If Hillary is indicted......

[Wildman]

If Hillary (aka "Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky") is indicted

if Hillary (aka Hitlery) is indicted.., will the demorats and libertards start a massive Jim "Kool-Aid" Jones party?

let's hope so!

 

[Wildman]

well done mice?

she is above mice, she runs with rats.., demoRATS

 

[Rexx Taylor]

well done mice?

she is above mice, she runs with rats.., demoRATS

i like well done mice on my pizza,,,tastes like real pepperoni

 

[Roudy]

Vladimir Lenin would be another great write-in for Democrats, if he's not available then Mussolini is on stand-by.

 

[Pogo]

If Hillary (aka "Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky") is indicted will The Democrat Party nominate Michael Moore?

If not, why not?

Bernie will do. The only way you might win is if we nominate O'Malley.

We won't elect a lefty who has zero experience like carli Ben carson or Herman Cain.

Um you did. his name was Barack obama

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

 

[Roudy]

^^^^
Obama is far left of the most radical leftists in his party, and herein lies the problemo.

And the Democrats have decided to elect in Hillary someone just as bad as Obama. She is no moderate like her husband who compromised with the republicans in favor of the good of the country.

 

[Avatar4321]

If Hillary (aka "Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky") is indicted will The Democrat Party nominate Michael Moore?

If not, why not?

Bernie will do. The only way you might win is if we nominate O'Malley.

We won't elect a lefty who has zero experience like carli Ben carson or Herman Cain.

Um you did. his name was Barack obama

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

 

[daws101]

wake up henry you're having that dream again!

What part of "if" do you liberals find so challenging?

Is there no adult around who can sound it out for you?

There is no if , shit happens or it doesn't.

 

[Pogo]

If Hillary (aka "Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky") is indicted will The Democrat Party nominate Michael Moore?

If not, why not?

Bernie will do. The only way you might win is if we nominate O'Malley.

We won't elect a lefty who has zero experience like carli Ben carson or Herman Cain.

Um you did. his name was Barack obama

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up. O'bama had 12 years in gummint, Romney had four. Cruz doesn't even have three yet. So much for that BS "inexperience" argument; can't have it both ways.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right. If you're standing in Ohio, Indiana is "west".

 

[sealybobo]

If Hillary (aka "Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky") is indicted will The Democrat Party nominate Michael Moore?

If not, why not?

Bernie will do. The only way you might win is if we nominate O'Malley.

We won't elect a lefty who has zero experience like carli Ben carson or Herman Cain.

Um you did. his name was Barack obama

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right.

They said the exact same thing about Bill Clinton and we all can look back and see clearly he was not a liberal, progressive or lefty. He was a centrist moderate corporate democrat almost no better than the GOP in some ways. It's what us liberals fear about nominating Hillary and Obama has been a centrist too.

I don't mind. I think they have to be or they'll only be a 1 term president. Democrats have to go along with the rich and corporations that own our country too. If they don't they end up being Jimmy Carter or Bernie Sanders. And I'd rather a centrist corporate Democrat than a moderate Republican.

AND, I don't think the American people even deserve a liberal progressive government. If they did Michigan, formerly a union state, would have never elected a Republican governor.

 

[Pogo]

Bernie will do. The only way you might win is if we nominate O'Malley.

We won't elect a lefty who has zero experience like carli Ben carson or Herman Cain.

Um you did. his name was Barack obama

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right.

They said the exact same thing about Bill Clinton and we all can look back and see clearly he was not a liberal, progressive or lefty. He was a centrist moderate corporate democrat almost no better than the GOP in some ways. It's what us liberals fear about nominating Hillary and Obama has been a centrist too.

I don't mind. I think they have to be or they'll only be a 1 term president. Democrats have to go along with the rich and corporations that own our country too. If they don't they end up being Jimmy Carter or Bernie Sanders. And I'd rather a centrist corporate Democrat than a moderate Republican.

AND, I don't think the American people even deserve a liberal progressive government. If they did Michigan, formerly a union state, would have never elected a Republican governor.

Eh -- well, Michigan's got a lotta gullible rednecks in the hinterlands. Ted Whatzisname's people, you know, poopy pants.

Fully agree on the Clinton read. When Democrats came crawling out of the woodwork in '92 to run against HW is about when I got really interested. I ranked 'em all for personal preference, and Clinton was dead last. But somebody had to take HW out, so when election time came Bull came through with the only thing he's any good at -- campaigning and winning an election. Once that was done I wasn't one of those voices "disappointed" with him, since I hadn't expected he'd be good for anything else. In effect all we did was slow down the bleeding by replacing a corrupt destructive puppet with a jellyfish negligent puppet.

 

[sealybobo]

Um you did. his name was Barack obama

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right.

