exactly bolstering your sub moronic position either, ya shit for brain motherfucking pussy.
 
Libs want equality. All the violent dictator scumbag nations should have nuclear capability, they insist, since we do.

PaintMyDogHouse and Opium are two peas in a pod. Lib lemmings with no chance of a useful thought emerging between the two of them. Ever.
Your continued name-calling, without any other substance, isn't helping your case.

Your continued ineffectual whining about name calling and some off color language isn't exactly bolstering your sub moronic position either, ya shit for brain motherfucking pussy.
Go play little one, you bore me.
 
Libs want equality. All the violent dictator scumbag nations should have nuclear capability, they insist, since we do.

PaintMyDogHouse and Opium are two peas in a pod. Lib lemmings with no chance of a useful thought emerging between the two of them. Ever.
Your continued name-calling, without any other substance, isn't helping your case.

Your continued ineffectual whining about name calling and some off color language isn't exactly bolstering your sub moronic position either, ya shit for brain motherfucking pussy.
Go play little one, you bore me.

Go fuck yourself, you douche bag. You ARE a bore.

If you post more of your standard worthless bullshit babble, and I wish to expose your sub-par intellect on an ongoing basis, you get no vote in the matter. :thup:

Free speech really irks you laughable modern American lolberals, eh what?
 
Libs want equality. All the violent dictator scumbag nations should have nuclear capability, they insist, since we do.

PaintMyDogHouse and Opium are two peas in a pod. Lib lemmings with no chance of a useful thought emerging between the two of them. Ever.
Your continued name-calling, without any other substance, isn't helping your case.

Your continued ineffectual whining about name calling and some off color language isn't exactly bolstering your sub moronic position either, ya shit for brain motherfucking pussy.
Go play little one, you bore me.

Go fuck yourself, you douche bag. You ARE a bore.

If you post more of your standard worthless bullshit babble, and I wish to expose your sub-par intellect on an ongoing basis, you get no vote in the matter. :thup:

Free speech really irks you laughable modern American lolberals, eh what?
We invented free speech, little man. Babble away, all hearing infants do.
 
Last edited:
Libs want equality. All the violent dictator scumbag nations should have nuclear capability, they insist, since we do.

PaintMyDogHouse and Opium are two peas in a pod. Lib lemmings with no chance of a useful thought emerging between the two of them. Ever.
Your continued name-calling, without any other substance, isn't helping your case.

Your continued ineffectual whining about name calling and some off color language isn't exactly bolstering your sub moronic position either, ya shit for brain motherfucking pussy.
Go play little one, you bore me.

Go fuck yourself, you douche bag. You ARE a bore.

If you post more of your standard worthless bullshit babble, and I wish to expose your sub-par intellect on an ongoing basis, you get no vote in the matter. :thup:

Free speech really irks you laughable modern American lolberals, eh what?
We invented free speech ,little man. Babble away, all hearing infants do.

"We?" If by "we" you intend to be suggesting that you laughable lolberals "invented" free speech, then you are not just wrong and misinformed, but tragically dishonest and petty.

No shitbird. YOU didn't invent anything. And you asshole modern American liberals consistently demonstrate your loathing of free speech for those who disagree with you.

Get back to fucking yourself.
 
Casting aside his earlier, and repeated, assurances that he would never allow Iran to get nukes, Obama now supports a deal that would allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons in 10 years. If public opinion and/or Congressional action ends up forcing Obama to scale back the deal, he and John Kerry appear determined to at least allow Iran to retain the crucial capability to enrich uranium, which is the vital core of any nuclear weapons program.

Our own State Department has said that Iran is the "world's most active state sponsor of terrorism." The mullahs who run Iran not only deny the Holocaust and swear to obliterate Israel (they recently repeated that promise following Netanyahu's compelling speech to Congress), but they also believe in Twelfth Imam theology, which calls for provoking a world conflict as a necessary step in Islam's conquest of the planet.

So if Iran gets nuclear weapons in 10 years or less, will liberals be willing to admit that Obama made a horrendous, foolish, historic blunder in allowing such a dangerous, radical regime to acquire nukes?

Some reading on Iran:

Article in The Atlantic on the dangers posed by Obama's emerging nuclear deal with Iran

Council on Foreign Relations article on Iran as the world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism

Iran and 12th Imam theology

Now the 12th Imam Can Come

AJC webpage with numerous article links on the threat Iran poses to the world (the American Jewish Committee is a very liberal Jewish group)

Needless to say, if Obama had revealed in 2012 that he would support such a dangerous, risky deal with Iran, he likely would have lost to Romney. Obama has probably always favored allowing Iran to get nukes. He grew up as a Muslim for at least part of his childhood, and he associated with radical Muslims and with radical anti-Israeli activists until shortly before he ran for president in 2008. So it's not surprising that he is discarding his earlier promise to never allow Iran to get nukes.
You haven't even proven Iran is trying to get nukes. How retarded are you? If they don't get nukes, are you going to admit you were full of shit?
 
