IDF demolishes home of Shlomit Krigman murderer

[Boston1]

IDF destroys home of Shlomit Krigman's murderer

Quote
IDF engineers accompanied by Border Police forces and the Civil Administration destroyed last night the home of Hussein Mohammed Abu Gosh, the terrorist who along with an accomplice murdered Israeli woman Shlomit Krigman in an attack on a supermarket in Beit Horon.

During the demolition operation local Arab residents rioted, hurling rocks, firebombs, cinderblocks and improvised explosives at Israeli forces. Two solders were lightly wounded as a result, and are being treated at Hadassah Ein Kerem hospital.

IDF forces responded first with non-lethal riot control weapons, but were eventually forces to use live fire against several main instigators of the violent attacks. A number of hits were identified.

Krigman was stabbed to death in the attack in January, which also left another 23-year-old woman seriously injured.

End Quote

How anyone, even a Nazi, could kill such a beautiful young woman is beyond me.

May she now rest in peace

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Well done Israel, well done

 

[Humanity]

How anyone, even a Nazi, could kill such a beautiful young woman is beyond me.

I didn't know that the bastard murderers of this lady were card carrying members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party...

 

[DGS49]

It's all about "deterrence," isn't it? If a would-be terrorist killer knows that his family will be punished after he has died, it may deter him from carrying out this sort of mission.

But even if it doesn't, isn't it fun?

 

[Hollie]

How anyone, even a Nazi, could kill such a beautiful young woman is beyond me.

I didn't know that the bastard murderers of this lady were card carrying members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party...

They're not. They're koran carrying members of the Retrograde Cult of Islamic Fascists.

 

[Boston1]

It's all about "deterrence," isn't it? If a would-be terrorist killer knows that his family will be punished after he has died, it may deter him from carrying out this sort of mission.

But even if it doesn't, isn't it fun?

Inaccurate. One of the concepts here is the culture of aiding and abetting, The Arab Muslims in Israel have developed their recent culture surrounding venerating terrorism. The kids grow up with posters of dead terrorists on the walls and going to terrorist camps at the UN compounds.

As such the parents and relatives have gone far beyond inciting the violent acts of the family member but actively supported an enemy combatant. Which is considered a hostile act.

As the Geneva Conventions clearly specify those suspected of aiding the enemy are considered combatants and may be subject to both judicial and military action.

I fully support not just the room of a terrorist being destroyed but the entire home. All of it, since its inhabitants inevitably assisted in the act of terrorism

 

[Humanity]

How anyone, even a Nazi, could kill such a beautiful young woman is beyond me.

I didn't know that the bastard murderers of this lady were card carrying members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party...

They're not. They're koran carrying members of the Retrograde Cult of Islamic Fascists.

Ah, so they aren't Nazi's then....

Thanks for the clarification!

 

[montelatici]

Besides being a war crime for which Nazis were convicted under Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 1 Charter of the International Military Tribunal
Article 6(b) and in contravention Article 53 of the Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 for which Serbians are being sought to be tried by the ICC for having behaved similarly vis-a-vis the Bosnians, I guess if it works, have at it.

 

[Boston1]

Besides being a war crime for which Nazis were convicted under Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 1 Charter of the International Military Tribunal
Article 6(b) and in contravention Article 53 of the Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 for which Serbians are being sought to be tried by the ICC for having behaved similarly vis-a-vis the Bosnians, I guess if it works, have at it.

LOL you're cherry picking again. The conventions clearly specify who is a combatant and who are protected persons.

Anyone assisting or suspected of assisting enemy combatants loses their protected status and is an enemy combatant.

Are you really so slow that after all those times I quoted the exact passages you still just don't get it ?

The buildings terrorist use to plan their terrorist acts are military targets. Israel also has jurisdiction to impose court ordered sanctions for offenders.

;--)

 

[montelatici]

I think it is clear who doesn't get it. Unfortunately for you, perpetrators have already been convicted, including via the Nuremberg trials, for exactly what Israel is now doing, so your dog won't hunt.

