Dennis Prager, KRLA am in los angeles, is nationally syndicated, will be interviewing a well reknowned Jewish scientist who will be discussing ID. I really dont know that much about the details of either evolution, or ID. I know enough to know that evolution, at the micro level could not have occured. Irreducable complexity of the single cell has not been refuted by evolutionists, so that alone is good enough for me. evolutionists also havent explained why it is so many mammals went back into the sea, and why it is ONLY the mammals who have adapted to every aspect of returning to the sea, fins, skin adaptation, eyes, etc, but they havent ADAPTED TO BREATHING UNDERWATER. They have adapted to holding their breath for long periods of time, but not actually breathing underwater. Now, I ask you, if you were forced to live underwater, and you had two of three choices, you would be given 1) you would have your body changed in a way to make you able to swim under water with the greatest of ease 2) you would have your skiin adapted to underwater, and no need for wet suit, mask for your eyes etc. and 3) you would be given the ability to breath underwater, never needing a tank, refills, to come to the surface to breath,,, which would you choose? If you choose breathing underwater as your first choice, then you chose against evolution ideas, if you choose anything else, I submit you are not being honest.