"We?" If by "we" you intend to be suggesting that you laughable lolberals "invented" free speech, then you are not just wrong and misinformed, but tragically dishonest and petty.

No shitbird. YOU didn't invent anything. And you asshole modern American liberals consistently demonstrate your loathing of free speech for those who disagree with you.

Get back to fucking yourself.
I'd be nice if you used your free speech with better grammar?
 
Your continued name-calling, without any other substance, isn't helping your case.

Your continued ineffectual whining about name calling and some off color language isn't exactly bolstering your sub moronic position either, ya shit for brain motherfucking pussy.
Go play little one, you bore me.

Go fuck yourself, you douche bag. You ARE a bore.

If you post more of your standard worthless bullshit babble, and I wish to expose your sub-par intellect on an ongoing basis, you get no vote in the matter. :thup:

Free speech really irks you laughable modern American lolberals, eh what?
We invented free speech ,little man. Babble away, all hearing infants do.

"We?" If by "we" you intend to be suggesting that you laughable lolberals "invented" free speech, then you are not just wrong and misinformed, but tragically dishonest and petty.

No shitbird. YOU didn't invent anything. And you asshole modern American liberals consistently demonstrate your loathing of free speech for those who disagree with you.

Get back to fucking yourself.
http://digitalcommons.law.umaryland.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2503&context=mlr
 
Casting aside his earlier, and repeated, assurances that he would never allow Iran to get nukes, Obama now supports a deal that would allow Iran to obtain nuclear weapons in 10 years. If public opinion and/or Congressional action ends up forcing Obama to scale back the deal, he and John Kerry appear determined to at least allow Iran to retain the crucial capability to enrich uranium, which is the vital core of any nuclear weapons program.

Our own State Department has said that Iran is the "world's most active state sponsor of terrorism." The mullahs who run Iran not only deny the Holocaust and swear to obliterate Israel (they recently repeated that promise following Netanyahu's compelling speech to Congress), but they also believe in Twelfth Imam theology, which calls for provoking a world conflict as a necessary step in Islam's conquest of the planet.

So if Iran gets nuclear weapons in 10 years or less, will liberals be willing to admit that Obama made a horrendous, foolish, historic blunder in allowing such a dangerous, radical regime to acquire nukes?

Some reading on Iran:

Article in The Atlantic on the dangers posed by Obama's emerging nuclear deal with Iran

Council on Foreign Relations article on Iran as the world's biggest state sponsor of terrorism

Iran and 12th Imam theology

Now the 12th Imam Can Come

AJC webpage with numerous article links on the threat Iran poses to the world (the American Jewish Committee is a very liberal Jewish group)

Needless to say, if Obama had revealed in 2012 that he would support such a dangerous, risky deal with Iran, he likely would have lost to Romney. Obama has probably always favored allowing Iran to get nukes. He grew up as a Muslim for at least part of his childhood, and he associated with radical Muslims and with radical anti-Israeli activists until shortly before he ran for president in 2008. So it's not surprising that he is discarding his earlier promise to never allow Iran to get nukes.
You haven't even proven Iran is trying to get nukes. How retarded are you? If they don't get nukes, are you going to admit you were full of shit?


^ classic brain-dead Dildo "thinking."

Hey Dildo-Really, you filthy mutant scumbag asshole, try to think for once.

If Iran is seeking to develop the ability to produce nuclear weapons capability, do you not imagine that they might wish to keep that fact at least un-admitted? Has anyone ever broached the notion of "state secret" with you in your idiot-universe?

Then again, if they aren't seeking to develop that capability, then why are they so insistent on maintaining the RIGHT to do so?

And why do YOU even ask your fake question -- other than your transparent attempt to deflect? It is not truly disputed that they ARE trying to develop the capability. YOU even defend them as having a by-Allah RIGHT to do so.

Make up your mind, ya pinhead.
 
"We?" If by "we" you intend to be suggesting that you laughable lolberals "invented" free speech, then you are not just wrong and misinformed, but tragically dishonest and petty.

No shitbird. YOU didn't invent anything. And you asshole modern American liberals consistently demonstrate your loathing of free speech for those who disagree with you.

Get back to fucking yourself.
I'd be nice if you used your free speech with better grammar?

It would be nice if you'd use your right to free speech to say anything at least with a glimmer of intelligence.

By the way, my use of colorful invective is not bad grammar either, you ignorant whining sack of stupid.
 

Forum List

Back
Top