After the assassination of the civilian governor of Bohemia and Moravia, Reinhard Heydrich by Czech "terrorists", as the Nazis called the partisans, the homes of the families of the terrorists were demolished.

 

[Boston1]

So you're saying that if your fellow Nazi's can't do it legally how does Israel manage to do it legally ?

Its simple. International law. The Geneva Conventions clearly give Israeli courts jurisdiction within the disputed territories. The courts have decided, not some individual as occurred in your example.

You really don't know history very well do you ?

 

[Penelope]

It's all about "deterrence," isn't it? If a would-be terrorist killer knows that his family will be punished after he has died, it may deter him from carrying out this sort of mission.

But even if it doesn't, isn't it fun?

Inaccurate. One of the concepts here is the culture of aiding and abetting, The Arab Muslims in Israel have developed their recent culture surrounding venerating terrorism. The kids grow up with posters of dead terrorists on the walls and going to terrorist camps at the UN compounds.

As such the parents and relatives have gone far beyond inciting the violent acts of the family member but actively supported an enemy combatant. Which is considered a hostile act.

As the Geneva Conventions clearly specify those suspected of aiding the enemy are considered combatants and may be subject to both judicial and military action.

I fully support not just the room of a terrorist being destroyed but the entire home. All of it, since its inhabitants inevitably assisted in the act of terrorism

Gee maybe we should do that in the US, what do you think. Obviously families know if their members are terrorists. If we destroyed Israel terrorist many Israelites would be homeless.

 

[montelatici]

So you're saying that if your fellow Nazi's can't do it legally how does Israel manage to do it legally ?

Its simple. International law. The Geneva Conventions clearly give Israeli courts jurisdiction within the disputed territories. The courts have decided, not some individual as occurred in your example.

You really don't know history very well do you ?

I know history far too well for you, which is why you are constantly made a fool of. Your Israeli latter day Nazi buddies, the Israelis are breaking international law, that's just a fact.

It was not an individual that determined that homes would be demolished, it was the determination of the military courts in Nazi occupied Czechoslovakia.

 

[Penelope]

How many do we know here in the US that do terrible things and the family and neighbors had no idea, even co workers are surprised. Israel is just doing this to piss off the arabs even more to justify their criminal acts against the Arabs, See poor us, I still believe this was a false flag. A reason to destroy more homes, bomb Gaza, and build more settlements as "punitive damage". Its been 2 years coming up to the summer of 2014 and Israel needs to flex their military power.

 

[Phoenall]

How anyone, even a Nazi, could kill such a beautiful young woman is beyond me.

I didn't know that the bastard murderers of this lady were card carrying members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party...

They invented the dogma so of course they are.

 

[Phoenall]

How anyone, even a Nazi, could kill such a beautiful young woman is beyond me.

I didn't know that the bastard murderers of this lady were card carrying members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party...

They're not. They're koran carrying members of the Retrograde Cult of Islamic Fascists.

Ah, so they aren't Nazi's then....

Thanks for the clarification!

Sorry but they were and as such should be tried for war crimes in the hague

 

[Phoenall]

Besides being a war crime for which Nazis were convicted under Nuremberg Trial Proceedings Vol. 1 Charter of the International Military Tribunal
Article 6(b) and in contravention Article 53 of the Geneva Convention (IV) relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in Time of War of 12 August 1949 for which Serbians are being sought to be tried by the ICC for having behaved similarly vis-a-vis the Bosnians, I guess if it works, have at it.

Of topic deflection again because you know you cant win the argument.

The topic is the destruction of buildings used by terrorists for military purposes, not the war in Serbia.

 

[Phoenall]

How many do we know here in the US that do terrible things and the family and neighbors had no idea, even co workers are surprised. Israel is just doing this to piss off the arabs even more to justify their criminal acts against the Arabs, See poor us, I still believe this was a false flag. A reason to destroy more homes, bomb Gaza, and build more settlements as "punitive damage". Its been 2 years coming up to the summer of 2014 and Israel needs to flex their military power.