They said the exact same thing about Bill Clinton and we all can look back and see clearly he was not a liberal, progressive or lefty. He was a centrist moderate corporate democrat almost no better than the GOP in some ways. It's what us liberals fear about nominating Hillary and Obama has been a centrist too.

I don't mind. I think they have to be or they'll only be a 1 term president. Democrats have to go along with the rich and corporations that own our country too. If they don't they end up being Jimmy Carter or Bernie Sanders. And I'd rather a centrist corporate Democrat than a moderate Republican.

AND, I don't think the American people even deserve a liberal progressive government. If they did Michigan, formerly a union state, would have never elected a Republican governor.

Eh -- well, Michigan's got a lotta gullible rednecks in the hinterlands. Ted Whatzisname's people, you know, poopy pants.

Fully agree on the Clinton read. When Democrats came crawling out of the woodwork in '92 to run against HW is about when I got really interested. I ranked 'em all for personal preference, and Clinton was dead last. But somebody had to take HW out, so when election time came Bull came through with the only thing he's any good at -- campaigning and winning an election. Once that was done I wasn't one of those voices "disappointed" with him, since I hadn't expected he'd be good for anything else. In effect all we did was slow down the bleeding by replacing a corrupt destructive puppet with a jellyfish negligent puppet.

So you would like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as his running mate? Me too.

 

[Pogo]

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right.

They said the exact same thing about Bill Clinton and we all can look back and see clearly he was not a liberal, progressive or lefty. He was a centrist moderate corporate democrat almost no better than the GOP in some ways. It's what us liberals fear about nominating Hillary and Obama has been a centrist too.

I don't mind. I think they have to be or they'll only be a 1 term president. Democrats have to go along with the rich and corporations that own our country too. If they don't they end up being Jimmy Carter or Bernie Sanders. And I'd rather a centrist corporate Democrat than a moderate Republican.

AND, I don't think the American people even deserve a liberal progressive government. If they did Michigan, formerly a union state, would have never elected a Republican governor.

Eh -- well, Michigan's got a lotta gullible rednecks in the hinterlands. Ted Whatzisname's people, you know, poopy pants.

Fully agree on the Clinton read. When Democrats came crawling out of the woodwork in '92 to run against HW is about when I got really interested. I ranked 'em all for personal preference, and Clinton was dead last. But somebody had to take HW out, so when election time came Bull came through with the only thing he's any good at -- campaigning and winning an election. Once that was done I wasn't one of those voices "disappointed" with him, since I hadn't expected he'd be good for anything else. In effect all we did was slow down the bleeding by replacing a corrupt destructive puppet with a jellyfish negligent puppet.

So you would like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as his running mate? Me too.

Sure beats anything I've heard up to this point.
But there's time for that -- it's still clown time on the stage right now.

 

[Roudy]

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right.

They said the exact same thing about Bill Clinton and we all can look back and see clearly he was not a liberal, progressive or lefty. He was a centrist moderate corporate democrat almost no better than the GOP in some ways. It's what us liberals fear about nominating Hillary and Obama has been a centrist too.

I don't mind. I think they have to be or they'll only be a 1 term president. Democrats have to go along with the rich and corporations that own our country too. If they don't they end up being Jimmy Carter or Bernie Sanders. And I'd rather a centrist corporate Democrat than a moderate Republican.

AND, I don't think the American people even deserve a liberal progressive government. If they did Michigan, formerly a union state, would have never elected a Republican governor.

Eh -- well, Michigan's got a lotta gullible rednecks in the hinterlands. Ted Whatzisname's people, you know, poopy pants.

Fully agree on the Clinton read. When Democrats came crawling out of the woodwork in '92 to run against HW is about when I got really interested. I ranked 'em all for personal preference, and Clinton was dead last. But somebody had to take HW out, so when election time came Bull came through with the only thing he's any good at -- campaigning and winning an election. Once that was done I wasn't one of those voices "disappointed" with him, since I hadn't expected he'd be good for anything else. In effect all we did was slow down the bleeding by replacing a corrupt destructive puppet with a jellyfish negligent puppet.

So you would like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as his running mate? Me too.

Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will be a good choice for the Democrats. Then they can blame all the world's problems on the evil USA and Global Warming oops sorry Climate Change.

 

[daws101]

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right.

They said the exact same thing about Bill Clinton and we all can look back and see clearly he was not a liberal, progressive or lefty. He was a centrist moderate corporate democrat almost no better than the GOP in some ways. It's what us liberals fear about nominating Hillary and Obama has been a centrist too.

I don't mind. I think they have to be or they'll only be a 1 term president. Democrats have to go along with the rich and corporations that own our country too. If they don't they end up being Jimmy Carter or Bernie Sanders. And I'd rather a centrist corporate Democrat than a moderate Republican.