Of topic rambling again, try and keep to the topic which is the destruction of buildings used by hamas terrorists for military reasons. Clearly not protected by the Geneva conventions

 

[Phoenall]

It's all about "deterrence," isn't it? If a would-be terrorist killer knows that his family will be punished after he has died, it may deter him from carrying out this sort of mission.

But even if it doesn't, isn't it fun?

Inaccurate. One of the concepts here is the culture of aiding and abetting, The Arab Muslims in Israel have developed their recent culture surrounding venerating terrorism. The kids grow up with posters of dead terrorists on the walls and going to terrorist camps at the UN compounds.

As such the parents and relatives have gone far beyond inciting the violent acts of the family member but actively supported an enemy combatant. Which is considered a hostile act.

As the Geneva Conventions clearly specify those suspected of aiding the enemy are considered combatants and may be subject to both judicial and military action.

I fully support not just the room of a terrorist being destroyed but the entire home. All of it, since its inhabitants inevitably assisted in the act of terrorism

Gee maybe we should do that in the US, what do you think. Obviously families know if their members are terrorists. If we destroyed Israel terrorist many Israelites would be homeless.

You already do, that is if you are in America and not Iran....................

 

[Boston1]

So you're saying that if your fellow Nazi's can't do it legally how does Israel manage to do it legally ?

Its simple. International law. The Geneva Conventions clearly give Israeli courts jurisdiction within the disputed territories. The courts have decided, not some individual as occurred in your example.

You really don't know history very well do you ?

I know history far too well for you, which is why you are constantly made a fool of. Your Israeli latter day Nazi buddies, the Israelis are breaking international law, that's just a fact.

It was not an individual that determined that homes would be demolished, it was the determination of the military courts in Nazi occupied Czechoslovakia.

Bull shit.

It was Hitler and Himmler who ordered the response to the assassination.

The courts had nothing to do with it. :--)

Once again you only humiliate yourself when you claim others don't have a grasp on history and then you prove your own inadequacies so blatantly.

I'll even quote your favorite source LOL
Quote

On the very day of the assassination attempt Hitler ordered an investigation and reprisals, suggesting that Himmler send SS General Erich von dem Bach-Zelewski to Prague; according to Karl Hermann Frank's postwar testimony, Hitler knew Zelewski to be even harsher than Heydrich.[26] Hitler favored killing 10,000 politically unreliable Czechs, but after he consulted Himmler, the idea was dropped because Czech territory was an important industrial zone for the German military and indiscriminate killing could reduce the productivity of the region.[27]

The Nazi retaliation ordered by Himmler was brutal nonetheless. More than 13,000 were arrested, including Jan Kubiš' girlfriend Anna Malinová, who subsequently died in the Mauthausen-Gusen concentration camp. First Lieutenant Adolf Opálka's aunt, Marie Opálková, was executed in the Mauthausen camp on 24 October 1942;[28] his father, Viktor Jarolím, was also killed.[29] According to one estimate, 5,000 were killed in reprisals.[30]

Intelligence falsely linked the assassins to the villages of Lidice and Ležáky. A Gestapo report identified Lidice as the assailants' suspected hiding place since several Czech army officers exiled in England at the time were known to have come from there. In addition, the Gestapo had found a resistance radio transmitter in Ležáky.[31] In the village of Lidice, destroyed on 9 June 1942, 199 men were executed, 95 children taken prisoner (81 later killed in gas vans at the Chełmno extermination camp; eight others were taken for adoption by German families), and 195 women were immediately deported to Ravensbrück concentration camp. All adults, men and women, in the village of Ležáky were murdered. Both towns were burned, and the ruins of Lidice leveled.[32][33]

End Quote

Once again the Geneva Conventions clearly give the occupying power the right to enforce court decisions which is exactly what Israel does. Your example is pure BS and has no similarities to processes laid down in international law IE the Geneva Conventions.