AND, I don't think the American people even deserve a liberal progressive government. If they did Michigan, formerly a union state, would have never elected a Republican governor.

Eh -- well, Michigan's got a lotta gullible rednecks in the hinterlands. Ted Whatzisname's people, you know, poopy pants.

Fully agree on the Clinton read. When Democrats came crawling out of the woodwork in '92 to run against HW is about when I got really interested. I ranked 'em all for personal preference, and Clinton was dead last. But somebody had to take HW out, so when election time came Bull came through with the only thing he's any good at -- campaigning and winning an election. Once that was done I wasn't one of those voices "disappointed" with him, since I hadn't expected he'd be good for anything else. In effect all we did was slow down the bleeding by replacing a corrupt destructive puppet with a jellyfish negligent puppet.

So you would like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as his running mate? Me too.

Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will be a good choice for the Democrats. Then they can blame all the world's problems on the evil USA and Global Warming oops sorry Climate Change.

as opposed to ted cruz who would blame the world's problems on heathen non believers.

 

[sealybobo]

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right.

They said the exact same thing about Bill Clinton and we all can look back and see clearly he was not a liberal, progressive or lefty. He was a centrist moderate corporate democrat almost no better than the GOP in some ways. It's what us liberals fear about nominating Hillary and Obama has been a centrist too.

I don't mind. I think they have to be or they'll only be a 1 term president. Democrats have to go along with the rich and corporations that own our country too. If they don't they end up being Jimmy Carter or Bernie Sanders. And I'd rather a centrist corporate Democrat than a moderate Republican.

AND, I don't think the American people even deserve a liberal progressive government. If they did Michigan, formerly a union state, would have never elected a Republican governor.

Eh -- well, Michigan's got a lotta gullible rednecks in the hinterlands. Ted Whatzisname's people, you know, poopy pants.

Fully agree on the Clinton read. When Democrats came crawling out of the woodwork in '92 to run against HW is about when I got really interested. I ranked 'em all for personal preference, and Clinton was dead last. But somebody had to take HW out, so when election time came Bull came through with the only thing he's any good at -- campaigning and winning an election. Once that was done I wasn't one of those voices "disappointed" with him, since I hadn't expected he'd be good for anything else. In effect all we did was slow down the bleeding by replacing a corrupt destructive puppet with a jellyfish negligent puppet.

So you would like Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren as his running mate? Me too.

Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will be a good choice for the Democrats. Then they can blame all the world's problems on the evil USA and Global Warming oops sorry Climate Change.

Coming from a person who thinks liberals and progressives are the ones destroying America.

Government Spends More on Corporate Welfare Subsidies than Social Welfare Programs

It isn't bad enough that corporations own our country but its even worse when Republicans approve of them owning us.

Why do they think corporations have the power? If Ford wants to go to Mexico, don't let them ship cars back in. Problem solved. If corporations don't want to pay taxes and move to the Cayman Islands, don't allow them to move to the Cayman Islands.

 

[Redfish]

1000 e-mails containing classified government information and data transmitted over an unsecure server. HRC is done.

 

[daws101]

1000 e-mails containing classified government information and data transmitted over an unsecure server. HRC is done.

if that were even remotely true she'd be in the slammer already....
please no fantasy about controlling the laws.

 

[Syriusly]

If Hillary (aka "Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky") is indicted will The Democrat Party nominate Michael Moore?

If not, why not?

If Trump is indicted with the RNC nominate Michelle Bachmann?

 

[Avatar4321]

If Hillary (aka "Mrs. Rodham-Clinton/Lewinsky") is indicted will The Democrat Party nominate Michael Moore?

If not, why not?

Bernie will do. The only way you might win is if we nominate O'Malley.

We won't elect a lefty who has zero experience like carli Ben carson or Herman Cain.

Um you did. his name was Barack obama

If O'bama actually were a "lefty" and didn't have three times as much experience as, say, Mitt Cruz or Ted Romney, that post might actually be valid.

He didn't and he is

Oh yes he did, and I mean before taking POTUS office. Look it up. O'bama had 12 years in gummint, Romney had four. Cruz doesn't even have three yet. So much for that BS "inexperience" argument; can't have it both ways.

And no, if you think O'bama is a "lefty" you must live in a world of Right. If you're standing in Ohio, Indiana is "west".

We are talking leadership experience. Obama had zero when he was elected and his performance demonstrates a very slow learning curve.

I know a guy who has worked for the government for 20 years. He has some mental issues and cleans toilets. By your logic since he works for government he is more qualified than Obama.

Sadly that may be accurate but not because of the logic but because Obama has been that bad